Mr.Scott
-
Posts
3337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Mr.Scott
-
-
This is what I mean.
It's one thing to rebel against the system, but in the end you are responsible for what your team members submit to this database. If you feel that certain results are out of line and see that other people are concerned about it, it's your task to make sure the team doesn't look worse than it is.
Of course, you can say you don't care about anyone else than your team and your team members. Sadly enough, the world (and this site) doesn't work that way.
I'm not rebelling against anything. I have my opinion, just like everyone else here does, and I voice it.
And I DON'T care about anybody else but my team here. Why should I? I owe nobody anything here.
Also, are you insinuating my team looks bad? Hahahaha, my team is squeaky clean compared to some here. You need to pick and choose your battles better, instead of singling me and my team out.
Sorry man, I usually show a little more respect to staff members, but right now you're pushing my buttons needlessly.
The last thing I come to a benchmark forum for is a lecture on my attitude and how the world works.
-
I was still joking to relax the atmosphere
Here's a tip: Anytime the word "cheat" is used here, doesn't relax anybody, joke or not. You're off the hook because I sincerely believe you right now.
-
REALLY, did you check post # 7.
If you didn't understand, Opty/American has understood him.
I understand perfectly. Your true colors show in post #18.
-
Thread has to be closed before explode
Why? You promoted it by calling him a cheat. Let's get it out in the open.
-
I showed you a problem, you are the captain of your team, hell I even linked another one in this thread.
The one you linked has no wmv9 on the desktop, it stays. Let it get blocked if you think it's a bugged run.
-
maybe you would like to check the other ones with similar subtest score then?
Maybe you would like me to moderate the entire board then too. If you're in doubt, report them. I'm not about to rifle through every single submission somebody doesn't like. I took care of this one as a show of good faith.
-
Wouldn't one think it's a little ridiculous to pull a blatant cheat for 2 crummy points? Bug maybe, cheat, ridiculous. I'll be a good captain and pull it down though. That should satisfy everybody.
-
You seriously need to change attitude ...
There are more important changes to be made than my attitude. I suggest you concentrate on those. I'll be just fine. Thanks for your opinion though.
-
Take it down Austin. Re-run it without wmv9 on your desktop. Then it will be up to the clowns to actually prove that you used it.
-
why is your video encoding score so high on this and others? did you use the wmv power toy?
Of coarse not. That would be violating the rules.
-
Getting the hang of it now I see. Good job.
-
Really?....how?...by using illegal software tweaks?
-
Thank you Evocarlos, that pretty much validates what my team mate is saying.
-
I understand. It's a valid request.
-
That run is still suspect Christian Ney. Lower sub-scores all around than Evocarlos and with a lesser graphics card? Your HDD General usage time is obscured as are your encoding times. Not saying it's a cheat just saying it looks pretty off to me. It's pretty easy to tweak the 1st multi-thread test using Powertoy you know.
Nothing like calling a spade a spade, is there?
-
Nice job big Al.
-
Points are back, but I'm going to submit a faster one anyway. That way everybody knows I'm on the up and up and there's no more trouble.
-
Most of you know that I'm pretty capable of dealing with a lot of things: jokes, pranks, personal slander, etc ... in most cases I just smile and either congratulate you on the joke (if it was a good one) or give a snappy reply. This avatar, however ... made me a bit uncomfortable.
Not sure whether it's okay for me to feel slightly offended by this avatar. Maybe I should just take this as a joke too? Your feedback, please
.I'm thinking you have bigger fish to fry than censoring avvys.
Christian Ney: I am against too, even if some people hates rev4 changes it s not the right way to kill hwbot puppy. ( I was afraid seeing the pic).
Anyway, if you look at my posts/reply I am always joking on massman, because I love massman(professional relationship). I love his videos, comments an his high capacity to underclock.
But, man how did you kill the puppy, that's very sad
You have some more brown stuff on your nose dude.
-
Understood. Thank you.
-
I have no backup image. I'll delete it and re-run it later if that's what I must do to restore my points that shouldn't have been blocked in the first place. The score isn't out of line for the clocks. Thanks for the info Thor.
-
This submission was blocked because the SS was destroyed by the server crash. You can plainly see that the whole image is distorted including the desktop, not just the applications running on it. I don't think that's very fair. I can report missing/bad shot's too. As a matter of fact I have, and they we're let go.
-
Give 'em hell buddy.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/945051_hs_cpu_z_sempron_2600_athlon_xp_2877_mhz
Not a Sempron, wrong multi. Reported the submissions in CPU-Z, and Wprime32m and 1024m, but there are no screenshots in SPI1m, SPI32m, or Pifast. All were submitted on the same day, so I assume they're all on the same wrong CPU. All should be blocked or moved. tia:)
-
The problem is it's more than one team........me personally I only have proof of one team.
Sure hwbot has proof of many enough for them to want to employ such a drastic change.
TBH the teams doing it must think people are naieve. The only people they are really fooling are themselves.
If the proof is there, why not lay it on the line? Who is being protected that this hasn't been done already?
Wait, lemme guess, some of the heavy hitters that HWBot is planning on using to suck in the manufacturers.
MrPaco - Opteron 165 90nm @ 3006.7MHz - 26sec 31ms wPrime 32m
in Result Discussions
Posted
Now you're cookin Paco.