Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Gigelz

Members
  • Posts

    690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Gigelz

  1. 2 hours ago, fat4l said:

    Oh my god. Them prices are really good! I own 2666 CL10 corsair dom plats 4x4GB, but wanted to play with these 2400CL9 mems :( 2600c10 is no good to me. What a shame.

    sad to hear that :( atm i have no 2400c9 kit left. but i have a few sticks of corsair GTX9 prototypes with dominator gtx hs left. would that be something for you ?

    but fyi the 2400c9 trident and 2600c10 trident are technically the same sticks :) same chips, pcb and so on.

    • Confused 1
  2. On 12/9/2018 at 5:49 PM, Don_Dan said:

    Well done, Nico and Kai! :)

    thanks my friend :)

    18 hours ago, d0minat0r said:

    Good job!

    thanks :)

    14 hours ago, Noxinite said:

    Great score!

    There were no +700MHz results for ages and now 3 in a few weeks. XD

    i think because it is not so attractive for people. you can´t earn lots of points :( but this is like a personal milestone for me :) also this was achieved with the first 652@air cpu that we tested under ln2. imo the board is not on it´s limit.

  3. On 12/2/2018 at 3:58 PM, suzuki said:

    I planned a session sub-zero with some friends for 7-8-9. Not to be any problems there,for 7-8 we should use the first background and for 9 it will be supplied when exactly ?

    sorry,we planned this for couple of weeks now,didn’t know the date will be moved.

     

    21 minutes ago, Luebke said:

    same here. we´ll do a LN2-benchsession that weekend. what if we bench on 8th in the night and uploading the result lasts till the 9th?

    what´s about a period of transition?

    or you give us the new background a few days before so we can bench and upload later... in that case it would be save to us.

    Same here. The original date for new background was 1.12. Right ?

  4. 2 hours ago, dreamcat4 said:

    Well I wasnt even trying to do that in the first place. My message was not intended for any such overclockers. It was intended for all the regular folk who own these publicly available OC Formula overclocking motherboards, who come here and keep asking about which pads to short / isolate. Why isolate them? And you know, 'why bother' or 'oh it's too hard and difficult to do that bit' etc. Well the only reason I bothered to comment about it in the first place was because you can't replace an LGA socket very easily..

    And we are also talking about how hard to get hold of the MOCF specifically, these days. It's a pretty rare board now.

    agree. why you should burn the pins, because you are too lazy to cover them ? i want to keep my board in 100% condition. not 99% with burned pins if it is not necessary. and i am one of the xoc guys ;)

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  5. On 11/13/2018 at 10:21 PM, Don_Dan said:

    I thought @Leeghoofd had asked richba5tard to add 1151 v2, but in the database there's only LGA1151 right now, which is including all Core i7 6xxx, 7xxx, 8xxxx and 9xxxx.

     

    On 11/14/2018 at 2:01 PM, Leeghoofd said:

    Yep I did, will task again ....

    does that mean we have to bench 6700k+7700k on z170/270 and 8700k/9900k on z370/390 for stage 1+2 ?

    • Confused 2
  6. 15 minutes ago, ZFeSS said:

    What kind of problems you have with? I have an opposite experience - Hypers are hard for 775, but your Cellshocks are working fine.

    agreed. it is hard to post at default bios settings with hyper on my p5e3 premium. i think the board does not like the spd from my corsair 2000c7.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...