Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Monstru

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1126

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Monstru

    Bot support : Bot support in vBulletin 3.8.3

    in Support

    Posted

    Ticket ID: 453

     

    Priority: High

     

    Please help me figur ethis out:\r\n\r\n1. If the bot scans the forum I get this error:\r\n\r\n[info] hwbot #3684 is instructed harvest the forum for new results, worker: TP-Processor1707\r\n[info] Loaded 0 results from 0 forumposts from previous scans.\r\n[warn] Error, failed to contact external host: http://lab501.ro/forumshowthread.php?t=128&page=1\r\n[info] Done harvesting the forum for results.\r\n\r\n\r\n2. If the bot tries to update the ranking, I get this error:\r\n\r\n[warn] Failed to edit first page: The response did not contain the required authentication cookie(s), it should contain bbsessionhash, bbpassword, bbuserid but none were received. Either the supplied password or login is incorrect, or your forum software is not supported.\r\n[warn] stacktrace:\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.util.WebPageImpl.login() line 377\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.persistence.Forum.login() line 121\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.service.BotServiceImplV2.updateFirstPost() line 633\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.service.BotServiceImplV2.updateForumRanking() line 397\r\n[warn] org.hwbot.facade.BotFacadeImpl.updateForumByBot() line 507

    Cheater likes photoshop

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    lol i just went to check some of the top 20 and the first score from hipro5 doesnt even have checksum in screenshot

    it's covered by CPUz screen

     

    why would you guys check that and approve it if it doesnt comply with screenshot requirements even though it is George and we know he can be trusted > it still shows a bad example

     

    i'm assuming it a slight oversight from all parties

     

     

    If old George will ever cheat, I will cut my balls and feed them to my dog :)

    Vantage scores deleted

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    WTF...I write "checked" when I check a score that is OK, after someone reports it. Your score is perfectly ok, but it seems that I chose "incorrect sumbission" by mistake. My bad, score is back up :)

     

     

    If there are any other scores like this, please give me the link and I will fix them.

    Formula One Overclocking Contest

    in General overclocking

    Posted

    It's a concept, like every concept. With it's goods, it's wrongs and so on. It's not the most important thing for overclockers and it's not going to be the last competition. It's a manufacturer's competition, it may have a great succes, it may fail, we'll live and see how it's developing. If the second year is with qualifiers, that is a good thing and everybody is looking forward to that I guess. Untill then I am really curious to see some of the titan's clashing, after the names I have seen on the first page. BWHAHAHA this will be nice to see!!!

    Hadrware sharing spoted AGAIN?...

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    They have definately used the same OS, same tweaks, and maybe same rig without CPU and RAM. Unfortunately the HWBot rules only prevent users from using the same CPU for 2D benchmarks, so not much we can do by the book...Even if they have benched together, on the same platform, right now the rules only say about the CPU, nothing else. Probablly they used the same HDD, with the same tweaked OS and such.

    LAB501-CrazyPC Extreme Overclocking Party

    in Announce event and group sessions

    Posted

    Hey guys,

     

    from 22th to the 24th of May 2009, in Romania, we will organize the first Extreme Romanian Overclocking Party, where all extreme romanian overclockers will be present. We will have an overclocking bootcamp, with 3 days of benching, eating, drinking and sleeping together, in rural conditions. Basically, we are 10-15 nice gentlemen like myslef (:D) gathering together in a small rural house, with no bath, and an outside wooden toilet, with lots of pork and beer, but most important, with TONS of hardware and LN2. We might or we might not do some serious HWB damage, but I wanted to inform you guys ao you know what's going on on our side.

     

    The equipment list looks like this:

     

    CPU's:

     

    2 x Intel i7 965 (C0)

    3 x Intel i7 920 (C0)

    2 x Intel i7 920 (D0)

    3 x Intel E8600

    Intel Q8400

    Intel 631

    AMD Phenom II 955

    and some socket A CPU's

     

    MB's:

     

    2 x Asus Rampage II Extreme

    Asus Rampage II Gene

    Asus P6T Deluxe

    Biostar T-Power X58

    DFI UT X58 T3eH8

    EVGA Classified

    Gigabyte X58 Extreme

    Gigabyte X58 UD5

    Gigabyte X58 UD4

    2 x Asus Rampage Extreme

    2 x Biostar T-Power i45

    Gigabyte EP45-UD3

    Asus M4A79T Deluxe

    Asrock M3A790GXH/128M

     

    GFX's:

     

    4 x GTX 295

    3 x GTX 285

    3 x GTX 280

    3 x GTX 260

    2 x 9800GX2

    3 x HD4770

    10 x 4890

    3 x 4870

     

    RAM:

     

    3x1GB Corsair DDR3-1600 C8 (Elpida)

    2x2GB Corsair DDR3-1600 C9 (D9)

    2x1GB TEAM DDR2-1066 C5 (D9GKX)

    3x1GB Kingston T1 DDR3-2000 C8 (Elpida Hiper)

    2x1GB Kingston T1 DDR3-2000 C9 (D9GTS)

    2x1GB Kingston DDR3-2000 C9 (D9GTR)

    3x2GB AData DDR3 1600 (Elpida)

     

    PSU:

     

    Antec Signature 850W

    2x CoolerMaster RPP 1250W

    Coolermaster UCP 1100W

    OCZ EliteXtream 1000W

    2x Seventeam 1200W

    Ultra X3 1600W

     

    Cooling:

     

    2 x Kingpin Tek 9 5.0

    Kingpin Tek 9 4.0

    Kingpin F1EE

    2 x Duniek CPU semi-solids

    2 x Ryba CPU semi-solids

    CrazyPC Solid Copper CPU pot

    2 x Duniek semi-solid GPU Pots

    1 x Ryba semi-solid GPU pot

    3 x CrazyPC Solid GPU Pots

    countless NB pots

     

    Plus lots of other stuff I forgot about...

    PCMark05 HB Rules,FM Rules and correct submision for ranking.

    in General overclocking

    Posted

    I don' have time to answer most of the point you are making, cause they are not worth it now. We all know that you are good bencher. We all know you can tweak systems well, but there is no need to always bring these same issues up. Someone is always better than you, no matter what is the matter. THIS IS NOT the case here. It is all about the PCMark05 benchmark itself.

     

    Bro, I really do not see any difference between my point and what any of the other guys posting here except you and Gautam. It's not about me, I really don't like PCM05 so much (you have to have "best appearance" set, and Windows Media Player or converter or whatever installed and so on...bleah!!! that is not a bench OS :D ) and I really do not care about PCM2005 so much....in fact...I pretty much dislike it, just like I really don't like Aquamark. But there are guys that do and I think that there should be a more relaxed dialogue between HWB Crew and those guys. HWB is first of all a community made of benchers, so when you want to make that kind of decisions you should also take into account the opinion of the community. It's not about what you want or about what you think, heck...if I would be HWB Crew I would probably take out Aquamark instantly, but probably that would not be fair to those who like it. Be more relaxed, see their point of view, and find a solution together. That is all that I am saying.

     

    And yes, you guys have a strong argument with 9000MB/s, we all know that that is not real. But neither are those those >1000 fps that we see in Nature or Mother Nature. Sure, you can have that ammount of FPS in an old game using new hardware, but besides the fact that most of the games have a cap, anything over a constant, solid minimum of 60-75 fps really does not matter. So the situation is kindda similar. Benching is one thing, real life is another thing :)

×
×
  • Create New...