
Stelaras
Members-
Posts
396 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Stelaras
-
Hondacity - Core i7 920 @ 5387.4MHz - 14.91 sec PiFast
Stelaras replied to Blackbolt's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks . My REX3 is dead , but now i have one X58-OC available . I'll try it soon . -
Hondacity - Core i7 920 @ 5387.4MHz - 14.91 sec PiFast
Stelaras replied to Blackbolt's topic in Result Discussions
Nice . Is this with the Gigabyte OC board ???? -
Nanok - Core i7 2600K @ 5497MHz - 6min 6sec 422ms SuperPi 32m
Stelaras replied to Mean Machine's topic in Result Discussions
Very nice score ! I also lost one good 2600K on an MSI GD80 while trying wprime 2 weeks ago. That CPU was a 57X one and it was playing for some months on a maximus IV with no issues. It died 2 seconds after pressing the "run" button on the MSI . After this , i have to say that i will avoid like the devil to put a CPU again on an MSI board . -
I haven't tried with 68X0 . Only 5870 & 6970 . Did you try with other drivers also ? Can you please write the scores you have with and without the tweaks ? I want to see the scaling .
-
Hazzan - GeForce GTX 580 - 12198 marks 3DMark11 - Performance
Stelaras replied to Hiwa's topic in Result Discussions
Amazing!!!! -
Glad i could help .
-
As i'm pretty sure many people want to know , here is the tranparent tweak i found a week ago ... This one gives a pretty nice boost to 12K + . You just have to move the mouse while running transparent test. Try to find the optimal speed . You don't have to move it all through the run . Sometimes moving it for a few secs is what needed . I found ikt accidentaly while browsing with my 2nd PC . I share the same mousepad and i accidentaly moved the bench rig mouse while browsing with the 2nd .
-
You don't have to use rivatuner . Just check at the installed folder > Program files > Rivatuner > Tools > d3doverrider . Run the d3doverrider and select the following options : High , On , Off. For the LOD , you have to use setlod application . Its here :http://ftpbackup.mojostech.net/download/Benchmark%20Tweaks/SetLODb6/SetLODb6.zip With high clocks , 5000 is percfectly legit .
-
Stelaras - GeForce GTX 580 @ 1060/1240MHz - 132670 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Stelaras replied to Vivi's topic in Result Discussions
Hey Goddy , Thanks ! I also one managed a 133K run with vga watercooled , but i would like to try it under subzero . -
Smoke - GeForce GTX 580 @ 1400/1300MHz - 137130 marks 3DMark2001 SE
Stelaras replied to Kurbel's topic in Result Discussions
Nice score !! It seems 580 is the best card right now for 01 I think this is the tweak people is looking for ... OK ... Here is what i found myself . Open nvidia inspector and go to the elevated settings . The press the third button from the right "show unknown settings from nvidia predefined profiles" Then you will see some more options available . Search lower at the "unknown settings" There is an option "pre_d3d9_compatibility_bits" . Just pull the arrow and select the 0x00000040 option . Now get to play with this favorite game . -
pro - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 43116 marks PCMark 2005
Stelaras replied to topdog's topic in Result Discussions
Nice !!! I remember last year when we made the 38K run , we were trying to find a controller to test. After some research , i noticed that a controller seems to lack at 4K tests . I have stored in one of my HDD a crystaldiskmark with the 2 acards on ICHxR . That was the reason we could make high virus scan scores . With a raid contoller you get a nice boost and general usage though . I'll try to locate it and upload it just for reference . You still didn't answer me about this ...I can't find what i'm missing because i have never commented in the past ... -
Tried d3doverrider ??? Lod what value ? Try around 15.00 .
-
Just an update ... It's been a few days since i logged in here and i'm trying to catch up . I found the "tweak" by myself . It's nothing special . Clean and totally legit . It gives a transparent score around 13000 at win7 . Don't know about vista , but i suspect around 30000 possible.
