Christian Ney

that's very odd, => RMA

because microsoft use the same api as cpuz in windows 8 therefore they get in conflic that's why cpuz 1.59 and lower were completely bugged in windows 8. Franck D. had to move to another api that seems shit, not very precise and he need to calibrate it. for AMD he did the calibration on Llano that's why Llano is not affected by bug but Llano calibration doesn't work on AM3. This explain the such difference between cpuz 1.6x and cpuz 1.59 and before. Btw all other clocks reading software will have to move to another api as well because microsoft used it and doesn't want to share related stuff. So blame Microsoft

why submite it 3 times ? You know you can edite and delete

Okay Franck D. (CPU-Z) did testing the whole day on my system via remote controll from his place. Bugs are fixed (at least the know ones) and seems the precision is close to cpuz 1.59 but not as good (impossible to be as good or better). Why ? Blame microsoft (long story) So I asked him to release it asap and not name it cpuz 1.61. Will double check everything tomorrow but i tested his last version and seems working fine. If you encounter any clocks reading problems or any cpuz related problems with current version, please report here so we can work on.

let's make a Ryba fanpage on facebook

btw it works on FM's website (links to scores I mean): http://www.3dmark.com/competitions/asrock-z77/ btw competition is still running accordint to the countdown ASRock ...

Remove %20 in the url and change 11 into v: Noobs From this: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/%204180777 To this: http://3dmark.com/3dmv/4180777

I have online storage backups, nas backups, 2x 500Go external HDD backups and backups from my USB drivers. Plus the ones I have in my daily use laptop and workstation

only 3 weeks and after that I will have even more work and my hardware is still not at the same location I am fail

somebody is in charge of submiting my results 5 mins before end of competition

gonna see who trolls who

it is not a backup posted now, he just commented a score I submited more than 1 year ago

You are back to enthusiast league

Yes this is a one year old result

UD3H seems better for cpu clocking and UD5H for memory clocking

Some reading for you: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Overclocking Experience: Tips and Tricks There is a lot of blabla at the beginning, go to half page for the interesting stuff

DDR566

CPU-Z 1.60.x is/was also bugged btw. Last version to work perfect is CPUZ 1.59 but you can't validate with it anymore. But feel free to use this one for screenshots. Know bugged Sockets at the moment for 1.60.x and 1.61.x: LGA775 AM2/2+/3/3+

fyi, to verify your clocks you can use CPUZ 1.59 which works just perfect. 1.60.x, 1.61.x are all bugged. Ho FYI, you can't validate anymore online with CPUZ 1.60.x

-.-'

Too bad it stats the day I go on vacation and I promised my girlfriend: Okay you won, no hardware on the beach ... Have fun guys

Tested the 1.61.3, not getting better, the effect is now reversed and there are other side effects. Tomorrow Franck D. (guy from CPUID/Z) will remote control my Bulldozer system and do some testing on it, hope we can fix this issue this week-end.

Went to office quickly this morning to test the 1.61.2, it's even worse than others, it shows 5 MHz or 9.6 MHz bus frequency Sent 16 cpuz report.txt files to CPUID