demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714778http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715047 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714780 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715049 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=715048 All in the wrong category, cpu-z shows socket nanoBGA2 hence mobile, should all be in here.... http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1606 fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651656 Screenshot in the link to forumpost shows a Prescott in the Northwood category. fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727933 ver 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728015 ver. 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728641 wrong score, Wprime 1024 ,. post in Wprime 32 fixed
demiurg Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 1.43 not 1.41 pifast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711843 fixed
Just Learnin' Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 You do very nice work Demiurg, thanks. :woot:
Narmer Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495 bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877
mtech Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Please, check these results: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652804 5111MHz - 8min 26sec. 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms You can compare with this result, for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652803 5111MHz - 16sec 0ms - Possible hardware sharing (results are posted with the same CPU clock at approx. the same time): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 posted: 26-04-2008 08:41, CPU clock = 3828MHz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 posted: 26-04-2008 08:54, CPU clock= 3828MHz
lunatic@98 Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Please, check these results:1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728159 Result is too high for this CPU clock: 4450MHz - 4min 41sec It s a Ghost-Result http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%27petr00kos%27&o=Score 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726385http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726381 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728146 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728143 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728145 - Results are too high for these CPU clocks. For example: 4410MHz - 8sec 590ms I think, there are QX9650 For example, the 4410MHz CPU from fuego http://wprime.net/search.html?r=searchscore&q=USER%3D%22fuego%22&o= wprime is a funny automatic reading benchmark, lol
toutatoc Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Why ,it's validated with only checksum on Wprime. You can require screens like the others benchs ?
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683495bad category - Mobile Celeron 1.6Ghz in Mobile Celeron 1.8Ghz edit1 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728404 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728204 edit2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 fixed
malefic Fess Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710571 CPU-Z validation is rejected
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710571CPU-Z validation is rejected fixed
lunatic@98 Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 wrong screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701051 is it a choke or not? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709040
demiurg Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 wrong screenhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701051 is it a choke or not? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709040 fixed
Narmer Posted April 29, 2008 Posted April 29, 2008 thx demi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 can't see a card model what about this?
Crew Sweet Posted April 29, 2008 Crew Posted April 29, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707963 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693474 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700789 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696107 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696105 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693545 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699491 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699488 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711240 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711241 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685034 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685037 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729280 ver 1.61
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 thx demi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610877 can't see a card model what about this? Too old, sorry
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 Wrong Wprime http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707963 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693474 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700789 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696107 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696105 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693545 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699491 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699488 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711240 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711241 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685034 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685037 ver 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729280 ver 1.61 fixed
Veld Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 frebrez received both scores, but one of them was signed by hs... wtf?! __________________________________ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637227 Very suspect similar scores (mem timings the same.. Vcore the same.. screen's design the same) Please check them..
demiurg Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 even if the screen is wrong? I cannot say this is cheated results so I cannot delete it and I cannot request more verification because it is too old
Pepek86 Posted April 30, 2008 Posted April 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728376 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728432 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728392 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729414 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727171 screen is blurry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729303 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728628 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729300 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726678 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725352 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727273 can't see version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727159 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713774 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729232 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729220 wrong version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 brisbane in windsor category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699698 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699701 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645100 no resolution
jabski Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 wrong cpu - E8400 not Q6600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729432
knopflerbruce Posted May 1, 2008 Posted May 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729893 -No CPU description, and the superpi screen looks... weird:o Compare with other runs, too! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618530 - obviously wrong pifast version (10 sec difference to #2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617702 - NO verification at all (I know it's a bit old, but lack of proof is an understatement) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=491165 - really old result, but no CPU info (which makes me think it may not have been valid when it was submitted) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617490 - NO verification (same as 617702) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556050 - same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617563 - same as above
Recommended Posts