fuzz3l Posted May 8, 2008 Share Posted May 8, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732521 - no res, no GPU-Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732989 - matched to wrong CPU - QX9775 in QX9770 category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=733417 - 104k 3dmark01 with 3900mhz cpu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzz3l Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732220 - no CPU-Z and no GPU-Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placid Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731181 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 this score is too high for such clocks(maybe mipmap)pls compare to other results qx9650@4.1Ghz 9800GX2 733/1099 615@5-5-5-15 96989 vista http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729313 vs my e8500@4.7Ghz 9800GX2 775/1160 595@5-5-4-8 93873 xp pro http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730541 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631781 on screen is 161sec but in hwbot set 121sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stealth Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 Can you please check these: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700706 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573318 checksum: 38D904B4 (invalid) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579551 checksum: 1AEB35AB (invalid) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579633 checksum: 1A281360 (invalid) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702182 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728231 Insufficient verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702157 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702159 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663773 checksum: A8F28418 (invalid) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729770 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691227 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729765 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691244 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694672 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715755 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694743 wrong wPrime version after 1/1/08 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 jmke I like to work through a forum So, guys, you can continue to write here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 this score is too high for such clocks(maybe mipmap)pls compare to other resultsqx9650@4.1Ghz 9800GX2 733/1099 615@5-5-5-15 96989 vista http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729313 vs my e8500@4.7Ghz 9800GX2 775/1160 595@5-5-4-8 93873 xp pro http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=730541 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631781 on screen is 161sec but in hwbot set 121sec fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 Why I cannot use both of a way of moderation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 But someone prefers personal contact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts