Wrong Result

These are all the questionable scores I could find for dual core s939 opterons. Is it possible to validate illegal versions, btw? Like if I bench with 1.58, and upload the score, will the checksum be valid?

Bwanasoft · May 1, 2008

Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818

at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066

FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8

and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too

jabski · May 1, 2008

Pifast - is this valid. Certainly not hexus Pifast

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643538

Turrican · May 1, 2008

super pi result in the wprime32m category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655534

S_A_V · May 2, 2008

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715457

bugged run (fps in mother nature is too high)

toutatoc · May 2, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068

The link of the screenshot is good on the forum link post. There's just this character " [ " on more in the link to the screenshot link http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7458/26753208id7.jpg

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729258

Wrong category or wrong result.

There's a pifast screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567231

No screenshot and no verification possible ?

Sweet · May 3, 2008

Wrong WPrime

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008

No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734

Please check it

Barron_Greenback · May 3, 2008

Hi Guys,

Is this result Ok for Prime1024 ?

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730699

Was done on 1.55, but only shows as "Core 2 Quad" - its a QX9650.

Cheers,

Rich.

Bwanasoft · May 3, 2008

3. Attempt

thx but have more

prime version 1.59 and look at CPU ! Athlon XP 2600

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760

and his other benches at this ( XP 1900+ Pal ) categorie are make with this CPU.

FAKE ! Look CPUZ PIC

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707086

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702347

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710538

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=324042 stand´s only AMD Athlon this comes when you use lower Multi at unlocked CPU - normaly stand AMD Athlon XP 1900+

here is the right CPU - forgot to downgrade the multi - looool

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760

Flasher !

GeForce 6800 per Rivatuner switch to Quadro FX 1400

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650261

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650412

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650413

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653413

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650262

Quadro FX 1400 have CORE NV41

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1318

all entries wrong GPU Core

Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818

at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066

FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8

and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too

S_A_V · May 3, 2008

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725531

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720489

Two ident scores from the same user. One submitted manually, second is forum post for/from another team.

Rossi · May 3, 2008

PiFast - 35.76 sec - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot)

Processor: Athlon 64 3800+ X2 ... @ 2150mhz [#1 Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Windsor in PiFast] on air

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=730645

On screen write Pifast4.3

And other score the same user - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) On screen write Pifast4.3 :

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730959

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730616

No CPU-Z or other programs... Only Pifast

http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=109481&thumb=false

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728376 no resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728432 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728392 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729414 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 screen is blurry

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729303 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728628 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729300 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726678 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725352 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727273 can't see version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727159 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713774 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729232 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729220 wrong version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 brisbane in windsor category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699698 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699701 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645100 no resolution

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729893 -No CPU description, and the superpi screen looks... weird:o Compare with other runs, too!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618530 - obviously wrong pifast version (10 sec difference to #2)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617702 - NO verification at all (I know it's a bit old, but lack of proof is an understatement)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=491165 - really old result, but no CPU info (which makes me think it may not have been valid when it was submitted)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617490 - NO verification (same as 617702)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556050 - same as above

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617563 - same as above

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715457
bugged run (fps in mother nature is too high)

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716595
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610013

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609947

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591118

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630147

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575960

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629393

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569497

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591117

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573659

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629395

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569513 - not sure if these are valid or not, so I'll let you decide (most have no CPUZ windows).

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580575

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561622

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575952

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572507

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565161

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561621

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581306

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572938

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566722

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561865

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571062

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561800

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562167

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571059

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614156

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561801 - invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574608 - NO verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660937

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563714 - missing CPU info

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684149

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684511 - 1.58/after 1.1.08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 - screenshot link broken (?)

These are all the questionable scores I could find for dual core s939 opterons. Is it possible to validate illegal versions, btw? Like if I bench with 1.58, and upload the score, will the checksum be valid?

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818

at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066

FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8

and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068
The link of the screenshot is good on the forum link post. There's just this character " [ " on more in the link to the screenshot link http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7458/26753208id7.jpg

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729258

Wrong category or wrong result.

There's a pifast screenshot.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567231

No screenshot and no verification possible ?

fixed

Your screenshot is not valid, because there is no CPU-Z memory tab.

demiurg · May 4, 2008

Wrong WPrime

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008

No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734

Please check it

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

Hi Guys,

Is this result Ok for Prime1024 ?

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730699

Was done on 1.55, but only shows as "Core 2 Quad" - its a QX9650.

Cheers,

Rich.

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

3. Attempt

Not sure about 8400GS, rest is fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725531
http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720489

Two ident scores from the same user. One submitted manually, second is forum post for/from another team.

fixed

demiurg · May 4, 2008

PiFast - 35.76 sec - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot)
Processor: Athlon 64 3800+ X2 ... @ 2150mhz [#1 Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Windsor in PiFast] on air

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=730645

On screen write Pifast4.3

And other score the same user - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) On screen write Pifast4.3 :

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730959

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730616

No CPU-Z or other programs... Only Pifast

http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=109481&thumb=false