Strunkenbold

Last guess for today: We dont create an extra section for this. As those people could buy them an qm77 notebook?

Ok qm77 has oc support. But just for cpu or gpu also?

Ok fine. But still you can't plug mobile chips in a Z77 mobo. So whats the solution now?

This is what I found here FB - 100kOhm VSEN1 - 50kohm (OVP @ 115% DAC = 2.05V I tried it some years ago, FB works but cant get higher than 1.8xV before mobo gets very unstable. Probably I did the OVP mod wrong.

IIRC the HD3000 in the desktop variant has more options to change clock speed. Just like a free multi. The mobile chips remain at 650Mhz and lower. So actually this should qualify for an extra HD3000 mobile section, although this may be just a limitation by the mobile chipsets.

oh I just thought all voodoos suffers from the 16bit limitation... I was wrong than. Thx for enlighten me! So we only lock out Voodoo3 and under.

To bad he cant get any points on Hwbot for it. Though, it wouldnt be a big deal to allow 16Bit 3DMark2001 runs for voodoo cards only. Atleast nobody gets hurt.... Anyway, fantastic work!

Any update / progress / comment from staff on this?

What I wanted to say is, it would be more comfortable to have this implemented in the rankings. Like this: Family: All | Intel | s478 | Pentium 4 | Pentium 4 3,0Ghz Prescott Also search has some bugs: -click on a result opens a new tab (which is correct) but also opens the result in the search tab (which is twice) -searching for socket a gives no results (because s462 also exists) -best am2 submission is a Phenom X2 555BE (??) -searching for s478 mixes results with Socket P and most annoying: It actually doesnt give you the best results! Look s2011 for instance

If you look closer to the result I posted, you see that the top score is done with 64k threads and non-sse. How is that to explain? Also the "trick" with many threads is unexplainable. From wprime we know that creating that many threads on a single core cpu costs very much time. Why are the scores in UCBench getting better then? Tweaking ram or cpu for better results also dont make sense, cause you can just rerun the bench and hope for some fancy result popping up. (which will usually do and you beat much better configs)

Yes they are all 989. Some are even in its correct category the rest is at 1156

Submission is reported because its in the wrong hardware category.

Hi, it was not my intention to make you angry. But as a matter of fact your entry doesnt belong to this category. HD3000 is almost double speed, compared to clarkdale/arrendale. Desktop and mobile Sandy's are technically the same. Both feature 12EUs. But youre right that performance wise, these are not comparable. Maybe some of the mods find a solution.

Bugs: -Phenom achievement doesnt work -socket 1156 pentiums and xeons doesnt count for the 1156 achievements -some arrandale mobile cpu's are listed as socket 1156, should be 989 -clicking on cpu core in hardware browser results in a 404 Features: -possibility to sort cpu benchmark results by socket, to find out which is the fastest of s478 for instance edit: -remove ucbench from hwbot as calculations seems to be buggy -results are more coincidence as everything else, good example here (sse2 is slower than non-sse), many threads makes better results- there is no plausible explanation for this

The situation in the GMA 950 mobile section is even more complicated. There are lots of results with Intel Atom processors that have his own category. The name of this category seems to be also wrong as atom uses 945GSE and it seems that GPU-Z is reporting things incorrectly. To make things even more interesting there are also results with 64bit memory interface (non atom) resulting of single channel ram (because these devices have just one ram slot). Also I dont understand the cryptic naming pattern. Wouldnt it be easier to make just 3 categorys like that: Intel GMA 950 (desktop) Intel GMA 950 (mobile) Intel GMA 950 (mobile) 64bit

From time to time Ive been looking through these and I see lots of results in the wrong category's . In the GMA HD (Clarkdale) section do people continuously posting results with sandybridge cpus and even some results with arrandale cpus. The same for GMA HD mobile (Arrandale). People seems to dont know that there is no mobile sandy bridge section. As even the mobile one's are like the desktop HD2000 & HD3000 gpu's. Ive been already reporting some of these but there are many and I hope that a result moderator can go through all of these.

The one with your mobo.

Great, cpu affinity is also implanted. Nice to see...

Ticket ID: 1604 Priority: Low http://www.motherboard.cz/mb/epox/EP-4PDA3I.htm\r\n\r\nthx!

Forget to say, used cpuz 1.61.8 beta from October 24. Nice Christian, hope that cpuz improves further!

Good News, error seems to be gone. Currently Im on a Epox 478 mobo, which had the same issue like the Asus A8N and everything is working correctly now.

Actually we're bugging the test with running it with Vista/7 as there was no Aero when pcmark05 was developed and than we trick it again by running Internet Explorer 7,8,9. In both cases calculation gets done which was not intended by the devs. While this maybe excused by the technical advance during the years, allowing registry tweaks cant be the way to go. It simply leads to no rendering in transp windows and IE of rendering blank white pages as the same like video compression calcs something that is less demanding than audio compression. Dont get it, why dont we just drop this bench? Only thing we do here is restrict "super tweaks" but we're still not run the bench like it was intended. And I fear this isnt even possible today.

Gain by Bobs Tweak is remarkable. (50% to 100% iirc)

Didnt read through all of this but I assume; -different Internet Explorer settings not allowed? -Bobs tweak allowed?

There is a bug when editing a submission. There was .078 in the field but after editing, HWBOT ignores the zero and it gets .780.