Stelaras

I'm still waiting for an answer ....

Ooops ! Sorry man ... you're right (That 1gb was tricky) But still my score isn't at all impossible .

Anyone ??? Also , the two top scores with celeron 1.7ghz .. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689544 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1359 They have 170k efficiency and 1st one didn't do maxmem (don't know for other tweaks) ... Also ... with celeron 2.0ghz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=753084 ... 169K http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=807658 ... 161K And there are other good scores with 161K efficiency with other celeron s478 runs . My spi is not impossible as demiurg wrote .

I just got a notification that this score blocked : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818335 I know its a good run , but i can do it again and again . It's fully tweaked wilth almost all tweaks i know . If you calclulate the PP , you'll see that i have : 160K This score ( http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771065 ) has 178K and he's not tweaked at all and at lower fsb & lower dram frequency ... All the other scores in this category is slow i could say.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=813217 SF3D , why is it blocked ? The orb link works fine . ??? http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9696244

OK then . Thanks !!

So , as long it's not software ramdrive , will you approve a score that was made even with 8 SSD Raid0 ???

Are you saying that you're gonna make a new rule with a "cap" or "limit" in xp startup let's say ??? What value do you think is appropriate ? Something like 3 i-ram raid0 ? 4 i-ram ??? 2 ssd raid 0??? Give us a value cause i want to run pcmark in the next few days :D:D:D

I have the same problem .

All results have been deleted except TaPaKaH's (Last two in this list) . Why ??? Date submitted is 1-1-08 .

That's nice to hear . Thank you .

Do we have to upload all files , or only the html file ?? I'm having problem cause i can't upload in my forum attachment bigger than 200kb

All of the results are fixed , except this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587794

wprime1024 wrong cpu again ... wPrime 1024m - 6min 16sec 330ms - beast-usa (TRP) - (Intel Core 2 E6700 ... @ 3600mhz ) 13.6 points - [ link ] - [ compare ] wPrime 1024m - 6min 24sec 50ms - vhco (Extreme Prometeia) - (Intel Core 2 E6700 ... @ 3570mhz ) 1.8 points - [ link ] - [ compare ] wPrime 1024m - 6min 27sec 370ms - beast-usa (TRP) - (Intel Core 2 E6700 ... @ 3520mhz ) [ link ] - [ compare ] wPrime 1024m - 6min 29sec 30ms - beast-usa (TRP) - (Intel Core 2 E6700 ... @ 3465mhz ) [ link ] - [ compare ] wPrime 1024m - 6min 44sec 900ms - beast-usa (TRP) - (Intel Core 2 E6700 ... @ 3517mhz ) All are with quad core cpu and not with e6700 .

It happened before and it will happen again if they don't find the bug . http://www.hwbot.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=615

Again same problem with quad core cpu ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585789 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585788 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585787 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585718 http://www.wprime.net/cgi-bin/score.exe?id=3560

If a score can't be found in wprime.net result browser (http://www.wprime.net/scoresearch.cgi) , how can you check it ??? There are scores in hwbot listings with valid checksum that dont exist in the result browser. How is this possible ???

How do you check the checksum ??? Is there a page where i can test it ?

And something else ... How is it possible that some scores appear valid when they don't exist in the wprime.net database ????????? We know that there are two ways to submit a score . From forum (verification link from post) , and from checksum (verification from wprime.net)

Also ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578574 This for sure has wrong cpu speed . It's just impossible to make 10 mins with 4Ghz C2D ... Same member also has this : http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=568147 ... with 4.5Ghz So , real speed has to be around 4.5-4.6Ghz

Also ... in wprime32M http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585191 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584380 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585300 These three results are also with QX6700 (Quad Core processor) ... and not with E6700. Which moderator has verified as correct all these results ????????????????? "Info: this has been verified as correct by a moderator." Thank you.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583944 These two results are with QX6700 Quad Core and not with E6700 ! First score is here : http://www.wprime.net/cgi-bin/score.exe?id=3423 ... where you can read "Intel® Core2 Quad CPU @ 2.66GHz Core: Unknown " In second score you can read "Description: Standard QX6700 " Thanks .

What is the proper way to run in linux OS ???

OK . The result was blocked by a team moderator of my team . We contacted the member and we will see what we're gonna do.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575518 What's wrong with this one ? Why is it blocked ???????