[John May - Pentium 3 800Mhz @ 1260MHz - 1h 19min 25sec 563ms wPrime 1024m]

I dig the "stock cooling" with a vcore over 2.4v.

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge May 2010 thread.]

Dammit Jim!

 

You're granting him shore leave while the warped Barton core is still a wreck?

 

Guess it's up to me to keep these guys entertained until he crawls out of that bottle of scotch....

Lol

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge May 2010 thread.]

I have around 50 Bartons and Tbreds.

Time to get to work.

See you guys in a couple weeks.:celebration:

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

Thanks again.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

Could we fix the silverware and points in these two categories please? No gold in wp1024 and wp32 for a single CPU in the MP 1800+ class. tia:)

 

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Athlon+MP+1800%2B&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1125&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=14&cpu=Athlon+MP+1800%2B&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1125&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

[3DMark 1901 patches= system info error]

Nope. Works fine here. Maybe you got a bad download.

[Happy B-Day,Turrican]

Happy B-day from CP.

[[BUGS] hwbot: Revision 3.5 up and running!]

Haha, that's EXTREME - backup for 0.5 points:D

Hardcore, that's for sure.

[[BUGS] hwbot: Revision 3.5 up and running!]

A backup score for PCmark05 Atlon XP?

 

I couldn't believe it either. Cost me half a point.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

Thanks for cleaning that up as well as you could Thor.

[rickss69 - GMA HD @ 1204/876MHz - 1382 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance]

LOL! HandOverFist...somebody noticed haha. Thanks guys

Somebody's always watching. Knowledge is power.

[rickss69 - GMA HD @ 1204/876MHz - 1382 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance]

Just pulling those scores in 'Hand over Fist' ;)

Good job Rick.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

Would somebody mind checking out the whole Pentium 3 1.0ghz Tualatin catagory, as most of the entries there are NOT Tualatin 1.0. tia

[Rev3 Up and Running - Complaints, Ideas, Ramblings, Comments ... but no bugs]

Excellent! Thank you very much.

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge February 2010 thread.]

Thx for congratulation, I'm very happy today .

You have every reason to be. Outstanding job.:celebration:

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge February 2010 thread.]

Congrats to the winner, and congrats to you Doc for finding the right platform combination to get those big HTT's. You represented CP well.:woot:

[Alex@Lion - NV8 - 443.11 MHz Reference Clock]

It's basically Abit's version of the same board you're running Doc.

[Alex@Lion - NV8 - 443.11 MHz Reference Clock]

NV8.....forgot all about that board. Nice clock on that.

[Bones - Infinity NF4X - 485.16 MHz Reference Clock]

Outstanding. You saved the bigger one for later, right?

[oxyyy - LANparty UT nF3 250Gb - 410.47 MHz Reference Clock]

Lol, no....I guess not.

[PC-Mark05 --> regulate outdated]

It's significantly different from changing the points algorithm.

The results would be the same. The people who benched previously would be left in the dust. IMO, there is no difference.

[PC-Mark05 --> regulate outdated]

We can't increase it just a little bit here and there, that makes no sense. It's better to just leave it at 220, so people who benched it in the past don't get beaten because of a rule change;)

Whys that? It's no different than changing the way hardware points are calculated on older hardware, and nobody hesitated in doing that.

[oxyyy - LANparty UT nF3 250Gb - 410.47 MHz Reference Clock]

You will all be very surprised.

 

I know you will.

Yes, you will.

[How can I monitor my points?]

One more vote for bringing back that page.

[The official HWBOT OC Challenge February 2010 thread.]

Wouldn't it be nice if a sponsor or someone offered up a small trinket to the winner.

A dice pot might be nice. Not mentioning any names of coarse. *hint hint*