-
pro - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 43116 marks PCMark 2005
Stelaras replied to topdog's topic in Result Discussions
Then i have to apology because it seems the way i wrote it was not good . I explained before what the issue was but you took it the wrong way. Subzero score seems on par with the majority of scores . Maybe the web page rendering is a bit high , but i can't say until i test it myself and see some runs from other people . When you see the 99% of scores and the subtest at the same clocks are very close , it's for sure not normal to see a few scores with high subtest results. I don't have any reason not to believe that the transparent tweak is normal if hwbot staff say it's OK . What i believe it must be done is set some kind of borders/limits to the subtests . The truth is that few people know how to properly tweak pcmark and you are one of them for sure . We should all bench at same settings as with every other benchmarks . What i would like to see from the hwbot staff is to give some rules on what is allowed or not . For example , can we change the video encoding resolution or not ? Can we adjust the video encoding filters or not ? The codec ?? Can we adjust the visual settings or not ? etc etc ... I'll tell you again . I'm not telling that you cheated . And please explain this : "you can't just keep calling me out every time i do something you don't understand and expect me to hand it over with a smile on my face.. " When did i write a bad comment in the past regarding a score of yours ??? Please give a link . Feel free to check the Greek forums and see it yourself . I have read some ways to do this with WMV powertoy and registry settings . But, is it acceptable by hwbot and futuremark ?? -
pro - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 43116 marks PCMark 2005
Stelaras replied to topdog's topic in Result Discussions
James , i think you misunderstood my comment . Did i say you have cheated ???? I'm sure you can make this score again . No need for video taping . What makes me wonder is that there are 5 people who can make so high transparent and video encoding scores . It seems they know some tweaks and can do it . My comment was just because : Your video is around 300-400 higher than the normal scores . Transparent is around 3000 higher than the usual scores . -
What i can tell about the latest video encoding boost that people saw a few months ago is that all it does is to use all the CPU cores . How to do this ? Simply install the latest Pcmark05 1.2.2 build from futuremark (it appears as 1.2 but it's 1.2.2. in reality) ... and after that install a newer Futuremark Systeminfo (V3.6 or V4) . After that your video encoding speed will go up from 2XXX to 3600 . About the transparent i haven't found any way to give it a boost. I'm stuck at 8000-9000 at 5700Mhz 2600K . I have played with registry settings .... Blur , Alpha blend , Aero tweaks etc . I just have a feeling that it's something with the 3d acceleration . 3D pixel shader needs LOD , gpu clocks ... and direct3doverrider with triple buffer enabled and vsync disabled . That virus scan you found is way too high for sure . Web page rendering needs to close all the IE addons and play with some advanced settings . If i remember something else , i'll post it . Agree 100% .
-
No , it still scales with cpu even with aero . The gain with higher gpu clocks is very little . I have tested it many times . Vista and 2008 server is faster .
-
I was looking the pcmark scores and found some results that have high transparent windows at win7 . Transparent scales with cpu clocks . It's like a cpu benchmark . For example ... 1st) http://hwbot.org/submission/2160869_omega3_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2600k_35882_marks 11000 transparent , win7 , 2600k @ 5300 . 2nd) http://hwbot.org/submission/2178436_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2600k_35748_marks 10800 transparent , win7x64 , 2600k @ 5500 . 3rd) http://hwbot.org/submission/2160841_gyrock_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2600k_34673_marks 10800 transparent , win7x64 , 2600k @ 5300 . 4th) http://hwbot.org/submission/2165869_yancyan_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2600k_33136_marks 10800 transparent , win7 , 2600k @ 5500 . 5th) http://hwbot.org/submission/2142160_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_core_i5_2500k_34344_marks 12800 transparent , win7 , 2500k @ 5400 . 6th) http://hwbot.org/submission/2142470_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_core_i5_2500_27719_marks 9600 transparent , win7 , 2500 @ 4070 . Normal scores for these clocks would and win7 would be around 7000-8500 , from my experience . You can find many pcmark results with similar transparent score . I have never seen any higher score than 8800 even at 5700 Mhz 2600K at win7 . Also , regarding vista . It seems that you can get a score around 16000 to 19000 . How is possible to get 31000 ??? http://hwbot.org/submission/2128177_steponz_pcmark_2005_core_i7_2600k_37340_marks/ This is with 980x ... http://hwbot.org/submission/1040000_vento1_pcmark_2005_core_i7_extreme_980x_32970_marks 35000 marks with 5200 Mhz 980x Also very high with 6core ... http://hwbot.org/submission/2139248_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_xeon_x5667_6_cores_31247_marks 10800 at 4850 mhz ... I'm not saying that all these users above are cheaters ! The high transparent score is just something that is bothering me and my teammates a long time now . We have tried various tweaks etc with no real gain .
-
pro - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 43116 marks PCMark 2005
Stelaras replied to topdog's topic in Result Discussions
Congrats James , but i feel that there is something wrong with your transparent score and with the video encoding. -
subzero - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 40925 marks PCMark 2005
Stelaras replied to George_o/c's topic in Result Discussions
Nice !!!! Now stop playing around with your PC and start taking care of your patients . -
Aristidis - Core i7 2600 @ 5634MHz - 4sec 344ms wPrime 32m
Stelaras replied to Over_Cracker's topic in Result Discussions
Fixed it . -
Stelaras - Core i7 2600K @ 5704.7MHz - 5min 48sec 703ms SuperPi 32m
Stelaras replied to a topic in Result Discussions
Thank you boys ! I'm still learning this platform . It's a bit tricky with the RAM's . Hypers don't play as well as with X58 . Also , i couldn't use the mem tweakit function I don't know what's wrong but when i hit apply the system crashes (BSOD & restart) . This happens with every OS i tried . -
kintaro - Xeon X5687 @ 6329MHz - 3sec 734ms wPrime 32m
Stelaras replied to Vivi's topic in Result Discussions
Nice !!!