Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Christian Ney

Members
  • Posts

    7940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Christian Ney

  1. Sigh, useless to send me your valids to get them validated. CPU-Z guys were very clear to me in the email: No more exceptions, sorry. We cannot afford it anymore now. If you want to validate offline (using F7) you will need to validate the files online asap. When a new version of CPU-Z comes out the previous versions support are dropped one week after. Past this week it's too late. Sorry again for the people who sent me their valid files, didn't manage to change his will.
  2. The most obvious one can see at first sight is the cache info that are wrong for exemple.
  3. Look closer lol There are some pretty obvious stuff.
  4. Please email them to me at christian [at] HWBOT.org with the name you want to be displayed and the email address you want them attached to if any. I will try to get them validated.
  5. CPU-Z 1.64 "should" work fine with Haswell but CPU-Z guys didn't manage to deep test it as they still haven't received Haswell+board from Intel. 1.62 is bugged for sure. 1.63 not sure yet.
  6. The problem is GPUZ was reporting Intel HD Graphics for all of them for a long time. Only newer version report HD 2000, HD 3000 and so on.
  7. I have to ask more info, I know that 1.62 is bugged on haswell, not sure about 1.63.
  8. This move doesnt reject them. You just cant validate using an older version than 1.64 from now on.
  9. Maybe I have an idea to make it even more easier for both members and moderators: Device ID SB: HWBOT DB Name <= GPU Description HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0152) <= GT1 (Sandy Bridge) HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0156) <= GT1 (Sandy Bridge Mobile) (some desktop cpus make use of the mobile version Pentium B9xx) HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0112) <= GT2 HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0116) <= GT2 Mobile HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0122) <= GT2+ HD Graphics (Dev. ID 0126) <= GT2+ Mobile HD Graphics P3000 => HD Graphics P3000 IB: HWBOT DB Name <= Additional Info HD Graphics 2500 (Dev. ID 0152) <= 2500 (GT1) HD Graphics 4000 (Dev. ID 0162) <= 4000 (GT2) HD Graphics 4000 (Dev. ID 0166) <= 4000 (GT2) Mobile HD Graphics P4000 <= P4000 (I think Dev. ID 016A) Dunno what those two are for: 015A 0156 (should be some kind of 2500 Mobile (GT1)) Haswell: (Well Shit) Intel Haswell Desktop (GT1): 0x0402 Intel Haswell Desktop (GT2): 0x0412 Intel Haswell Desktop (GT2+): 0x0422 Intel Haswell Mobile (GT1): 0x0406 Intel Haswell Mobile (GT2): 0x0416 Intel Haswell Mobile (GT2+): 0x0426 Intel Haswell Server (GT1): 0x040A Intel Haswell Server (GT2): 0x041A Intel Haswell Server (GT2+): 0x042A Intel Haswell SDV Desktop (GT1): 0x0C02 Intel Haswell SDV Desktop (GT2): 0x0C12 Intel Haswell SDV Desktop (GT2+): 0x0C22 Intel Haswell SDV Mobile (GT1): 0x0C06 Intel Haswell SDV Mobile (GT2): 0x0C16 Intel Haswell SDV Mobile (GT2+): 0x0C26 Intel Haswell SDV Server (GT1): 0x0C0A Intel Haswell SDV Server (GT2): 0x0C1A Intel Haswell SDV Server (GT2+): 0x0C2A Intel Haswell ULT Desktop (GT1): 0x0A02 Intel Haswell ULT Desktop (GT2): 0x0A12 Intel Haswell ULT Desktop (GT2+): 0x0A22 Intel Haswell ULT Mobile (GT1): 0x0A06 Intel Haswell ULT Mobile (GT2): 0x0A16 Intel Haswell ULT Mobile (GT2+): 0x0A26 Intel Haswell ULT Server (GT1): 0x0A0A Intel Haswell ULT Server (GT2): 0x0A1A Intel Haswell ULT Server (GT2+): 0x0A2A Intel Haswell CRW Desktop (GT1): 0x0D12 Intel Haswell CRW Desktop (GT2): 0x0D22 Intel Haswell CRW Desktop (GT2+): 0x0D32 Intel Haswell CRW Mobile (GT1): 0x0D16 Intel Haswell CRW Mobile (GT2): 0x0D26 Intel Haswell CRW Mobile (GT2+): 0x0D36 Intel Haswell CRW Server (GT1): 0x0D1A Intel Haswell CRW Server (GT2): 0x0D2A Intel Haswell CRW Server (GT2+): 0x0D3A Yaye, 3'308 results to moderate, it will be fun
  10. Yeah I won't ask TPU to fix it in fact, better leave them named Arrandale and Clarkdale to avoid confusion. In this case it's even better to leave it as it is as we have: Mobile HD Graphics (Arrandale) and HD Graphics (Clarkdale) now on both HWBOT and GPU-Z. People can't do it wrong now, they have no excuse.
  11. Hum, I will ask if such a thing is possible without the need of extra coding time. But I think it will mess up things like this, because people will report scores like: hey this is GT1 ranking and not GT2 and I don't want mods explaining over and over how/what/why. Sorry I don't really get your list, what should be "in the same ranking" as what I will make those changes right away then. As per the codename, maybe Wiki is wrong ? I will ask TPU, he knows better.
  12. Right, you point is valid, it's a different socket though the interface is the same (PCIe). Soooo: SB: GMA HD GT1 (Sandy Bridge) GMA HD GT1 (Sandy Bridge) Mobile GMA HD 2000 GT2 GMA HD 2000 GT2 Mobile GMA HD 3000 GT2+ GMA HD 3000 GT2+ Mobile GMA HD P3000 IB: GMA HD (Ivy Bridge) (not sure if there is a mobile version of this one, I have seen it only on Desktop pentium and Celeron so far) GMA HD 2500 GMA HD 4000 GMA HD 4000 Mobile GMA HD P4000 Haswell: Not enough info yet Those two are fine ? http://HWBOT.org/hardware/videocard/gma_hd/ or we should split/rename something ? http://HWBOT.org/hardware/videocard/gma_hd_mobile/ Like: GMA HD (Clarkdale) GMA HD Mobile (Arrandale)
  13. Not for the other ones I found, anyway the manufacturer know how to know who submited
  14. Yes turned out they were from there (guy who sent me the first ss didn't tell me he didn't find them by himself in the first place, we thought he was the finder). Then I refound the same valids and new ones by myself (coming soon, now ID+name is blurred).
  15. 2 Days ago 1.62 Support was dropped (aka you can't validate anymore). 1.63 support should be dropped today if not done already. Please make sure to use 1.64 when benching!
  16. nVidia managed to reproduce the problem in-house. It is not a feature it is a bug. They are in process of figuring out the issue and fix it soon. I will keep you updated in this thread.
  17. Because that's what the card is, other people have 128bit too if you check the rankings If I am not wrong, the DDR version has 64 bit and the SDRAM version has 128-bit.
  18. You can set them but they don't work Your valid shows nothing
  19. Yes there is a way if you submited using your email then it is listed under your account. You just have to login and then hide the sub (located on the right of the sub).
×
×
  • Create New...