Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

nedernakker

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nedernakker

  1. thanks mates, card needs hardmods for gold, need to figure it out
  2. that is a very nice cpu, lucky retail?
  3. I agree with that, but it's fun to see a locked multi cpu benefit from the baseclock straps
  4. have 2 sticks coming in tomorrow, chance is there I might try these with dominance mounted still for max frequency don't think my 3930K is the best solution...
  5. stock cooling? guess the SS is on it? nice freq.. reference model?
  6. I run 2 sets of gskill ripjaws 2133 c7 @ 2400 9-11-9-27 and that requires 1.2v for stability. When i use my corsair 16 GB 2133 9-11-10-27 i can run VTT and SA @ 1.1 V It's strange if those voltages degrade cpu's, as far as I recall Intel whitepapers say up to 1.3 is safe
  7. my C1 used tot do 5300 @ 1.475V under SS, the chip barely passes 5100 now with same temps under SS. chip never had more then 1.525V max VTT and SA used 1.2V....
  8. those are some serious clocks.. congrats on nice achievement
  9. thanks man, could be better, this was quick run
  10. is there a clock gen filter setting? put it on another value
  11. no, the untouchable failed him big time, he didn't even submit a score in that competition. I guess it is not the untouchable who has the blame, guess it is the modification itself the highest core clock was mine, 1500 MHz @ 1.59V on the stock VRM with VR mod. so now it's work, on the dutch forum it was the lack of competition. this has nothing to do with trolling, it's all about the hardware, everybody is interested in the benefit the untouchables give, well, in your case it was minimal. and i'm not gonna respond to your evidence-less accusations. we both know it's bullshit and you are the one trolling here saying those things ... again..
  12. yeah, on a dutch forum you told your results: you reached 1375/1225 on stock VRM and finished a run on 1400/1275 with the untouchable based on the ln2 scores from al the other users, its a very bad clocking card, even WITH the untouchable on it. or you are saying it is not the card but it is you? maybe I misunderstood
  13. What i understand from chiller his card was a bad clocker, his results with the untouchy on it were bad too. the 6670 I used was only modified with a Vmod for mem and GPU, it gave me 1500 MHz core and 1375 MHzmem
  14. off course, but I had them lying around, so why not test them, I'm using PSC now, no way hypers can do 2400 9-11-9-27-1T @ 1.65V
  15. must say that the 4 2GB 1866 c7 hyper modules I have here do 2133 7-8-7-21-80-1T @ 1.75V on Rampage IV Extreme (ok, other board, dut still hypers on x79)
×
×
  • Create New...