Plz check & delete many results in 2005. Many of them with SOFT RAMDISK!!!!

Its cheating! All of this results are deleting from ORB.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571506

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604653

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594083

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594074

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611922

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611899

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610019

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596742

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589747

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607500

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589486

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607263

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561356

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617335

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580510

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576357

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576761

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570185

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556578

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614326

Good to know

 

(btw, in contrary to FM, we do allow iRam results, but not soft ramdisks)

+most off them have no proof off there scores

Sorry for my stupidity, but how would these RAMDisks improve performance?

Why all of this bad results still alive?

ps I think 50% of results on hwbot with software ramdisk. U need to do something.

HDD bench part will get insane score; and total score rises remarkably

 

Oh yeah that's right. I for once read it as 3DMark05, and couldn't see why.

HWBot does not prohibit the use of hardware Ram disks (i-Ram). There will be a front page post made shortly regarding this, all users with existing scores will be asked to provide backup verification with a screen shot or by screen capping the project in their project manager. All of the above links were valid at one time and we are not changing our stance based on FM's lack of consistency.

I have problem with PCmark 05 ranking in Opteron 165 section i should be 7th, but insteed i am 13th, why is that. Can some correct this.

 

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=9&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&cpu=Opteron+165+.09+%281098%29&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=717&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

And people below me, don't have the correct ranking.

 

 

I post here so that i didn't opened a new thread.

HWBot does not prohibit the use of hardware Ram disks (i-Ram). There will be a front page post made shortly regarding this, all users with existing scores will be asked to provide backup verification with a screen shot or by screen capping the project in their project manager. All of the above links were valid at one time and we are not changing our stance based on FM's lack of consistency.

 

How do scores differ between software and hardware ram disks? In other words how do you prove a score used software vs. hardware?

Some of Gradus links are for I-RAM RAID results. I didnt check all of them though.

 

From personal experience, you only need to start looking carefully if the XP startup test scores 400+

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665397

HDD XP - 1519 mb/s

HDD GU - 1435 mb/s

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665694

HDD XP - 1463 mb/s