![](https://community.hwbot.org/uploads/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Strunkenbold
-
Posts
2209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Strunkenbold
-
-
On 9/25/2020 at 4:12 PM, Speedy22 said:
-
On 9/5/2020 at 6:59 PM, Bayline1 said:
Hello
Please add:
Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF
Already there even though someone misspelled it "AROUS", so here we are:
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z390_aorus_master_cf/
-
On 10/12/2020 at 12:52 AM, Blost said:
Previously all GT2 parts were UHD Graphics 6xx. Now the mobile parts are just UHD Graphics, even though they are GT2. Good idea Intel! More chaos for the db.
This should be now the best guess category for the above chip:
https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/uhd_graphics_mobile_comet_lake_24eu/
We need to do a big clean up of those intel and amd stuff.
-
1
-
-
I think we have neither
On 10/8/2020 at 9:17 PM, Sir_Nobs_of_rone_II. said:Could you post a GPU screenshot or validation? Im curios how GPU-Z identifies these parts.
-
Moved. For CPUs its enough to just post a link to the Intel ark. Please dont submit a result if there is no category for- it destroys our rankings in the long run.
-
-
On 9/3/2020 at 7:51 PM, Don_Dan said:
(or change all other Dark boards to full capital letters :) )
No, I'm too lazy for this.
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z490_dark_131_cl_e499_kr/
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z490_ftw_wifi_122_cl_e497_kr/
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/z490_dark_kingpin_edition_131_cl_e499_kp/
-
On 9/3/2020 at 6:40 PM, deOCer said:
Please add the new Sabrent Rocket 4.0 M.2 SSD Series
https://www.sabrent.com/rocket-nvme-4-0/
Thanks
-
1
-
-
-
-
Added:
https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/hd_graphics_500_mobile_apollo_lake/
Official name from Intel is HD Graphics 500. Of course GPU-Z reads something else (probably because of the driver)...
-
1
-
-
I think there was a similar issue on 3850 and I simply solved it by flashing an already unlocked GPU bios. Dont know how the situation is with 2600XT though.
-
On 8/8/2020 at 11:08 AM, bartx said:
What do you guys now about Epox 8RDAx PRO boards? There is almost no info about them, looks like they were the latest Epox boards on S462. I think they may have different MCP.
For sure they have better CPU VRM, 4 chokes instead of 3 and quite a lot of Mosfets in RAM VRM.
From pictures it looks like they really used new pcb revisions for those boards: 1.2 and 1.4. VRM looks indeed different.
8RDA3 range from rev1.1 over 2.1 to 3.1.
3.1 has really small mosfets and used some kind of "mosefet cooling on the pcb". The Pro boards seem to have the same but stronger VRM.
Rev2.1 and under could give 2.0V to CPUs but newer revisions were a bit lower AFAIR. Nforce NB should be late 2003 or newer and might be capable of nice FSB. -
Got response from CPU-Z now. They will now report Raven for the Athlon 3000G in the next version. No word on LPDDR yet.
-
1
-
-
Wrong vali or typo? 210 vs 213 MHz
-
Sadly no response from CPU-Z authors, neither on the LPDDR or 3000G issue yet.
-
1
-
-
Its often confusing which category to choose for the IGP part of a APU, so here is a incomplete list to help find you the correct one.
AMD choose to change their name scheme in 2020. Before we had Radeon Vega 3 to 11 Graphics, now it's just "Radeon Graphics" independent of existing shaders. Also there is actually "RX Vega" for everything from Vega 10 but for some reason and for some cards they omitted that.
In late 2019 they introduced with the Athlon 3000G a new entry level CPU featuring a native 2 core die with a 3 CU graphics part in the desktop market. But for some very strange reason, they want to let the world believe that this one is a Picasso part, yet delidding shows that this is actually the same core like the embedded Banded Kestrel, which is also known as Dali in the consumer market and AMD itself says 14nm on its HP. Speculations are that those CPUs should be using harvested Picasso dies but the yield of those chips was too good and they made a last minute decision and used Dali cores instead. This is very confusing and almost all detection tools give wrong information. We have the situation that CPU-Z reports "Picasso" while GPU-Z says "Raven Ridge". Sadly we got no real response from CPU-Z authors to fix the incorrect reporting. Looks like they wait for official response from AMD on that matter. Anyway without knowing too much about technical details, those chips are are something between Raven Ridge and Picasso but overclocking wise it's not really making a difference. 14nm vs 12nm is actually more important. So that's why those Dali chips go in the same category as Raven Ridge.
