-
Posts
2268 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by yosarianilives
-
-
Hypers are weirdly bad on sandy, I think that the bioses don't have subtimings set correctly for them. I've even seen where psc just inexplicably scores higher than hypers despite hypers appearing to overall being set tighter.
-
Result looks in line to me, it's about 20k above a 7960x (pasted version of 9960x), but the 7960x score is at 5 ghz vs the 9960x at 5.9 ghz. Also the 9960x is at 1800 mhz mem with much tighter timings vs the 7960x is at 1700 mhz mem with fairly loose timings. I think on clocks alone you could make the difference even before OS effi.
If there's anything "wrong" with this sub it's that it's a benchmate score which iirc has it's own ranking, but I don't know if the older version of benchmate would mean the score should get moved or not.
-
I don't know that this is a high priority bug but on multi day gpupi 32b scores an extra day is added to the listed time. In the rankings it's fine, it's just on the hw page and the score page that it shows up inacurate. Example
- 1
-
1 hour ago, keeph8n said:
afaik, 3D does NOT have any OS limitations which both of the Stages in question falls under
That's only for Futuremark benches with a valid link, aqua and superposition generally require win 7 on non lake cpus with bclk adjustment which in practice is all non lake cpus with some exceptions such as apus.
-
3 hours ago, unityofsaints said:
Tess off is allowed for FS though? Unknown hardware may be unavoidable on this laptop.
You can't disable tess for the comp, if the hardware is unknown (cpu not recognized, gpu not recognized) then make sure that "windows management instrumentation" service is enabled. Also try an older driver, make sure it's a whql one. The service usually fixes cpu not recognized, gpu not recognized would be a driver issue.
-
Time flies when you're having fun
-
That is a very strong core, and I know it's not just about a strong core on these chips too
-
-
Your mem is holding you back, should be more like 6500 at that cpu clock. On these 6 cores it's 90% a mem bench and around 4.5 ghz core it's 100% a mem bench.
-
Single core boost 5 Ghz, all core 4277. Score increased with single core boost enabled so assuming it ran some part of the bench at full 5
-
Daaamn, remind me how shit my 550 is lol
-
-
Please add motherboard HP 80FD http://valid.x86.fr/tbyhv8
-
Not only is this a chip with great mhz (most for this chip on this bench iirc) the effi is excellent too. Shame there was not the trifecta of also managing cl3 at 500 somehow.
-
17 hours ago, funsoul said:
Good on yosarian! Yeah....not having an endless juice supply is a bummmer hehe
It has been remedied, I have a fresh dewar going into the weekend although obviously won't waste it revisiting a chip that we already know isn't a winner I have i3 4170 and a number of ayymd chips that could use some juice.
-
Holy fuck, time to pack it up bois the pros are here
-
I'm going to ask the question that I'm sure is on a few people's mind. If benchmate no longer includes geekbench then how will this affect the teamcup ddr4 stage for geekbench 4 with benchmate? @Leeghoofd
-
4 hours ago, MaddMutt said:
Nice run out of that OLD (ROFL) Hardware
Run probably would've been more efficient had I been able to find my hypers but psc isn't terrible at deneb mhz. Perhaps someday I'll have time to bin for 6 ghz on core as well. Also wouldn'tve hurt my chances at testing more things if I hadn't emptied the very last of my ln2 into the pot just as the bench ended
-
Burning the last of my ln2, didn't have enough left for a 4k run
-
burning the last of my ln2
-
Burning the last of my ln2
-
imc is meh and effi is atrocious, but doesn't matter when you outclock everyone
-
32 minutes ago, Noxinite said:
Nice core, but effi is still not the best.
Lend me your mem and an acronis image of your os and I think we have gold
- 1
-
Second core is weak, but that's easily fixed with msconfig. Just need better mem and can gold
- 1
yosarianilives - Core i7 3770 @ 4674MHz - 21.793 fps HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p
in Result Discussions
Posted