Bobnova
-
Posts
515 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Bobnova
-
-
I won't go into details but to remove two letters is not enough to make it look like a retail. I also think the guys participating in the MOA should be professional enough to follow the rules and not to cheat.
"Should"? certainly. "Are"? Questionable.
-
Lol, a screenshot certainly. I expect someone could manage to put an invalid one into it
Thanks for the answers!
-
I love this benchmark. Having to pay for anything but 576p is annoying though. (Annoyed at allbenchmark, not you massman. Happy with you for using this benchmark!)
-
Rb, you have a hard time getting obscure HW, don't you?
Somebody has to bench it first.
Currently there isn't much value in being the second or third or fourth person person to bench HW, categories tend to stay empty.
With points ramping up quickly that may change, suddenly it's actually worth fighting for small ranking cups.
One of the most entertaining OC battles I've had was with TATaR1N in the 6800 256mb class. Not, by any means, a well populated arena. But it was lots of fun, with rebenching going back and forth and backups and such. And I could do it, because it didn't require a $1k GPU and a $100 power board and a $50 control box and binning half a million CPUs.
Anybody feel like going back to R2? I don't.
-
I fully support this change. I'm very happy to see it happen.
-
-
Correct,
All benchmarks that submit directly to HWBOT are excluded from that rule. Includes XTU, HWBOTPrime, etc. Also exempt are CPUZ based benchmarks.
That include Heaven?
-
I guess refclock/mem freq are also exceptions to the screenshot rule.
XTU too I guess. 2x WR has no SS. #2 4x has no SS. Most of them have no SS.
-
Good luck editing ES out of SS and not noticing. There's a reason CPU-Z centers text
Doesn't seem hard to me to count pixels and get it centered with ES removed.
-
Absolutely amazing, truly.
-
Thought I was. XTU's system info page says I'm on 4.0.iforget. I'll update and report back tomorrow.
-
Consider the result in the link he gave!
That's a crapload of points for $1k. Probably a better $/point ratio than you could manage using that $1k for other hardware.
-
No benchmark options here, 3770k+biostar tz77xe4. OCing with it works though.
-
-
-
So moose, how would you "fix" it?
Lay out some enforceable rules for us that you think would solve the problem.
-
You seem to be under the impression that IMOG is sponsored. That would be incorrect.
Life is not fair, moose. It never has been and it never will be.
Here's an idea: Instead of bitching and moaning constantly, think up a better way of doing it and lay it out for us.
-
Haswell has been specified for round two since the beginning. That's how I read it, anyway.
-
I second (fourth, 12th, 200th, whatever) this suggestion!
-
Reminds me of P55 and bclk
Hell of a score, very nice!
-
If it makes you feel better the American Edition would have a lurid color scheme, a high price in "four easy payments", and require that you purchase insurance that is labeled as "Motherboard insurance" but actually only covers someone else (not you, mind) cutting themselves on the header pins.
-
it is when that one is shipped to Russia and the other 14 to the rest of us
Thankfully Intel made more than 15 4770ks.
-
i promise you retail haswell will win this comp for sure!
Yeah, because that's what MSI will give people for the final
-
Capacitor capacitance goes down with temperature, it's possible that the little 0.1µF coupling caps drop enough that the signals don't last long enough to transfer.
If they're on the board for Haswell you could try replacing them and see what happens
Futuremark Benchmarks
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
What I mean is, you still have to arrange the GPUz/CPUz windows manually, you can cover things I expect.
Unless the wrapper got a lot snazzier since I last looked anyway.