[A7N8X-E Deluxe as an alternative for socket 462]

27 minutes ago, Sparks.nl said:

My 8rda6+ pro does not do a multi over 12,5x. 

Strange, maybe this needs some more investigation for the Pro series. What PCB ver and BIOS have you been using? CPU has a free multi?

[A7N8X-E Deluxe as an alternative for socket 462]

15 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:

The Pro boards seem to have the same but stronger VRM.

Also they have a 5-bit FID meaning work fine with multi over 12,5. I've got 8RDA+ Pro and 8RDA3+ Pro. 8RDA6+ Pro is the same with additional controllers (SATA AFAIK).

[PLEASE ADD OTHER HARDWARE THREAD:]

3 hours ago, aGeoM said:

MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/mag_x570_tomahawk_wifi_ms_7c84/

[Lpddr3 category]

14 hours ago, mickulty said:

a problem with CPU-Z, it still calls the Athlon 3000G 12nm Picasso, it's 14nm and a 2-core die.

A CPU-Z txt report file would be useful on this one.

Thank you for clarification, I indeed messed up LPDDR3 with DDR3L. Again, we need txt reports from such systems to help with reporting this bug to CPU-Z author. I could contact Franck on this one.

[Lpddr3 category]

On 7/28/2020 at 8:54 AM, yosarianilives said:

lpddr3, Imho it's as much Ddr3 as fbdimm is ddr2 or gddr4/5 is ddr4.

Nope.

On 7/28/2020 at 8:54 AM, yosarianilives said:

The data widths, etc are completely different from Ddr3 memory among a number of other differences.

Not exactly. LPDDR3 standard permits use of different data widths but in case of general notebooks it's not quite so. Generally speaking DDR3L or LPDDR3 SO-DIMM module is simply one that can work at 1.35V. Usual DDR3 SO-DIMMs work at 1.5V. So generally speaking any DDR3L module will work in DDR3 environment and vice versa, a DDR3 SO-DIMM that works stable at 1.35V will work in DDR3L system.
Thus speaking, I don't think it's necessary to make a separate category for them especially since CPU-Z doesn't tell them from regular ones.
I'm open for arguments and opinions though.

[TaPaKaH - Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 6540MHz - 7min 10sec 750ms SuperPi - 32M]

Excellent score, Mr. Trololo ))

[ShrimpBrime - DDR4 SDRAM @ 4133MHz - 4133 MHz Memory Frequency]

Fixed your sub. It was hilarious though :D

[PLEASE ADD OTHER HARDWARE THREAD:]

8 hours ago, klopcha said:

https://hwbot.org/submission/2798073_intelguy_3dmark03_radeon_hd_3450_8387_marks

GPU clock says it's 3470.

[I.nfraR.ed - Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton) @ 3182.5MHz - 3182.53 mhz CPU Frequency]

Nice to see you back, @klopcha

[PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:]

23 hours ago, Dry_Ice777 said:

FJNBB0F

Already here.
 

 

23 hours ago, Dry_Ice777 said:

Extensa 2519

Added:
https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/extensa_2519/

[PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:]

4 hours ago, Dry_Ice777 said:

LNVNB161216

Already here: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lnvnb161216/

One hell of a name.

5 hours ago, Dry_Ice777 said:

And CPU - AMD A6-9225

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/a6_9225/

[Aquamark wrapper won't run on old GPUs]

Don't see a thread on this case but current Aquamark wrapper doesn't work on old GPUs. Tested on Prosavage DDR, SiS 315 integrated and Mirage.

The benchmark itself works as usual. The wrapper shows a black screen for a second after you hit the run button and immediately pops back to main screen. Systeminfo, priority and the rest don't help with this one.
315.zip is SiS 651 chipset. Aquamark.zip is SiS 661 chipset.

Aquamark3.zip 315.zip

[TerraRaptor - Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 5144MHz - 13sec 219ms wPrime - 32m]

33 minutes ago, dinos22 said:

You are effectively changing the OS DLLs.

But not benchmark's

[PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:]

17 hours ago, StingerYar said:

Supermicro X11SCZ-F

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x11scz_f/

[TerraRaptor - Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 5144MHz - 13sec 219ms wPrime - 32m]

1 hour ago, TaPaKaH said:

Isn't replacing of DLL files technically considered "illegal practice"

 

27 minutes ago, TerraRaptor said:

It is not part of the benchmark.

It's pretty much the same as changing DirectX which also affects 3DMark but is legal because you don't touch the benchmark itself. But if you replace the audio encoder dll in PCMark, this would be illegal as it is part of the benchmark.


Excellent tweak and thanks for sharing!!!

[PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:]

9 hours ago, Dry_Ice777 said:

IRBIS NB116

Added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nb116/

[TerraRaptor - Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 5144MHz - 8min 41sec 750ms SuperPi - 32M]

Excellent, first place!

[TerraRaptor - Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 5104MHz - 8min 51sec 828ms SuperPi - 32M]

Excellent work, Nikolay! )

[Bones - Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 5995MHz - 12min 16sec 360ms SuperPi - 32M]

Nailed it! Congratulations, Bones!

[Bones - Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 5756MHz - 4min 29sec 375ms wPrime - 1024m]

Excellent score, Doc!

[SArd - Radeon 9200/9250 (AGP 8x, 128bit) @ 398/281MHz - 2053 marks 3DMark03]

Old school power. Well done!

[Xevipiu - Pentium 4 2.4A Ghz (Prescott) @ 4415MHz - 25min 43sec 985ms SuperPi - 32M]

16 minutes ago, ozzie said:

or a SS head fitted on that p4c800e board in that pic ??

You're right, looks like SS.

1 hour ago, Xevi said:

but in 2014 this CPU-Z version 1.91 did not exist

Fine for me. But you should add a description that it's an old result so everyone knows. There's enough sandbaggers who can start arguing.

[Xevipiu - Pentium 4 2.4A Ghz (Prescott) @ 4415MHz - 25min 43sec 985ms SuperPi - 32M]

Hey, fella, nice score. But new rules require using CPU-Z 1.91 or newer. Don't forget to update for next scores. Cheers!

[PLEASE ADD MOTHERBOARD THREAD:]

On 5/24/2020 at 5:12 PM, StingerYar said:

AsRock FM2A78 Pro4+

added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/fm2a78_pro4_plus/

[Antinomy - 315 integrated (SiS 650/M650/651/740) - 2953 marks 3DMark2001 SE]

4 hours ago, gotohell said:

Use HWInfo+CpuZ

So?

You should stop cussing and do your homework. Integrated chips are fun because they're hard. You need to know some advanced stuff to show good results. It's not a thing for newbies. Uchi matchast' and good luck.