trodas Posted December 28, 2013 Posted December 28, 2013 Guys, I do wonder, what are the "right" UCbenchmark commandline settings, because at 2750MHz I got just (by default commandline "unrar bench test.rar") score 58.9. While JimmyFox got 77.9 at lower clock - 2700MHz and about same CPU (S939 Athlon 64 vs S969 Opteron 148): http://hwbot.org/submission/2464619_jimmyfox_ucbench_2011_athlon_64_3700_san_diego_77.9_mpt_score So, a 2750MHz / 1000MHz HTlink / 229MHz rams at 2.5-3-3-7 1T yield score 58.9. Yet a 2700MHz / 810MHz HTlink / 225MHz rams at 3-3-3-8 1T yield score 77.9?! WTF! I believe that there IS something wrong and maybe the commandline is the answer...? Therefore I do wonder, what are the precise commandline for that much improved results Quote
trodas Posted December 28, 2013 Author Posted December 28, 2013 Oh, using a commandline (used google for the part that IS visible) like this: unrar bench -cf=sse2r -cpus=1,4,8,12,36,48,56,64 test.rar ...give me 77.5 score! This is still lower that this should be, but definitively a improvement! ...but is not this cheating? And it there are something more that I should add to get the extra performance? Quote
trodas Posted December 29, 2013 Author Posted December 29, 2013 (edited) Get to score 80 by overclocking to 252MHz FSB (so 2MHz = increase of 2.5 points) ... so I tried 254 to get 1st place and failed, suddently the speed go down to score 78... Suxx, help! Edited July 19, 2014 by trodas Quote
knopflerbruce Posted December 29, 2013 Posted December 29, 2013 Rerun a few times. It's a "good run" benchmark. Quote
utilizatori Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 Oh, using a commandline (used google for the part that IS visible) like this: unrar bench -cf=sse2r -cpus=1,4,8,12,36,48,56,64 test.rar ...give me 77.5 score! This is still lower that this should be, but definitively a improvement! ...but is not this cheating? And it there are something more that I should add to get the extra performance? you don't have to dig in command line just set in advanced (adv... button) thread count manually I use to set only 64 test test takes much less time and in my case I get best scores with 64 thread but maybe one should tweak other thread count options for better results Quote
Doug2507 Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 Have a look elsewhere on the forum…. Quote
Crew Strunkenbold Posted February 18, 2014 Crew Posted February 18, 2014 on single cores very efficient: start /high /b Quote
Gunslinger Posted February 18, 2014 Posted February 18, 2014 Rerun a few times. It's a "good run" benchmark. Translated to "It's a bug high benchmark" Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.