-
Posts
3656 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TaPaKaH
-
-
235 BCLK on Lynnfield will be tough, you'll have to use subzero for lowclock runsWith CPU & RAM on Cold, I guess with the CPU at 235x17, and DDR3-2350 with Tight timings and subs will give a nice scoreas for mems, I'm planning on 940 @ 5-6-5
-
400-450MHz on QPI gains about 3s with high CPU speeds, don't think that Clarkdale is a competitor for 4GHz category
-
I had 9:29 on a H55M-UD2H (222x18, qpi4440, mem 888@6-6-6)
-
That's an amazing achievement, you are in a class of your own, Karl
-
4000.0MHz is max, 4000.1MHz is not allowed, right?
-
prolly those submissions were made before they introduced an option for you to tell it's unlocked when submitting - so old entries defaulted to 2 cores
-
gigabyte employee allowed to participate in gigabyte comp?im looking forward to this one very much.....................gotta dust off the old single stage and warm up a bit heheheI already have the board, looking forward to as well
-
it's a CPU-Z bug that randomly occurs when running your CPU very close to the edgehow did you get your multiplier to 30x? -
what's the batch?
you forgot about the CPU_OV jumper next to the memory slots?
-
Turbo=Enabled with 1 core (no HT) gets you x23
-
it actually isn't, FSBwall 360 air and 435 LN2
-
-
just check this guy's other 920 scores and tell me what you see
-
the only prize is lucky draw?
-
sry for old result bumping, but what's the batch / pcb code ?
-
same board as for other benches - Gigabyte H55M-UD2H with highvcore/vtt BIOS from XS
-
H55 is actually not bad for 32M, I've been pulling 9:2x runs during quick 4GHz pre-testing (222x18, qpi4440, mem888@6-6-6) on air before going to LN2
-
how much did Andre ask for this score?
j/k
-
golden rule about ASUS 775 boards: if it doesn't die after first LN2 session - it newer will
-
is this a backup?
-
situation1 - I've binned 100 cpus, found the best 10, kept one for myself, remaining nine were sold/gifted (as good sample) to my teammembers, they produce scores for the team on their own rig.
what then?
situation2 - I've binned 100 cpus, found the best one, benched it myself, when done, sold it to my teammember, he benches on his own rig, sells further etc...
what then?
of hardware sharing prohibition only applies for group benchsessions?
-
-
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/855673_
blind has ran 32M at 7714MHz. I had a go with that CPU once - if not for FSB wall in the 335-340 area that would've been by far the best cedarmill out there (i did 8.03ghz 1.82v with that before running into the fsb wall) ... and that FSBwall depends A LOT on the power supply. On Enermax 850 it was 330-335, on HX1000 it's around 320, on OP1000 it was ~340.
-
in case of all other components being exactly the same the only way to prevent this from happening is to, as said, make SN software-visible (which, personally, I am against since I like to exploit RMA a lot)At a group session, how can you tell the two apart? I disagree with your idea Sam, sorry. It would open the doors to hardware sharing and all it would take is a background switch between runs and its "all ok"but in case when other components are different - why not?
for example, if I sell/lend (you can't control the moneytransfers) a CPU to a teammember 1000km away, we both make scores on different rigs, we both submit to hwbot - it is ok.
if I sell/lend a CPU to my teammember during a groupsession (not that they happen very often in Latvia), we both make scores on different rigs, both submit to bot - this may cause us both to get banned.
where is the line?
that's why I suggest to allow sharing as long as the benching rigs are not exact identical
Bugreport - image upload is crazy
in Support
Posted
uploaded P4-506 CPU-Z entry, attached picture of the CPU to the result
then submitted other P4-506 scores (pi/wprime) and it still kept attaching the CPU picture to the score even though I didn't select to upload any additional pictures (all four slots were empty)
example: 1,2,3,4,5
then, I started uploading P4-530 scores, but it still kept attaching the picture of P4-506 even though I didn't select any additionl picture to upload (all four picture slots were empty)
example: 1,2,3,4,5
please check the picture uploading code, and, if possible, delete P4-506 cpu picture from my P4-530 scores