Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

sofos1990

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    576

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by sofos1990

  1. sofos1990
    It's pci 3 Dinos. When the card is idle is pci 1 and when it loads goes to pci 3.
  2. sofos1990
    Nice George. Mine has bclk wall at 106.6. Maybe 4340s better than 4570Ts in terms of bclk.
  3. sofos1990
    Great score for 5700!
  4. sofos1990
    Thank you guys. Goddy I never had a problem with M6E. To be honest I've never heard for a dead cpu due to motherboard except you're talking about high voltages.
  5. sofos1990
    Also physics test of 3dmark 11 is good for stability.
  6. sofos1990
    You should test every single chip on ln2. Air is just to check the chip. If one of those had -120 - -130 cb maybe it was a 6.3 3d chip.
  7. sofos1990
    Maybe you guys are running with a different order, I don't know. Only Strategos has a very high Nature.
  8. sofos1990
    I'm not 100% but after a quick test at 6200 seems that 6.6 ivy is faster.
  9. sofos1990
    Wish they were that fast on am3 as well!!
  10. sofos1990
    Indeed, very efficient run Maxim. Well done!
  11. sofos1990
    Nice chip there Bullant. Does it scale with voltage?
  12. sofos1990
    James I don't put the blame on you for this situation with pcmark. You are not responsible for this. I just say that if this benchmark can't be controlled there is no reason to exist. As for publishing what you told me. Sorry, I just realized my mistake and I deleted this part of my post. Anyway for me it's over. I won't bench again pcmark so I don't have to worry about it.
  13. sofos1990
    http://hwbot.org/submission/2335279_moose83_pcmark_2005_core_i7_extreme_975_56182_marks Knut, even if I had reported some scores that don't seem ok to me the truth (and prove me wrong if it's different) is that noone would had done something more than see the report. Roman and pro has been told about some results months ago and you see that nothing happened until now. So how this benchmark can still exist with 0 moderation? Moose, that's what I'm talking about. The scaling on this benchmark is strange and to be honest noone knows it. It's not like 3dmark that from score to score the difference is 2-3-4-5 fps. On some tests here we are talking about thousands and hundreds of points as you mentioned Mike's TW which I've been very close and my VS on 555. You can't say that are true but you can't also say that they are not. I strongly believe that they are OK but will you report them? Are you 100% sure that these scores are illegal?
  14. sofos1990
    Of course noone will report it as long as I heard that dual arecas can be combined even if I don't know how. That's why supposed that pro is pcmark moderator. He should had asked Moose how is that possible and test it. I can't report a score that is right. As you see Moose never asked about it and noone removed his score. I say again that his score is OK but once he doesn't want to give further info then it should be removed. I could use ramdisk and get 1200 GU and never been asked about it but I didn't...
  15. sofos1990
    Valid FM links is the last thing Mike lol. There are more serious problems here. Sometime FM links are like cpuz validations. You think that they are OK but they aren't. As for the first part of your post I agree. My motivation is the global points if pcmark will stop getting points then I will stop bench it and I think most of the guys will do the same. Maybe I would bench pcmark when I wouldn't have something else to spend my weekend.
  16. sofos1990
    Excuse me Knut but there is no active thread for anything around pcmark as it seems. Moose's score with dual arecas is up from 12/12/12. Don't tell me that almost one year you're trying to contact Moose for this. You see on your own that noone from the staff cares about it and to go one step further, noone will care.
  17. sofos1990
    Thank you. If I'm not wrong this score is the first with a retail chip!
  18. sofos1990
    All of us who still benching PCMark we have spent a lot of money on it. SSDs, 7970, RAID cards so it's not only one guy who will suffer if the benchmark will be removed from point list. It can be replaced with PCMark7 which also needs the same kind of setup like 05. PCMark05 will still exist but without global points so if someone wants to bench he will bench it but the moderation will be easier because most of the guys are hunting the global points. PCMark is not a common benchmark. It scales with frequency as well as with the tweaks you use. You also have to be very lucky to get a nice score on some categories. I tried on 3 sessions to get VS on 3x cores, I spent 5-6 hours totally to get it. If someone wants me to prove it I can't but that's it. It's pure luck! @Schmuckley, the question here is who wants to take this responsibility. The guy who will moderate won't bench PCMark05 again. Moreover he needs to have all this crazy expensive equipment to test our "creditbility". I also guess that some tweaks won't be told to him. Just an example...I don't believe that Moose will share his tweak/driver/whatever it is for spanning 2 controllers. @Moose, the way that Roman suggets won't let the benchmark die. If you want to bench you can, noone will stop you.
  19. sofos1990
    I know. I asked Roman about these things and I suppose he created a thread internal. Again you don't see my point. Even if a super wrapper will be made again someone would be able to use something out of limits. Will be there serious moderation or again the same situation like now? Cause if the moderation will be the same not even 100 wrappers will be enough to control everything and everyone.
  20. sofos1990
    Just to clear my position here. I'm not attacking you personally Mike. I know that everything is possible and of course if the system is pushed is reasonable something like that to happen. I just want to show to everyone that noone from the staff asked you how is that possible. Noone from the staff cares for pcmark so why this benchmark still gets points?
  21. sofos1990
    We are talking about a benchmark that includes 10+ tests. It's not like 05 or 3d marks. Every single test has tweaks and the equipment is used is expensive and of course the moderators are not obliged to have it. There are many many submissions that seems to have problem. First of all controllers span. Only Moose has done till now and at his last submission he didn't use it. Has anyone checked this? I'm not saying that he is using something illegal but it's the only guy. Also, I saw that some submissions of Mike are invalid according to FM. Again I'm not saying that he using cheats but why my links are OK? Back in days in another thread I think that you had decided to block the submissions with revodrives. Unfortunately submissions with revodrives are still up.
  22. sofos1990
    I think it's time for pc mark to stop getting points and replaced from another benchmark. Many scores that seems to be bugged and noone explains how he did it. Noone cares about pc mark anymore.
  23. sofos1990
    2 gpus of course! Thanks
  24. sofos1990
    Nice
  25. sofos1990
    Anyone tested L315B304 ?
×
×
  • Create New...