-
Posts
280 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Casanova
-
-
27 minutes ago, TASOS said:
Interesting submission !!!
On which OS was that ?
Windows 3.1 using win32s to make Superpi able to run under a 16bits system
-
@antinomy i'll change this submission hardware category when you create the database for it. Thanks again :)
-
Wow, amazing result Shady!!
-
1 hour ago, Antinomy said:
Missed your thread. Will add it after work.
Antinomy, if possible, please add this one too:
Thanks in advance
-
Fellows, i'm doing some bech tests with this FPU/Math Coprocessor from IIT company.
It's basically a cpu dedicated to process floating point unit operations.
Since 486dx they were embedded in this cpus, but in 386 era they were provided separately by some companies, IIT is one of them.
Any more information you guys need i'll be more than happy to provide
-
15 minutes ago, suzuki said:
Reserved it for me.
Sorry for asking, but wasn't you who mentioned in another thread that you already have like five or six rex?
Are you binning it or something?
-
-
Hey Alby, is the asrock 4coredual sata2 still available?
-
1
-
-
Thanks A LOT
It is correct, amd "clone" version of original intel 80386sx, Cyrix made their ones too.
Back in middle 80'ies Intel had a deal with Amd and other companies that allowed then to produce their own 386, but they are essencially all the same cpus" ng80386sx
Edit: This is the datasheet from amd 386 processors, along with a table from wiki (the info is correct, i checked it in the datasheet):
http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheet/AdvancedMicroDevices/mXwtys.pdf
Model number Frequency FSB Voltage Power Socket Release date AMD Am386SX/SXL-33 33 MHz 33 MHz 5 V 1.35 Watt 100-pin PQFP 1992 -
I did a print screen with some information that might help.
Unfortunately this old cpu is not compatible with cpuz or any other "modern" cpu id software, but i used old norton system info and checkcpu windows 3.1 software to help identify it.
I also want to know if a print screen like this will be enough for a future superpi1m validation run? I did a "quick" superpi16k run as an example.
@Leeghoofd or @Antinomy i would apreciatte some help with this.
If you guys need any other info please quote me here.
Thanks a lot.
-
@Antinomy what informations do you need to add this cpu to the database?
-
Nice price indeed.
-
1
-
-
This ng80386sx-33 is not available under amd or intel database options. I opened a ticket under support forum, thanks :)
-
@Antinomy please add this cpu to the database, i could not find it under Amd 80386 options.
Thanks in advance
-
@Leeghoofd Sorry for marking you here, but i don't know who from staff can add hardware to the database. Thanks in advance!
-
Please add this processor to the database so i can edit this result using the correct one. Photos included
-
Mods already said it is a 100% OK result, so move on Daimons, please waste your time benching, it's much more fun than digging others results.
Try to bench for the fun, not for the points.
-
1
-
-
Great run Pete, i'll bench cold this month, willing for a good result as yours.
-
Nice result Shady! Congratulations
-
Congrats Bones, first place!
-
Great result! Congrats
-
Bin e7xxx is a must, i'm not bining it, but already tried 1x e7500 1x e7400 and 1x e7200 tbe less bad was e7200 470fsb but due to low multi it performs worst than e7500 with 415fsb.
Good luck binning it Allen, hope you find a gold one.
-
1
-
-
Things were not that easy in ddr2 era than nowadays hardware, plus wolf 3m are usually crap
-
Nice score captain :)
Casanova - Am386 SX/SXL-33 @ 33.6MHz - 10h 1min 58sec 0ms SuperPi - 1M
in Result Discussions
Posted
Sure hahaha!
If i wasn't using a math coprocessor this run would have take 11 to 12 days!
I'm trying to run 32m but after 9 hours (before giving initial value) it crashs with that SQR05 value problem. I'm almost sure that this happens because this hdd is too small, only 50mb free space disk.