rbuass
V.I.P.
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by rbuass
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes,,, mainly if his own confirm that did it... And...for sure...be banned more than one month for this
-
Yes sure...a noob have no experience to post. But a Team member from the Top Dogs league, for sure, know what is your own results and what is not made from him. Further... we are talking about only one of the lots of coincidences. I was forced to bench 2 times to go to MOA, because people found coincidences...and NOBODY has no one proof. For now, there are a shared result...that's the question
-
Sorry, but I have enough reason to post. Please...do you REALLY believe is a "mistake"???. Can a professional overclocker with fantastic scores make this kind of mistakes? I am not talking about punishment, ban, and others...just talking I do not believe it's a mistake. What Hwbot will do or not to do, is not my problem, but I see real arguiments here. If you don't give no one punishment, Is not my problem. I just complained before because when it happens with us, we were forced to prove something that there were no one proof. Now, I understand all the guys was complaining.
-
-
-
-
-
Hi friends. I got new score and earn 3D WR points. Please check http://hwbot.org/submission/2311447_rbuass_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_680_51296_marks Thanks in advance
-
-
Thanks friend
-
-
I posted the screenshot. And the URL (validation) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm06/16863341 Please check the WR points. Thanks in advance
-
PLease....add WR points for this submission http://hwbot.org/submission/2311256_rbuass_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_680_50980_marks Best regards
-
Congratulations to all... I am sure we will have amazing days in Taiwan... Best regards
-
Don't you think some things like this: About the SuperPI 32M It's been confirmed with Mad222 and John Lam that these two results do in fact originate from the same system. Can encourage people to think this way???...
-
When I asked MSI, after we were required, they did not know nothing about our problem... They told me... Don't worry Ronaldo...we believe in you... Even... we agreed to bench again I don't want to discuss with you...because you have a hard work there and I know is not easy to control lots of things that can happen in Hwbot. Good lucky to solve the problem... I just told all things I think was needed.
-
I did not accuse Mad or John. I only told that when it happens with me and Gnidaol... we are forced to prove....and now... you told is different because you told is different size. I simply told that in my point of view...is EXACLTY the same case...and FOR SURE they can do it again...
-
Ok friend... But one more time...when this happens with us... we are forced to bench again in Live Stream with absolutely 0 proof ... Can you tell me why?
-
HWBOT request to me and Gnidaol to prove our results???...and if we do not proved in Live Stream told us that it was be removed??? If we could not be able to do the scores again? Don't you think you are using two different ways to solve the same case? Massman told is 2 different sizes....and i strongly not agree...because our moral worth many more than a trip to Taiwan. If we had not achieved the results, we would be considered cheaters, and our moral worth much more than the results, or a trip to Taiwan. Se we were required to prove our results to MOA ... with much less evidences. We had different SOs, different validation Key, different BIOS, different subtimings (with a same board), different SSDs, and even to prove was needed. Sorry, but who was hurt, was me and Gnidaol ... nobody was under our skins, and only we know what we go through. Now ... if you ask me if I think the I will reply: No. .. since one can not prove ever, there is not a rule...the rule serves only to prevent but not to ban... HWBOT can ask to be mandatory to prove the result in some way (videos, pics... I don't know) ... Than worth a rule that you can not prove?? If Hardware Sharing can not be proved ever...is completelly an useless rule IMHO - Hardware Sharing - useless - what is the difference in terms of knowledge and quality from an overclocker? What is the difference if he bought, earned, borrowed or binned? The way the rules are today much favor those who have more money and conditions to buy more pc parts. The rule of Hardware Sharing only protects them ... because people who have few conditions often could break records if they could borrow parts from their friends. One more time...I consider is not a Hwbot fault...but I think is almost impossible to manage and create rules to fix all issues, but I think is time to think about it.
-
I believe the HWBOT has increasingly improved way to verify the results. I know it's impossible to have rules that will be fair 100% to everyone, but something must be done to respect that. Any guy knows that it is very easy to get the results from another...is just to change important things like BCLK, Ratio, timings, background and so on. It is impossible to prove whether a processor is borrowed, or was used the same hardware. You can create a rule only to inhibit, but not for ensure. If I borrow a gold processor for a friend, it is impossible to be discovered ... and this applies to the rules of 2D. Tell me ... if I lend a processor for a friend ... a 6900 MHz chip;;;, and my friend get 6950 MHz;;, he does not deserve the credit??....and if he get 6850 Mhz... he does not deserve the credit? Does the problem is the hardware sharing or screenshot sharing? Why some people can not afford, or can not binned, or can not find a gold CPU or VGA, mean he did not deserve to be on the top....even if is a great overclock with a great knowledge? It is really very difficult and almost impossible to prove ... but evidence of Slamms are actually very strong. ATM to be in the top, did not mean that is a top overclocker...but for sure to have the best PC parts. Only my 2 cents...