Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
  • Posts

    3656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by TaPaKaH

  1. uploaded P4-506 CPU-Z entry, attached picture of the CPU to the result

     

    then submitted other P4-506 scores (pi/wprime) and it still kept attaching the CPU picture to the score even though I didn't select to upload any additional pictures (all four slots were empty)

    example: 1,2,3,4,5

     

    then, I started uploading P4-530 scores, but it still kept attaching the picture of P4-506 even though I didn't select any additionl picture to upload (all four picture slots were empty)

    example: 1,2,3,4,5

     

    please check the picture uploading code, and, if possible, delete P4-506 cpu picture from my P4-530 scores

  2. situation1 - I've binned 100 cpus, found the best 10, kept one for myself, remaining nine were sold/gifted (as good sample) to my teammembers, they produce scores for the team on their own rig.

    what then?

     

    situation2 - I've binned 100 cpus, found the best one, benched it myself, when done, sold it to my teammember, he benches on his own rig, sells further etc...

    what then?

     

    of hardware sharing prohibition only applies for group benchsessions?

  3. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/855673_

    blind has ran 32M at 7714MHz. I had a go with that CPU once - if not for FSB wall in the 335-340 area that would've been by far the best cedarmill out there (i did 8.03ghz 1.82v with that before running into the fsb wall) ... and that FSBwall depends A LOT on the power supply. On Enermax 850 it was 330-335, on HX1000 it's around 320, on OP1000 it was ~340.

  4. At a group session, how can you tell the two apart? I disagree with your idea Sam, sorry. It would open the doors to hardware sharing and all it would take is a background switch between runs and its "all ok" :(
    in case of all other components being exactly the same the only way to prevent this from happening is to, as said, make SN software-visible (which, personally, I am against since I like to exploit RMA a lot)

     

    but in case when other components are different - why not?

    for example, if I sell/lend (you can't control the moneytransfers) a CPU to a teammember 1000km away, we both make scores on different rigs, we both submit to hwbot - it is ok.

    if I sell/lend a CPU to my teammember during a groupsession (not that they happen very often in Latvia), we both make scores on different rigs, both submit to bot - this may cause us both to get banned.

    where is the line?

     

    that's why I suggest to allow sharing as long as the benching rigs are not exact identical

×
×
  • Create New...