knopflerbruce Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716595 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610013 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609947 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591118 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630147 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575960 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629393 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569497 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591117 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629395 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569513 - not sure if these are valid or not, so I'll let you decide (most have no CPUZ windows). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580575 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575952 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572507 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565161 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561621 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581306 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572938 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566722 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571062 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561800 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562167 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571059 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614156 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561801 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574608 - NO verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563714 - missing CPU info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684149 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684511 - 1.58/after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 - screenshot link broken (?) These are all the questionable scores I could find for dual core s939 opterons. Is it possible to validate illegal versions, btw? Like if I bench with 1.58, and upload the score, will the checksum be valid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818 at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066 FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8 and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted May 1, 2008 Share Posted May 1, 2008 Pifast - is this valid. Certainly not hexus Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643538 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted May 1, 2008 Crew Share Posted May 1, 2008 super pi result in the wprime32m category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655534 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715457 bugged run (fps in mother nature is too high) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toutatoc Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 The link of the screenshot is good on the forum link post. There's just this character " [ " on more in the link to the screenshot link http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7458/26753208id7.jpg http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729258 Wrong category or wrong result. There's a pifast screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567231 No screenshot and no verification possible ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted May 3, 2008 Crew Share Posted May 3, 2008 Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008 No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734 Please check it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barron_Greenback Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 Hi Guys, Is this result Ok for Prime1024 ? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730699 Was done on 1.55, but only shows as "Core 2 Quad" - its a QX9650. Cheers, Rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 3. Attempt thx but have more prime version 1.59 and look at CPU ! Athlon XP 2600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760 and his other benches at this ( XP 1900+ Pal ) categorie are make with this CPU. FAKE ! Look CPUZ PIC http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707086 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702347 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710538 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=324042 stand´s only AMD Athlon this comes when you use lower Multi at unlocked CPU - normaly stand AMD Athlon XP 1900+ here is the right CPU - forgot to downgrade the multi - looool http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707760 Flasher ! GeForce 6800 per Rivatuner switch to Quadro FX 1400 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650412 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650262 Quadro FX 1400 have CORE NV41 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1318 all entries wrong GPU Core Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818 at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066 FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8 and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725531 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720489 Two ident scores from the same user. One submitted manually, second is forum post for/from another team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossi Posted May 3, 2008 Share Posted May 3, 2008 PiFast - 35.76 sec - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) Processor: Athlon 64 3800+ X2 ... @ 2150mhz [#1 Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Windsor in PiFast] on air http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=730645 On screen write Pifast4.3 And other score the same user - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) On screen write Pifast4.3 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730959 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730616 No CPU-Z or other programs... Only Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=109481&thumb=false Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728376 no resolutionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728432 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728392 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729414 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 screen is blurry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729303 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728628 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729300 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726678 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725352 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727273 can't see version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727159 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713774 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729232 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729220 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 brisbane in windsor category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699698 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699701 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645100 no resolution fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729893 -No CPU description, and the superpi screen looks... weird:o Compare with other runs, too! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618530 - obviously wrong pifast version (10 sec difference to #2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617702 - NO verification at all (I know it's a bit old, but lack of proof is an understatement) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=491165 - really old result, but no CPU info (which makes me think it may not have been valid when it was submitted) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617490 - NO verification (same as 617702) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556050 - same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617563 - same as above fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715457bugged run (fps in mother nature is too high) fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716595http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610013 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609947 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591118 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630147 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575960 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629393 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569497 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591117 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629395 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569513 - not sure if these are valid or not, so I'll let you decide (most have no CPUZ windows). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580575 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575952 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572507 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565161 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561621 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581306 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572938 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566722 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571062 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561800 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562167 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571059 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614156 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561801 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574608 - NO verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563714 - missing CPU info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684149 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684511 - 1.58/after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 - screenshot link broken (?) These are all the questionable scores I could find for dual core s939 opterons. Is it possible to validate illegal versions, btw? Like if I bench with 1.58, and upload the score, will the checksum be valid? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Flasher http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=10818 at this Categorie he flashed a 7900 GT/GTX to Quadro FX 3500 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1066 FX 3500 have 20/7 Pixel Vertex and GTX have 24/8 and the other benches at this Categorie are suspect too fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700068 The link of the screenshot is good on the forum link post. There's just this character " [ " on more in the link to the screenshot link http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7458/26753208id7.jpg http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729258 Wrong category or wrong result. There's a pifast screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567231 No screenshot and no verification possible ? fixed Your screenshot is not valid, because there is no CPU-Z memory tab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Wrong WPrime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688298 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688524 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684574 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704338 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701705 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731144 Checksum Invalid date 03-05-2008 No Cpu-z (CPU and Memory) only screen Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725734 Please check it fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Hi Guys, Is this result Ok for Prime1024 ? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730699 Was done on 1.55, but only shows as "Core 2 Quad" - its a QX9650. Cheers, Rich. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 3. Attempt Not sure about 8400GS, rest is fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725531http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720489 Two ident scores from the same user. One submitted manually, second is forum post for/from another team. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 PiFast - 35.76 sec - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot)Processor: Athlon 64 3800+ X2 ... @ 2150mhz [#1 Athlon 64 3800+ X2 Windsor in PiFast] on air http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=730645 On screen write Pifast4.3 And other score the same user - cht! (Union Francophone Hwbot) On screen write Pifast4.3 : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730959 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730616 No CPU-Z or other programs... Only Pifast http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=109481&thumb=false fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 Please move all Gotcha's results from 7500LE 64mb category to 256mb category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731111 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731112 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731110 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731109 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731108 Gotcha you can ask Bwanasoft to make new category for your self http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729699 not enought proof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted May 4, 2008 Share Posted May 4, 2008 demiurg, thanks for those SPi 32M scores (you know what I mean)! ) But what about this? frebrez received both scores.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 Please check this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts