Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Bobnova

Members
  • Posts

    515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bobnova

  1. I think I found the external bits of the internal VRM. If I did, it's EPower time.

    First thing though is getting an install on there that will actually overclock.

    I'll post a few pictures in a bit here, need to take 'em and do some classy MSPaint work.

     

     

    EDIT:

    Here we go:

    PiOC-top.jpg

    PiOC-bottom.jpg

     

    Your mileage may vary, void where prohibited by law, not responsible for bad descisions, etc.

    I have a hell of a time making SD cards, so it may be a bit till I can test this.

    Putting some appropriate voltage caps across those two MLC jobs may well help, there's about 10mV of switching ripple on the VARM line, plus any transient ripple at higher loads. This is all at idle (no display attached, no Ethernet attached, booting to a command prompt I'd assume.), load ripple will be higher. Of course, more caps may blow things to hell, who knows.

     

     

     

     

    If you do and it is Varm and you make WRs, if you could credit me that'd be great :D

  2. I'm more concerned about another point bearing benchmark that caps at 4 cores, and one that doesn't support windows OCing despite being a windows OCing program.

     

    I realize it's Intel and a massive opportunity, but it got points far too soon IMO.

  3. Change "complaining" to "disagreeing" if you like. I would call what you are doing complaining, however.

    Regardless, rather than saying that you don't like it and leaving it at that, tell us what YOU would do if YOU were in charge.

    How would YOU "fix" things?

     

     

    Example: I'm looking at shirts. They're green. I don't like green, I like black.

    If I want the manufacturer to change colors, should I say "Green shirts are junk"?

    Or should I say "These shirts would be more awesome if they were black"?

    If you were the manufacturer, which would you listen to? The negative person that says they're junk, or the more helpful person that suggests a fix?

     

    So far all I've seen you say is that points for "low participation" categories are junk. I haven't seen any suggestions on what you think should be done, only statements that you don't like how it's been done right now.

  4. I am not talking about overclocking under LN2.

    I am talking about people that get easy points... with hardware that nobody has.

    Lots of obscure CPUs and even videocards ..... and NOT under LN2.

    Also I am not talking about Pro League where I am part... but XOC and also enthusiast.

    There are LOTS of obscure CPUs like Core i7 4700MQ, i3 3217U, A10 4600M..., LOTS, ..., giving easy points and cups.

    About global obscure hardware...Sergio posted this some time ago.

    http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=43389

    And almost nobody agreed... regardless I did not consider an owner fault (for sure)... I consider a fail in the rules...

    So... this is my opinion, and I can not change because I really believe is the right way...

    If Hwbot will follow or no... is into Hwbot right, but is not my way of view.

     

    Instead of complaining about not liking it, tell us how you would set it up.

    How many submissions would you set the engine to require before scores got points?

  5. Low participation gold cup: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2162972_

    To get that required modding the card (no published mods), then coming up with a heatsink worth a crap (used a SS7 K6 heatsink, drilled new holes, got it lined up, etc.), then actually running the damn thing. Not quick and easy by any means.

     

    Another low participation gold cup: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2164676_

    More unpublished mods, dry ice cooling, and a head to head battle for first. All for two points.

     

    Both took effort, significantly more effort than buying a lightning, strapping a pot to it and pouring in LN2.

     

    Oh wait, then there's this one: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2168802_

    That one I cast and machined a custom pot for because it has a goofy bolt pattern.

     

    In short, you have noooooo clue how much effort a 2 point gold (or 1 pt bronze) took.

     

     

     

    Alternative message that could be taken away: Some people put in work completely out of proportion to the points, because it's FUN.

  6. The only thing I didn't like about this when I was playing with it about six months ago was that it strongly preferred NVIDIA hardware. It wasn't anything allbenchmark was doing, rather they didn't have access to AMD GPUs to test. They said they were in contact with AMD and that problem was being worked on. Again, that was six months ago; maybe they've fixed it at this point.

     

    ...and when I say preferred, NVIDIA beat down AMD pretty well, on hardware that is comparable in every other metric. Again, not the coders intentionally wrote a different code for NVIDIA and AMD; it just worked out that way with the single code that was written.

     

    This seems to be The New Way. XTU won't run on AMD either.

×
×
  • Create New...