-
10
-
2
-
-
On 7/27/2020 at 7:05 AM, Leeghoofd said:
K keep me posted bro once I need to move things around plz. Maybe we go with what gpuz lists. Confusing stuff though lol
This should be all belong to Picasso: https://url.hwbot.org/33xL1Wv
All other categories should now correctly created although it might be hard for users to find the correct category. Wish we had already a feature to match the IGP automatically to the used CPU.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Please, if its not possible to find an exact match of your hardware, make a request in the support section. This is not a Vega 6 with Raven core. Moved your sub now although the GPU-Z main screen is missing.
-
When "not recognized" appears, I guess you tried submitting a result with Aquamark, Benchmate or GPU PI which provide prefiled data for hwbot? Those programs try to make the submitting process as straightforward as possible. Usually it should you require one click to have your result up. But when your hardware cannot be matched to existing hardware database entries, they stop and requires the user to make some manual adjustments in the submit process. "Not recognized" is a little bit misleading though as it doesn't necessarily mean that the hardware isn't in the database, the user can match his hardware manually in the submit form. The user simply needs to be persistent enough to try.
-
Well if it's the intention to have another ranking for memory records, a missing way to detect LPPDR is probably the show stopper. On the other hand, this could be also added, just to be more exact. We know that some SoCs use LPDDR. But currently, they stand with regular DDR memory in our db. We would be able to offer more correct information for those. But as we are more a overclocking database than a technical database, it wouldn't be much of a benefit I guess.
But if it's possible to detect this properly, I don't see why we shouldn't do this. Even though I don't expect much of it -overclocking wise. (But honestly don't know much about those stuff, so I actually cant judge.) Has anyone already asked CPU-Z devs about this? Maybe we should postpone discussion till we have an answer here. I guess they would first need to find a way to properly detect this + making lot of testing.
42 minutes ago, mickulty said:CPU-Z not being able to tell the difference is a problem, and it's something the CPUID guys ought to look at. It's not the first time there's a problem with CPU-Z, it still calls the Athlon 3000G 12nm Picasso, it's 14nm and a 2-core die.
Well the issue seems to be, that regular Picasso and the 3000G share exact the same CPUID. This ID is should be Picasso only and as we all know the difference to Raven Ridge is the Die shrink to 12nm + some minor modification. The core of the 3000G was already identified as Dali and AMD itself states 14nm for this CPU. But for some reason AMD _wants_ to let all people believe it is pure Picasso which it simply can't be.
Anyway the identical ID is the problem why CPU-Z detects it wrong. I contacted CPU-Z author about the problem and hope for an answer.
AFAIU from this file in AMD Linux driver, the Dali IGP shares also the same Device ID like Picasso, 15D8. But they doing some code dance to separate Raven2, Pollock and Dali from pure Picasso party, mainly by reading Asic revision. Unfortunately this seems to be not the same Revision which GPU-Z shows us.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Thanks for your work! Seems it least for Vega 8, there wasn't too much to do, so I exaggerated. But there are still other Vega GPUs which have a Raven Ridge and a Picasso part. Im working on separate them. Currently I stopped at Vega 3. Have yet to wait on some clarification first but fun starts with Athlon 3000G. Is its Vega 3 GPU a Picasso or Raven Ridge?:
CPU-Z: Picasso
GPU-Z: Raven Ridge
TPU GPU-DB https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-vega-3.c3594: Picasso
AMD: 14nm, so it's really Raven Ridge?
German magazine https://www.computerbase.de/2019-11/amd-athlon-3000g-test/: Its Banded Kestrel! Used GPU? No information.
Later Dali die was released and I think it's just another name for Banded Kestrel. Mainly the difference between Embedded and Low Cost segment. There seems to be no official information from AMD yet. So Im guessing its Dali Die with Raven Ridge or Raven Ridge 2 GPU part. -
-
2 hours ago, Sparks.nl said:
I have got some golden dragons which do 260 2-2-2-5 2t on nf2. And 1 XL kit makes it up to 260-265 c2.5 boot as well.
Nice kit you've got there. CL2 @ 260Mhz ? Thats crazy.
PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:
in Support
Posted
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p7xxtm1/