Strunkenbold

regarding LGA1156 ACHIEVEMENTS it seems it currently doesnt take into account the xeon x34xx series. look here: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/981002_strunkenbold_superpi_32m_xeon_x3440_8min_20sec_792ms I dont even received points for the hardware achievement.

This problem is still unresolved: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/942987_strunkenbold_3dmark_2005_geforce_6600_ddr_agp_3899_marks 3rd in the ranking, but second in the the top list. There was a result which was moved/removed because it was submitted to the wrong section. It has successfully disappeared from the list but it seems its still receiving points. One more thing: Lets say your are in the 3dmark06 tab, you click on a result in the list and after viewing it you hit the back button of your browser. Your are still in the 3dmark06 tab but the results are the ones of 3dmark01! After that the hwbot engine is completly confused.

and finally: http://hwbot.org/hardware/manufacturer/amd?tab=2drankings reference clock and maxxmem results arent displayed because they are probably wrongly linked to wprime32

Another thing: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6600_ddr_agp?tab=rankings#3dmark_2005 In the ranking Im 2nd but if you click on my result, Im just 3rd.... Same thing here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3440?tab=2drankings#cpu-z Im 3rd but it ranks me 4th

...tried today serveral times but it wasnt possible to do this flawless. 1st problem: you have to always fill in the memory type manually, though its already filled in by maxxmem 2nd problem: maxxmem also filled correct in my cpu (xeon x3440) but after submission its always a Xeon W35xx so lets edit this and we come to problem nr 3: after editing: "not Strunkenbold’s best MaxxMem DDR3 submission, only best is ranked." wtf? this _is_ my best result.... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979105_strunkenbold_maxxmem_ddr3_1389.4_marks

its actually a mobo request.... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1059043

Ticket ID: 831 Priority: Low http://www.msi-computer.de/index.php?func=proddesc&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=&cat3_no=&prod_no=219\r\n\r\nthx

rofl, all they want from us is our beer...

thx!

any progress?

Ticket ID: 759 Priority: Low http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/47kqd/\r\n\r\nAFAIK only one manufactor ever made a card like this: XpertVision

In the rankings, its named h20 (zero at the end). This is wrong.

Ticket ID: 727 Priority: Low Its h2o \r\no for Oxygen!

Ok but then is the ranking wrong. It should ignore the third digit. It just looks strange.

Bug still there. May I should describe it better. He has better time (by 0,01sec) and is one place better ranked. This is so far correct. But I still got the points if I would one place better.

link seems to be fixed. typo is still there.

Yes because it doesnt play a role, most of the time atleast. Common you even made a section for 140 tdp AMD Phenom II X4 965 and one for the 125 watt one! And here you cant even prove someone actually owns that piece of hardware. (thats why there are many duplicate entries in the sections) Back to the 7600GT, the building process makes them (even physical) different hardware.

You mean different factory clocks? Thats not why I tried to tell. A2 and B1 revision is chip wise the same but B1 is built in 80nm which makes them overclocking wise not comparable.

Ticket ID: 638 Priority: Low I think now that hwbot has a fulltime worker, projects like this can be accomplished. \r\n\r\nReasons:\r\nB1 revision is much more overclock friendly then A2, almost 100mhz more core clock all the time due to the better building process.

Ticket ID: 637 Priority: Low Just look at place 11 & 12. A bug in the engine?

Ticket ID: 636 Priority: Low If you click on the chipset link on any nforce 3 250 mobo specific site it will tell you: \"No hardware found, please be more specific.\" \r\nLook here for instance:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nf325_a7\r\n\r\nAlso theres a typo;\r\nsocket: unkown (unknown)

Im on Win7 64bit.

Ticket ID: 612 Priority: Low We already have X3450 and X3470\r\nStill need to add:\r\n\r\nX3430\r\nX3440\r\nX3460\r\nL3426\r\n\r\nhttp://www.intel.com/cd/products/services/emea/deu/processors/xeon3000/specifications/344504.htm

I got it working, still having 64bit media encoder installed. I just had to run PCMark with win vista compatibility mode.

I wonder how you can obtain a score on an 64Bit system, as 3dmark05 doesnt accept 64bit media encoder and the 32bit one wont install...