Antinomy

Genieben, read my post attentively - I've been referring to Team hardware points

Again a bug with posting a submission with the same score: http://hwbot.org/submission/2421551_antinomy_cinebench_r11.5_core_i7_3612qm_5.65_points http://hwbot.org/submission/2468955_blu3_cinebench_r11.5_core_i7_3612qm_5.65_points/ Earlier there was a bug affecting personal score (ranking newer subs higher). Now it looks like the same bug with Team Power points. But I could submit without being affected by this bug: http://hwbot.org/submission/2447086_marquzz_pifast_core_i7_2640m_21.61_sec http://hwbot.org/submission/2492107_antinomy_pifast_core_i7_2640m_21.61_sec Was it fixed and if yes, how do we recalculate the old score affected? I tried to recalculate the score and to edit the submission - nothing.

Please, add MoBo VAIO VPCZ23T9R http://valid.canardpc.com/k5in7p

Happy Birthday, Pieter!

I must say that I totally agree with you. Just to clear things - I'm not mad with your joy. But for the years I'm here, I've seen enough "strange" results that turned out to be cheating (mostly edited screens) and from my experience it's much more likely that someone who I don't know is simply fiddling than using some knowledge beyond mine. It's nothing personal, do understand. But I'm afraid it'll take some time for the moderators to reproduce and check your mod. Fear not if you've got truth on your side.

I'm more impressed by 1837MB/s General Usage. I think this is a new world record, no less

I agree to ObscureParadox - unless it doubtful, I'd keep some of my tricks as a little advantage. I did put effort in some of my submissions and Mr.Scott, you are aware of it. This is a totally personal issue. If the moderators just said "we've checked this mod, it works and it's legit", I'd be fine without knowing what it is. But it is still to be checked - I don't get why the boards settings don't work and wires connected to same places do. Same for the pullup resistor remove.

riska, what you are talking about is Duron Applebred 1600MHz. And yes, all you've described is pretty normal. Mr.Scott, so it's an unsoldered L3 pullup with manual switches, what do you think?

Another little bump.

I already have one, it's Mr.Scott

Hi, sparkey! If you take a look here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=pentium_4_s478 you can see two Pentium 4 2.6 - the "regular" 2.6 Pentium 4 2.6 GHz Northwood and Pentium 4 2.6 GHz C Northwood (HT) the latter is 200FSB and 13x multi. The regular is FSB100 and 26x multi. If you find x13 in your category, click report on them or write a PM to Genieben. Don't tell him I sent you

I'd say more like a bugged run - the 64 thread is way out of line.

But 512MB sticks clock better because - Winbond and Micron, yes.

Perhaps, you've meant - Intel CPUs starting from LGA1155. because besides 2600K there's LGA775 left and AMD. Or you mean the whole statistics, for AMD and old sockets too?

Some good old school. I like this freaky guy

Yep, Mendocino for 300A and Covington for 300. After these, Celerons used same cores as Pentium. Mr.Scott, nasty suggestion

There were none Celeron Deschutes. Only some cheaters disabling cache on P2

Have you tried to Google it? http://bios.hwtweakers.net/INTEL_p4/asus/p4c800%20deluxe%20rev1.x/tictac/ And where did you get a s478 with unlocked multi?

Thanks!

Thanks for the clarification, Massman!

Please, add SVE1713M1R: http://valid.canardpc.com/99ef0w

Excellent score!

Good enough for D0, congratulations! Mine was only ±4800 on water.

Not sure where this thread is going but not that I don't like it

Neatly packed candy