Christian Ney

I see where this is going

Let's continue:

fuck, need to score first

So they never received it at their depot, but they managed to sent it back to me from their depot. Getting better

tweak level = 0 Storage Caching

Checked

So Windows 7 x64, Toshiba installation - so no comment. 3DMarks nor SystemInfo ever been installed. -Intall 3DMark03 v3.6 - 1901. -Installation completed -Go to control panel => uninstall program => sort by date latest installed on => just under 3DMark03 should be SystemInfo => Uninstall it (should be ver3.2 or something) -When it is uninstalled, run 3DMark03, it should tell you: ''Errors occured while initializing Futuremark SystemInfo. [...] please see futuremark.com'' -So this means it worked, now download SystemInfo 4.9 => Install it. -When the installation is completed, run 3DMark03, shouldn't be any problems. -Run the benchmark => wait till the end -Submite your score... and TADAAHHHH: http://3dmark.com/3dm03/6472119 So Conclusion: Kenny you sux

will try now on my ultrabook to see, Which OS do you use ?

But you don't mess with the Zohan

ok I see, so I guess 4.9 replaced the previous one, when you start 3DM03 and clic scan system or whatever is it called, which SI is present for the scan ? (should be written somewhere in the report)

so latest 3DM03 + SI 4.9 still issues ? tried to manually uninstall SI from 3DM03 and install 4.9 after ?

too tweaked bro

This one has never been OCed, always been running on a deskop stock pc. Never managed to kill a cpu under OC even if I want to, but cpu I don't touch dies for nothing ...

Pretty well actually: RETARDS!

I sent the following CPU to RMA at Intel because it died: Intel i7 920 SLBCH 3839A624-0570 via DHL like they asked (like usual) to: Intel CWP DHL Supply Chain Zwenkgras 23 5986 Beringe NL Yesterday I received a package from DHL (not the same package I sent) There was a neopren protection + a CPU box (blister) and a CPU inside. Guess what it is the one I sent: Intel i7 920 SLBCH 3839A624-0570 So I write an email to Intel asking why the hell they sent me back the exact same CPU ? Intel : Thank you for your email. Please be aware that we have never received your CPU. Me : So can you explain me how come the sender of the package is:? DSC Beringe - Intel Mr. xxxxx xxxxxx Zwenkgras 23 5986 PM Beringe NL Netherlands, The Intel : Our data indicate that we have not yet received the product subject to an order of parts under warranty. ...

Me no have Trinity, me no can say if the 2x bus bug is present with cpuz+Trinity or me no can say if it is multiplier bug like with Llano CPU which multiplier can be set higher but they doesn't work so real freq is stock multi x bus speed. me just woke up, me talk like that...

Or add an option on hwbot like there is for CPU for unlockable graphics card. So the results will not go under GTX 465 nor GTX 470 but GTX 465 Unlocked. Just like a Phenom X4 you unlock into Phenom X5/X6

Thanks

Checked

I didn't mean photoshop, I mean afaik while BIOS editing you can change vendors ID, PCI ID (card ID) doing so also the name GPU-Z will read.

Sweet, board built for warriors, I want one

Here is a gpuz screenshot of the GT 640 128bit DDR3 edition: It is this one: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt640/specifications Looks like there are 3 different versions: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-640-oem/specifications Thanks Karl

Yeah I know but how to do ? You can even flash it to 470 and keep the 465 ID so... And I guess you can flash a 470 too and make it looks like 465 in the screenshot. Isn't it written 465 somewhere in your card on the PCB, a sticker or so ?

no

Attach a picture to the submission that it is indeed a GTX 465. That's all we can do. And also comment that you flashed it to 470