Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Maximous - Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 5318.2MHz - 5sec 797ms wPrime - 32m


Aliover

Recommended Posts

Dear friend.

You must do the thing you say to put the link to Valid.

In this test, you will not be accepted.

Even the memory and the motherboard header not even have a picture!

Also, please use your words too careful!

We're all friends here and we are gathered here to compete.

   If your test is incorrect and fraud and why the fuck do not we have a say!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again.

With me (ontheair) Yes, I've told you the right words.

Just you.

Boudin was a good test for the first time, but the effect was much better than Windows.

Summary sorry that I judged too soon.

 

:/ Dude;You need a new translator or something.

LOL @ "My brain is full of bunny" :D Gappo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear friend.

You must do the thing you say to put the link to Valid.

In this test, you will not be accepted.

Even the memory and the motherboard header not even have a picture!

Also, please use your words too careful!

We're all friends here and we are gathered here to compete.

** If your test is incorrect and fraud and why the bunny do not we have a say!

 

This score was submitted in January of 2011. It is also submitted in the Extreme Overclocking League. The XOL does not require photos of the system, only the Enthusiast League does.

 

Basically, this is a very inefficient WPrime run. He probably had the benchmark on another HDD and it had to spin up at the start, hence the extremely slow time. I've done it myself with WPrime.

 

Calling it a cheat, especially since he gets no points for it, is a bit of a stretch. Reporting it is just silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, really incomprehensible.

 

I don't see what's the problem here.

 

CPUZ shows core VID, not the actual voltage and even if it was the actual voltage, it might be possible to run 5.3GHz with 1.3V on LN2 full pot.

Don't understand also why the score is questioned. It's horrible, yes, but how this invalidates it? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello.

Yes friends.

I have my weak English.

That's why I use google.

What else can!

Sorry for the meaning of words.

I am not cheating.

It was also

CPU frequency and time tested together, they did not fit.

Well aside.

It is important to learn from each other.

OC work together for progress.

He was talking with a friend of mine who said that the LN2 cooling method to lower the voltage to the processor is required.

 Again, sorry friends...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello.

Yes friends.

I have my weak English.

That's why I use google.

What else can!

Sorry for the meaning of words.

I am not cheating.

It was also

CPU frequency and time tested together, they did not fit.

Well aside.

It is important to learn from each other.

OC work together for progress.

He was talking with a friend of mine who said that the LN2 cooling method to lower the voltage to the processor is required.

*Again, sorry friends...

 

It is possible for benchmarks to run really slowly.

 

Any of these could have happened:

  • Chosen the wrong amount of threads
  • Run the benchmark from another hard drive
  • The CPU could have throttled

 

The voltage could (and probably was) read wrong by CPU-Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...