Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Antinomy

Crew
  • Posts

    1987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

Posts posted by Antinomy

  1. 13 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:

    And it might sound like a good idea to condense different GPU cores with little or no impact on OC in general for the sake of simplification of the db but I hope that we could find a general solution for the future where hardware gets matched to same hardware in the db, spec-wise, despite different names. 

    Agree on both. I prefer to make a thorough research before making big changes like this. Anyway, I think Mr. Scott will agree that a vanilla 7800GS has no chances against a super-charged 24 pipe Gainward 7800GS+. And we consider the pipes locked. It's fine for me when a certain beefed up version of a card is better (like the Goes like hell and Golden Sample cards are) - better memory, better cooling, slightly higher clocks. But what we have here is a card with different specs. Think of a 7900GS card sold as 7800GT (and 7800GS vanilla is even weaker than 7800GT).

    I like Greg's idea but we need to think of all cards that will get affected by this.
    7800GS will get handled but don't expect it in several days. It's been this way for years and no harm if it wait some more. Harm can be done by rapid decisions.

    • Like 2
  2. 2 hours ago, FUGGER said:

    But there are visible differences in socket 775 chips over the generations to tell what core it is for example.

    Well, the PCB color, thickness and SMD capacitors are different for different cores. But core can easily be identified by software. But not S-spec if we're speaking about unmarked CPUs.

  3. 3 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

    although not sure what it can be called

    Smth like "Xeon-W (base freq.) ES". Having the core count it quite uniquely identifies this SKU.

    My position for ES is approximately as follows: "apples to apples" - if ES follows specs of existing CPU (besides maybe stepping, TDP and unlocked multi), it goes to this category. Most ES don't have unlocked multi and most of them have lower o/c limit than retail (yeah, I remember Guldtown-A0).
    If a ES has different specs (like 26 cores in your case which is not seen in any other Xeon-W), it gets it's own category. Anything that falls out of this can be investigated separately.

    • Like 1
  4. You see the 26 cores? That makes it not a 3175X. This SKU will get it's own 26-core category pretty like the mobile Coffee-lakes discussed not long ago.

  5. 5 hours ago, klopcha said:

    2. We can make the exception because a new revision brings big changes.

    Happened before - Prescott E0 (64-bit), Deneb C2/C3. Same old picture.

  6. 1 hour ago, klopcha said:

    May be separate Sempron 754 (Palermo-D0) and Sempron (Palermo-Ex) already.

    No, we don't split categories by stepping. This question is not new and I don't think it's a good idea.

  7. 1 minute ago, MykolayZack said:

    Якщо б ще цей додали:

    Це очень старая ошибка, давно проблема есть.
     

     

    14 minutes ago, moi_kot_lybit_moloko said:

    wow

    У меня система на Mirage 1 делала 29xx в 01, но я решил сперва догонять D201GLY, а теперь мать не стартует. Думаю, больше 3000 возможно.

×
×
  • Create New...