IanCutress

Seems rough... Lucky n00b got 1st, 1st, 6th, overall 2nd T0lsty got 5th, 9th, 1st, overall 1st Congrats to all

I've never had problems with a fresh OS install. dot net 4.0?

Noooo my team points OH wait, DJ took those already Nice one

Ticket ID: 1794 Priority: Low Just a thought. I wanted to see the best records for a bit of hardware (Z87X-OC). Would it be great if the item page ( http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z87x-oc/ ) listed the best scores (in terms of points, WR+GL+HW+CP) that people had achieved with it?\r\n\r\nThat also lends to the following scope: a WR page showing what hardware had the most WR / WR Points. I bet vendors would love that.\r\n\r\n-borandi

Backstory: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2013/10/03/here_2700_s-what-it-will-cost-new-pc-owners-to-play-watch-dogs.aspx

Change your BIOS to only run single core, or change msconfig. Multithreaded scores take a dive sure, but if you're the only one submitting... Basically you need a script to change the affinity to a single core at that point in the bench.

Damn that CPU !

Need 8Packs CPU :-)

Also, no CPU-Z tabs in your screenshot

Yes, the multiplier is for the number of physical sockets on board. 3820 is one socket.

Send it over here, I'm sure I can find a use for it

He had two CPU-Z windows open, not in the screenshot for some reason

Out of interest, is it new scores only this time, or are older submissions valid?

Is it some form of internal RAID doing the AMD bug?

Can change the CPU listing now

Ticket ID: 1781 Priority: Low Arrrrgh-m\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/a/t0h202

"Only use the 2396,2689,2956,29572495,2743 processor." ?

Easy. Read the post that already answered your question. Apply common sense.

shiiit if I hadn't been moving house and relying on dialup speeds Reserve me a spot just in case it falls through

Ticket ID: 1769 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/a/0xl674\r\n\r\nFrom the ever popular SGS2.\r\n\r\nNow that CPU-Z on Android offers validation, are we accepting CPU-Z Frequency submissions for these?

If you're going for BCLK submits, keep one thread loaded. It'll accept the highest CPU Frequency per CPU, or wait 10 mins to cool.

Kabini ftw

It doesn't probe all bits of the CPU like Prime95/LinX, just normal arithmetic adds, divides, bitshifts et al. Almost memory agnostic too, just requires CPU speed

Here's a benchmark I wrote over a year ago, and I've been using it in my reviews ever since. Simply put, it is based on 3D Random Movement algorithms. There are a fair few when looking at the literature, and all use a variety of different mathematical formula to achieve the same result. Some are more trigonmetric heavy, some use random numbers generated using normal or variable distribution algorithms. When moving a single item a few spots, the speed of each algorithm is of no concern, but when you move into scientific computing and have to deal with billions, having the best algorithm for the job is on the table. So this is the 3D Particle Movement benchmark, 3DPM for short, which uses 6 of these algorithms so find the best speeds. The benchmark comes in two varieties: a) 3DPM-ST: Single Thread mode, where one thread is generated b) 3DPM-MT: MutliThread mode, where the CPU has to be able to cope with >10000 threads. If anyone is interested, I am in the process of organising integration of this benchmark into HWBot. Submissions to HWBot will be the usual CPU submission process - screenshot with CPU-Z of CPU and CPU-Z of Memory. The benchmark does produce an file, which I will be writing a website for shortly. But for now, here are the poignant links: Still in alpha phase on HWBot, for now Results page for 3DPM-ST: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dpm-st Results page for 3DPM-MT: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dpm-mt The download page: http://www.borandi.co.uk/3DPM Submission for 3DPM-ST: http://hwbot.org/submit/benchmark/3DPM-ST Submission for 3DPM-MT: http://hwbot.org/submit/benchmark/3DPM-MT Edit: For those wondering why AMD doesn't score so high... AMD architecture loves integer (whole number) operations, especially when parallel. This benchmark was written in floating point (FP) operations, which is the usual standard for scientific programming depending on the algorithm.