sofos1990

Thank you. If I'm not wrong this score is the first with a retail chip!

All of us who still benching PCMark we have spent a lot of money on it. SSDs, 7970, RAID cards so it's not only one guy who will suffer if the benchmark will be removed from point list. It can be replaced with PCMark7 which also needs the same kind of setup like 05. PCMark05 will still exist but without global points so if someone wants to bench he will bench it but the moderation will be easier because most of the guys are hunting the global points. PCMark is not a common benchmark. It scales with frequency as well as with the tweaks you use. You also have to be very lucky to get a nice score on some categories. I tried on 3 sessions to get VS on 3x cores, I spent 5-6 hours totally to get it. If someone wants me to prove it I can't but that's it. It's pure luck! @Schmuckley, the question here is who wants to take this responsibility. The guy who will moderate won't bench PCMark05 again. Moreover he needs to have all this crazy expensive equipment to test our "creditbility". I also guess that some tweaks won't be told to him. Just an example...I don't believe that Moose will share his tweak/driver/whatever it is for spanning 2 controllers. @Moose, the way that Roman suggets won't let the benchmark die. If you want to bench you can, noone will stop you.

I know. I asked Roman about these things and I suppose he created a thread internal. Again you don't see my point. Even if a super wrapper will be made again someone would be able to use something out of limits. Will be there serious moderation or again the same situation like now? Cause if the moderation will be the same not even 100 wrappers will be enough to control everything and everyone.

Just to clear my position here. I'm not attacking you personally Mike. I know that everything is possible and of course if the system is pushed is reasonable something like that to happen. I just want to show to everyone that noone from the staff asked you how is that possible. Noone from the staff cares for pcmark so why this benchmark still gets points?

We are talking about a benchmark that includes 10+ tests. It's not like 05 or 3d marks. Every single test has tweaks and the equipment is used is expensive and of course the moderators are not obliged to have it. There are many many submissions that seems to have problem. First of all controllers span. Only Moose has done till now and at his last submission he didn't use it. Has anyone checked this? I'm not saying that he is using something illegal but it's the only guy. Also, I saw that some submissions of Mike are invalid according to FM. Again I'm not saying that he using cheats but why my links are OK? Back in days in another thread I think that you had decided to block the submissions with revodrives. Unfortunately submissions with revodrives are still up.

I think it's time for pc mark to stop getting points and replaced from another benchmark. Many scores that seems to be bugged and noone explains how he did it. Noone cares about pc mark anymore.

2 gpus of course! Thanks

Nice

Anyone tested L315B304 ?

Nice card there Michal!!!

No air testing on this one Goddy. The 407 does 6.3 05 with 1.75 and it boots with 1.35 at 5G. It doesn't scale well with voltage and the cb is -120C. On the 371 the cb is at -100C. I believe that we should search for LN2 scaling cpus and not for a specific batch. I had L312 and L309 but no luck.

L315B371 is bad on LN2 at least mine. 1m at 6100 max with 1.9. Testing the 407 now...

L315B371 and L315B407?

Any clue if Intel will make a new stepping of Haswells?

Nice Roman! How do you apply 36x on the second core?

It's very weird man. Maximum bclk I achieved was 106.2 but I'm on SS. Maybe it scales on LN2. I will try it one day.

Is this for real?

Thank you guys. Kenny search for SLI Hack.

Yeap I know. The problem is that the last 2 cores are the best. I think that if you turn off the cores through the bios it turns off the last 2 cores so...

Once I select no points it should be for any kind of points. On the oc league the meaning of no points it's for not be moved to the pro oc. So if the global are removed there's no meaning for the no points feature.

My question is about global points so there's no need to start a new thread. I choose no points on my best 01 result because it's with an ES cpu but all my global points removed from my second best 01 which is with retail cpu. I don't know if it's for the same reason as above(15 best).

I'm very interested to learn how you connect the 2 controllers. Nice GU.

Benchable frequency? Great job guys!

Nature fixed. http://hwbot.org/submission/2392824_sofos1990_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_titan_187356_marks?recalculate=true

Name those for who are you talking about if you want this tread to end somewhere. I remember that I had replied to someone again for this fact. There's no reason to discuss about sponsorship in the pro oc but in the oc league you have to gain this advantage. Do some good scores and ask the vendors fro some products. Have you tried it ?