just_nuke_em

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2408148 Rasparthe said it was likely due to the board not supporting the chip, but I think this is related to the bug also...

Damnit! lol. Awesome job dude. Truly epic! I might have answer for this later this week...

Very nice. Glad it still lives

Any idea what the batch code was?

Nice freq

These newer chips suck. Didn't like high NB speeds as far as I can tell and I was keeping ram low to try to figure out why it was crashing. Didn't get enough time to tweak it more due to time constraints.

don't expect anything amazing, my efficiency is horrible compared to you guys.

Overvolting supported by MSI Afterburner = MSI: "we doesn't support overclocking" ^true story, had a rep tell me that

Did you test each core?

Bored at work, so I'm entertaining myself with this. Been looking as this for some time now, and with the two new results coming in today I thought I'd bring this up and see if a discussion is worthwhile. Maybe I'm looking for something that isn't there, but there seems to be a connection to ram freq with max freq on these chips. All the really high chips have 900mhz+ while the lower ones have ~700mhz (save for a few outliers). Granted this analysis doesn't take into OC methods (did they use PScheck, just boot with high multi and up HTT, ect). Considering I saw 1000mhz difference in some of my cores, this might be a mute point if everyone didn't test each core individually. I duno, I'm bored

Backup activated! Damn nice freq there.

CPUz is reporting it wrong, but it is validating it. FSB is 266. Or am I the only one that sees a QX9650 @ 5ghz with 1.2v incredible unrealistic , and on a 4coredual-sata2 of all boards. I guess no one seems to care, so I will keep doing what I'm doing.

It'd not the board (CHV). Except for the 8150, which I sold right away, all chips experienced similar behavior on 4 other boards (CHIV, CHIII, 790X-UD4P, and M2RSH). While each of those boards have been run all the way cold with no issues.

I have an 8150, 1090T, 1055T, and two 555BE's that do that

Nice. I don't think I will be able to beat that

So I'm benching my AGP cards, and cpuz reads this: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2408148 despite the fact that the fsb is 266. Is this going to be a problem? or should I spend time figuring it out

Very nice.

Definitely could be beaten to death. Hard to tell when buying used

Wooo, graduation parties rock. Except when they interrupt benching

Going to rerun with these http://hwbot.org/submission/2222644_just_nuke_em_wprime_32m_phenom_ii_x4_955_be_6sec_62ms Can't wait to have more competition I duno. I don't claim to be a ram tweaking expert at all though

They are F3-16000CL8T SN# 9500690091918, so I guess they are hypers. Not very good ones imho.

Everyone keeps telling me they are hypers, but my good hypers will do 6-6-5 @ 1800 and these won't, so I duno...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuIJRsAuCHQ

Oh, it has an antenna. You just have to look harder for it

From: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/asus-tweet-stirs-controversy.html