Strunkenbold

Ticket ID: 1154 Priority: Low Most Arrandale cpus are in the general core i3 section....

only 44k? I achieved 105k lolz

Pifast 4.3 used (look at folder on desktop).... Its about 10seconds faster than 4.1

Ticket ID: 1060 Priority: Low When you are already at it, you can add Lanparty pro875B also. thx!

IMO, this is wrong. I bought a 465 with a GF100-030-A3 GPU but you got a 465 with GF100-275-A3 GPU, which is a 470gtx GPU. This is simply not the same hardware.

Totally agree here.

As we have no other benchmark to test with this card, I guess nobody gets hurt.

We all know that the voodoo3 cant run 3dmark with default settings. But we have somehow a category for it on hwbot and since the card doesnt play a role in global rankings, wouldnt it be wise to make an exception here?

Ticket ID: 963 Priority: Low http://active-hardware.com/english/reviews/mainboard/ax37-plus.htm

regarding LGA1156 ACHIEVEMENTS it seems it currently doesnt take into account the xeon x34xx series. look here: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/981002_strunkenbold_superpi_32m_xeon_x3440_8min_20sec_792ms I dont even received points for the hardware achievement.

This problem is still unresolved: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/942987_strunkenbold_3dmark_2005_geforce_6600_ddr_agp_3899_marks 3rd in the ranking, but second in the the top list. There was a result which was moved/removed because it was submitted to the wrong section. It has successfully disappeared from the list but it seems its still receiving points. One more thing: Lets say your are in the 3dmark06 tab, you click on a result in the list and after viewing it you hit the back button of your browser. Your are still in the 3dmark06 tab but the results are the ones of 3dmark01! After that the hwbot engine is completly confused.

and finally: http://hwbot.org/hardware/manufacturer/amd?tab=2drankings reference clock and maxxmem results arent displayed because they are probably wrongly linked to wprime32

Another thing: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6600_ddr_agp?tab=rankings#3dmark_2005 In the ranking Im 2nd but if you click on my result, Im just 3rd.... Same thing here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3440?tab=2drankings#cpu-z Im 3rd but it ranks me 4th

...tried today serveral times but it wasnt possible to do this flawless. 1st problem: you have to always fill in the memory type manually, though its already filled in by maxxmem 2nd problem: maxxmem also filled correct in my cpu (xeon x3440) but after submission its always a Xeon W35xx so lets edit this and we come to problem nr 3: after editing: "not Strunkenbold’s best MaxxMem DDR3 submission, only best is ranked." wtf? this _is_ my best result.... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979105_strunkenbold_maxxmem_ddr3_1389.4_marks

its actually a mobo request.... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1059043

Ticket ID: 831 Priority: Low http://www.msi-computer.de/index.php?func=proddesc&maincat_no=1&cat2_no=&cat3_no=&prod_no=219\r\n\r\nthx

rofl, all they want from us is our beer...

thx!

any progress?

Ticket ID: 759 Priority: Low http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/47kqd/\r\n\r\nAFAIK only one manufactor ever made a card like this: XpertVision

In the rankings, its named h20 (zero at the end). This is wrong.

Ticket ID: 727 Priority: Low Its h2o \r\no for Oxygen!

Ok but then is the ranking wrong. It should ignore the third digit. It just looks strange.

Bug still there. May I should describe it better. He has better time (by 0,01sec) and is one place better ranked. This is so far correct. But I still got the points if I would one place better.

link seems to be fixed. typo is still there.