-
Posts
3655 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TaPaKaH
-
-
very strong Q6600 you have, congrats!
-
which memory ICs for 1173MHz ?
-
http://hwbot.org/community/user/tapakah
just got the "5000 boint team contribution" achievement when I'm nowhere near 5K
...fix is needed
-
not REALLY an advantage, only B0 were unlocked, and B0 itself (as a core) can't do much over 4.8-5GHz, which is not hard with a good G0
-
QMAQ ES had unlocked multi
-
67000-67500 isn't hard on AMD with high enough mem and uncore, but sub 65K?
OBR, just a question - were your runs at lower clocks with same efficency?
-
...already updated my excels for rev4
-
Unfair because not everyone have equal chances of qualifying, only guys from countries with big enough sales (so that local gigabyte office, if it exists, can have profit in making the qualifiers)Eg: the competitions playing a role in the point thing was not for manufacturers but a logical change (why would it not be fair to be rewarded to be in a worldwide final?). -
Again, don't understand your logic.The majority is? So all the threads about corporate overclockers are like ... 'for real' and 'just to have a bit of fun'?If you want to solve that issue AND keep the manufacturers happy - create the UFL. Why does it have to come bundled with lots of other features that are not really necessary ?
-
Fair enough, let manufacturers have their UFL corner and leave everyone else alone with all the other "brand new features".The overclocking world has become very complex and manufacturer overclocking will be part of it from now on. We can either sit in the corner and cry all night long, or can think of ways to embrace manufacturers and their wish to use overclocking as marketing. Ignoring MFCs would actually be the least intelligent thing to do, even from an overclocker for overclocker point of view. This revision is actually all about giving manufacturers a separate playground so that the normal people can return to a quiet playground againI don't understand your logic - you complain about the complexity and cost of adding features, yet you want to introduce the whole new user/team scoring algorythm when majority is happy with the existing one
EDIT:
this plus all above - do you want to say that sponsors are the real reason why you're going to the rev4?Since we're getting good feedback on the plan -
here's the original XS thread
-
wp32 at almost 7900, if not for fsbwall - this is the WR cpu for sure
-
and a picture to prove it's not an "ES"
-
noone was running "other benchmarks" in mass order 2 years ago
I don't know if he is the owner of the score, but the score itself is valid - E21x0 chips that can do ~500 fsb on air and ~550 on ln2 DO exist
-
OMEGA3-san, can you tell the batch/PCB code of the CPU?
-
is it a 37xxA Costa Rica?
I had a couple of those, couldn't even do 3.8 on air
-
on some cards and win7 you can't indeed make a screenshot for AM3 using built-in stuff
IIRC, the solution was to download mspaint separately, install it on win7 and use it for making screenshots
-
no thanks, I'd rather buy a flat
-
so you don't deny it?
-
ah, you have already completed your daily norm of gigabyte asslicking in the ASUS thread, all is clear
-
but I thought you love marketing ...
-
you may have missed "Gigabyte" as brand in the GPUzI have cut out the "world record" part. No need to go this far ... -
Congratulations NickShih, truly the greatest and the most skilled 32M guy as of today! Well deserved win!
-
As I already told on OCX, there is a valid reason why this cannot be done now (specifically, not having any Lynnfield at the moment).
If this is a case of double standard, fair enough, use the "gigabyte employee rule" to remove my (not my own, obviously) super-cheat-photoshopped scores, it's not like I lose anything in a "fun" contest.
giorgioprimo - Core i7 980X @ 6121MHz - 5min 59sec 687ms SuperPi 32m
in Result Discussions
Posted
990X ES look a bit different, this is a Q4EG