philbrown_23 Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 wait a minute, isnt it in the rules that ES hardware isnt allowed to be in HWBOT rankings??? well says right in the screenshot they are ES cpu's yet he gets 5.7 points for wprime 32m 12X rank, and 2 points for 32m 2X Xeon rank, thats a little shiesty imo. I'ts odd this would be on the 1st page to, usually only WR are on the first page???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Movieman Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 wait a minute, isnt it in the rules that ES hardware isnt allowed to be in HWBOT rankings??? well says right in the screenshot they are ES cpu's yet he gets 5.7 points for wprime 32m 12X rank, and 2 points for 32m 2X Xeon rank, thats a little shiesty imo. I'ts odd this would be on the 1st page to, usually only WR are on the first page???? Just so that everyone here is aware of peoples motivations, I banned philbrown23 aka Overclocking101, from XS after seeing a rant by him that he was going over to XS to make some trouble. I can provide a screenshot of that if necessary. As to Es submissions I was under the impression that once the cpu was available publically it was able to be used. My X5680 B0 cpu's are no better and in fact they are a little weaker in the IMC area than the retail B1's so I have no advantage whatsoever. Also the top single socket submission is on a ES also,maybe more, I just checked one. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/972059_sf3d_wprime_32m_core_i7_980x_2sec_625ms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packet Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 (edited) good effort MM keep pushing bro!... Edited May 25, 2010 by packet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebanik Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 wait a minute, isnt it in the rules that ES hardware isnt allowed to be in HWBOT rankings??? well says right in the screenshot they are ES cpu's yet he gets 5.7 points for wprime 32m 12X rank, and 2 points for 32m 2X Xeon rank, thats a little shiesty imo. I'ts odd this would be on the 1st page to, usually only WR are on the first page???? You need to read the rules again, its not that hard. Once a product is available for purchase it starts getting point, ES or not. If ES and if your conscious(personally I dont see a problem) doesnt allow posting ES scores for points then the individual have an option to not compete for points. Great score movieman....Keep pushing it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 wooot the end of the world has come close - mm benching OMGOMGOMG :D really nice score and now we wanna see some 480 GTX SLI hehehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Movieman Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Thank you all and SoF you made me laugh.. Yea,me benching is like hell freezing over but I enjoy it once in a while. I don't think anyone is going to break that 1.920s time though. You'll need on the far side of 6GHz with a SR2 board to get that number. Thanks again guys.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchnit Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Thank you all and SoF you made me laugh..Yea,me benching is like hell freezing over but I enjoy it once in a while. I don't think anyone is going to break that 1.920s time though. You'll need on the far side of 6GHz with a SR2 board to get that number. Thanks again guys.. If they had rankings for fastest finish on a WCG WU you'd be a benching addict. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 (edited) Dave send me you SR2 with the 2 Xeons and I'll nail that overal WR for you.... Edited May 25, 2010 by hipro5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Movieman Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Dave send me you SR2 with the 2 Xeons and I'll nail that overal WR for you.... George, of all the people in the world you are the one that I'd send it to with a smile, but the record would be yours my friend.. The system needs one last thing IMO to be perfect and thats to have a bios update that unlocks the uncore. I mentioned that to Peter and I think they are working on it. Locked at 20 and with that lots of VTT needed to hit even 200BCLK.. 1.4VTT needed and I like to stay under that with air cooling. I have tested to 205 BCLK with a lower multi but for everyday 24/7 100% load work the machine is a joy at 25x168 for 4200mhz with 1.35vcore and 1.325VTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuchnit Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Dave send me you SR2 with the 2 Xeons and I'll nail that overal WR for you.... Only that one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted May 25, 2010 Share Posted May 25, 2010 Just a thought... if you want the overall 32m record, just LN2 these CPUs and you'll get it easily. The cluster is too slow at creating threads. I bet that in a year or two there will be similar setups that can beat the 1024m record as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoF Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I have tested to 205 BCLK with a lower multi but for everyday 24/7 100% load work the machine is a joy at 25x168 for 4200mhz with 1.35vcore and 1.325VTT I think you are quite in the first places when it comes to category "best allday system" Now waiting for winter to play outside?! HeHeHe It's good to see you benching (once a while ) :celebration: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Movieman Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Just a thought... if you want the overall 32m record, just LN2 these CPUs and you'll get it easily. The cluster is too slow at creating threads. I bet that in a year or two there will be similar setups that can beat the 1024m record as well. I ran the numbers and app 6GHz or more needed to beat the 1.920s time. At 5500MHz you get a 1.956s time and thats tested. Very tough to beat 192 cores with 12 no matter how fast those 12 cores are.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 I ran the numbers and app 6GHz or more needed to beat the 1.920s time.At 5500MHz you get a 1.956s time and thats tested. Very tough to beat 192 cores with 12 no matter how fast those 12 cores are.. In 32m you need both, however 192 is total overkill. I bet he could get a better score with a lower number of threads, it wouldn't surprise me for a second if the first few threads were already finished when the last ones started to work. If you keep your PP I think you need less than 5.5GHz, actually. A tleast not as much as 6, not sure how uncore etc will affect the score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Movieman Posted May 26, 2010 Share Posted May 26, 2010 In 32m you need both, however 192 is total overkill. I bet he could get a better score with a lower number of threads, it wouldn't surprise me for a second if the first few threads were already finished when the last ones started to work. If you keep your PP I think you need less than 5.5GHz, actually. A tleast not as much as 6, not sure how uncore etc will affect the score. wPrime32m has already been run on a SR2 at over 5500mhz and got 1.956s Just not submitted to HWBot but a legit time from someone we all respect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.