Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Antinomy

Crew
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1987

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Antinomy

    hwbot "classic" rev8

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, richba5tard said:

    Team points = sum of member points.

    Oh, so no team contribution (HW power points), now I see. I think we should take a second thought here if possible. Teams that bench a lot of hardware will drop down whereas high-end will benefit most. For now it's the only questionable thing to me.

     

    37 minutes ago, richba5tard said:

    Maybe remove the once which are too db hungry?

    I think we need to see the list. And another thing that's linked to achievements. Remember Pieters statistics with hardware hall of fame? I mean these:

    Would be very nice to see them alive too. Say an update twice a month is sufficient, maybe even once a month. If the consuming achievements are hardware ones, we could replace them bringing back Hall of fame since they are alike.
    Point is - I would like to see both achievements and HoF so let's discuss which ones are consuming and think a way out.

    • Thanks 1

    hwbot "classic" rev8

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    Thought #1 - keep hardware master, both ranking/league and calculations (sum of all). It has it's fun in benching all those obscure and/or old CPUs/GPUs. Something like collecting hardware, don't take it from people (and me too).

    As for season rankings - worth a try in addition to all time. It's pretty much like those US football season games and rankings, isn't it (I'm not big in to sports)?

    Team points you mean -sum of members Global+Hardware+Competition?
    Dumping oc-esports - fine for me, couldn't find anything there anyway.
    Are current achievements really this resource consuming?

    • Thanks 1

    Casanova - NG80386SX-25 @ 35MHz - 5.84 marks Speedsys

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by Antinomy

    Why don't you like the current category? I see you've submitted the NG80386SX--25 result right were it belongs. Maybe it requires some fixing Intel->AMD or even merging AMD&Intel together will look into that.

    I remember fixing the 486 ones fixing their sockets and so on about a year ago maybe I didn't make it to 386.
    Anyway, use the Support forum, make a ticket there, write what exactly do you won't and why the current category doesn't fulfil you. I'll check and fix if required.

    Unlocking multiplier on Phenom II?

    in AMD Thuban OC

    Posted

    There were several cases like that, I remember in AM2 era or maybe it was 939 when a lower multi CPU was installed after a higher multi and booted at it. I consider this a CPU bug pretty mich like the unlocked i5 3570 which was the last mention of such a "miracle". I don't think these are repeatable. But sometimes worth checking (unlocking multi on mobile Haswell with old CPU microcode).

    Mr.Scott - Radeon HD 2900 GT 256 Mb @ 851/1200MHz - 38317 marks 3DMark2001 SE

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by Antinomy

    Nice clarification, @GeorgeStorm!
    I thought general sense was enough to understand that each requirement has been added for a reason and to understand those reasons. Why was CPU-Z memory tabs added, GPU-Z, 3DMark windows and certain details on them. And why was Cinebench enforced (I got hit by this one though didn't know the cheat before obviously).

     

    But maybe since there are people that don't understand why certain windows are required and what info on them is essential, maybe it's worth specifying.
    @daimons, I've got a whole lot of such screenshots: http://hwbot.org/submission/3834865_ (not full memory page)
    http://hwbot.org/submission/3831473_ (not full CPU page)
    http://hwbot.org/submission/3831472_ (not full motherboard page)
    And a whole lot more, usually I don't put the full memory page on almost all my subs. Will you try to report them all?

×
×
  • Create New...