Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

mickulty

Members
  • Content Count

    536
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

mickulty last won the day on May 17 2019

mickulty had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

225 Excellent

About mickulty

  • Rank
    grunt bot

Converted

  • Location
    United Kingdom

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. DDR3L isn't relevant here, that's just DDR3 at a different voltage. LPDDR3 is different. I cannot stress enough that DDR3L and LPDDR3 are not interchangeable terms! Fundamentally LPDDR3 is not a Low Power version of DDR3. Rather, it is the third version of LPDDR memory, like how we have GDDR memory. This applies to other generations as well, from LPDDR1 to LPDDR5. The biggest difference I'd point to when it comes to LPDDR3 specifically is that the command/address bus is double data rate, as well as the data bus. Regular DDR isn't getting a double data rate cad bus until DDR5. H
  2. I'm surprised you got a xeon to OC properly in that thing. Also, try a different GPU/slot maybe?
  3. I guess now the people asking if it helps to remove memory slots have their answer.
  4. Typo in the memory batch? Presumably should be -10B not -01B. Nice score BTW
  5. "I'm required to list a price but just want offers" GLWS, I'd be interested if it was EU
  6. Yeah, personally I don't think such a trivial thing should be a reason to remove a score that isn't claiming a record or getting a significant amount of globals. No-one would think for a minute the score is in any way cheated/fake. Also frankly it wouldn't surprise me if some of my past scores have the same mistake.
  7. I assume he's looking at the fact that the score isn't visible in cinebench's comparison graph
  8. Hahaha yes, this. I'm in favour of all ycruncher stages but this in particular.
  9. ^this would be brilliant, @keeph8n has a great voice
×
×
  • Create New...