
gtxx58
Members-
Posts
134 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by gtxx58
-
UPDATE ! Im not passing to much time on the platform but binning for th moment is impossible to do (890fxa-ud7) its seem to be limited at around 385-390fsb whatever cpu i put in it, overdrive or not, single stick or 2. FSB seem to scale with VID northbridge but not that much, i know that board do much higher, i think ale belo or cnzdrn push it between 415 and 430. maybe someone has a idea ? Ganged help but not at this point!
-
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
Maybe other memory bench is more accuracy! -
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
I agree with you, on amd side it seem not predictable, the score done with striker, I think it legit, Nvidia chipset is Faster than p45, x48 on memory -
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
For me it’s pretty consistent from 11600 to 13000, if I considered it as a bug, I’m not submitted it, maybe it’s score higher but I don’t think by 1000. If I compare my results with you terraraptor, on the same setting I do about the same. -
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
This is just a cpuz bug, trp is at 5 -
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
This is simple, beat it with v3.0 :) -
gtxx58 - DDR2 SDRAM - 13022 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth
gtxx58 replied to M1RROR's topic in Result Discussions
I redo it if you want ! -
ground1556 - Xeon W3520 @ 5603MHz - 15sec 190ms PiFast
gtxx58 replied to Jokot's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks for the tips ground ! -
ground1556 - Xeon W3520 @ 5603MHz - 15sec 190ms PiFast
gtxx58 replied to Jokot's topic in Result Discussions
Not expected less from you, great stuff, you do something special to run full at full pot ? -
gtxx58 - Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 6175MHz - 7sec 547ms SuperPi - 1M
gtxx58 replied to unityofsaints's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks, Great idea! Next time i push more, having problem with cb at 105, resolved at the end of the session but board was soak. -
gtxx58 - Core 2 Quad Q8200 @ 3838MHz - 11min 53sec 265ms SuperPi - 32M
gtxx58 replied to Jokot's topic in Result Discussions
Its just a story of strap limitation and chipset, all my chip do it! -
Thanks for sharing this info, so if it about 420 bclk wall i think its more a core wall or board it self between chipsets, im sharing some info of my expérience in next 2-3 week
-
Any good information how to bin a Sempron 45nm properly, limited on fsb side or htt or core, any info would be helpful. Thanks edit : any cbb or cb, memory limitation or strap and difference between chipset.
-
Country CUP - 10th Anniversary design thread:
gtxx58 replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Native 7x multiplier ? -
And congrats for the winners
-
This will be a great comp, i hope to be here the following year !
-
gtxx58 - Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 5958MHz - 3.65 points Cinebench - R11.5
gtxx58 replied to gtxx58's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks Captain ! Keep your insane works -
gtxx58 - Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 5958MHz - 3.65 points Cinebench - R11.5
gtxx58 replied to gtxx58's topic in Result Discussions
thanks guys, at that point i think the pot is simply not able to accept more voltage, resulted in increase in temps, need more cold to scale !