Antinomy

Because it's you who messed it in the first place. There's no such thing as Prestonia 180nm. Prestonia=Northwood and is always 130nm. OTOH, the 180nm is Foster=Wilamette. Like there can't simply be a 180nm Northwood, there's no 180nm Prestonia. http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%202%20GHz%20-%20RN80528KC041G0K%20%28BX80528KL200GA%29.html - here's a link for you As for 2.4GHz, there are three Xeon 2.4 - two Prestonia with FSB100 and FSB133. And the Gallatin 2400MHz that has 1MB (along with 512KB L2 like Prestonia). So the difference between first two is FSB and the third - 1MB L3 cache. One category Xeon 2.4Ghz (1MB L3, FSB100) should be deleted after submissions are sorted out.

Ticket ID: 1700 Priority: Medium I hope that the staff will stop sabotaging my work \r\n\r\n1) Move these: http://url.hwbot.org/12HRrLj\r\nhere: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_2.67ghz_fsb533/\r\n\r\n2) Rename Xeon 1.4Ghz (Foster 256KB L2) to Xeon 1.4GHz\r\n\r\n3) Rename Xeon 1.4Ghz (Foster 512KB L3) to Xeon MP 1.4Ghz (512KB L3)\r\n\r\n4) Rename model name from Xeon 1.6GHz (Foster) to Xeon MP 1.6GHz (Foster 1MB L3)\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_16ghz_foster/\r\n\r\n5) Rename Xeon 1.7Ghz (Foster 256KB L2) to Xeon 1.7Ghz\r\n\r\n6) Rename Xeon 1.5Ghz (Prestonia 1MB L3) to Xeon 1.5Ghz (Gallatin 1MB L3)\r\nand rename core name to Gallatin\r\n\r\n7) Rename Xeon 2.5Ghz to Xeon MP 2.5Ghz\r\n\r\n8) Rename Xeon 2.0GHz (1MB L3, FSB100) to Xeon 2.0GHz (1MB L3) and core name to Gallatin\r\n\r\n9) Rename Xeon 2.0GHz (Prestonia 180nm) to Xeon 2.0GHz (Foster) and core name to Foster\r\n\r\n10) Rename Xeon 2.4Ghz (1MB L3, FSB100) core name to Gallatin\r\n\r\n11) Rename Xeon 2.4Ghz (1MB L3, FSB133) core name to Gallatin\r\n\r\n12) Rename Xeon 2.4Ghz (512KB L2, FSB100) to Xeon 2.4Ghz (FSB100)\r\n\r\n13) Rename Xeon 2.4Ghz (512KB L2, FSB133) to Xeon 2.4Ghz (FSB133)\r\n\r\n14) Delete Xeon 2.0GHz (1MB L3, FSB133)

LOL, that's a good one! CPU-Z 1.99 - back to future.

GENiEBEN, you Artmoney'ed CPU-Z? you nasty bencher

Does this mean 1.64 valids support will be dropped in a week like you said before?

Thanks, I hope this will be fixed.

Just found a bug - I was making a cleanup in Xeon family, many submissions were in wrong categories. I've reported them as wrong category. And a few hours later one dumb user felt offensed by this and reported my old subs as "no photo verification". I don't need them as they were made before the photo rule. But! I've just realized that when the submissions I've reported will be moved in the proper place, the users will lose their points. Can you fix this? I don't want to take points from them (and they shouldn't as their subs didn't require photos back then) but I want to place subsmissions in their places. And making the database better along with hurting the user's points isn't fine for me.

I've just taken the idea from Winchip C6\2 - worked fine there. Looks like categories got bricked.

Ticket ID: 1696 Priority: Medium 1) Move\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_5260/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5270/\r\nto Xeon 5200 series subfamily\r\n\r\n2) Create Xeon 3000 series subfamily\r\nand move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3040/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3050/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3060/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3065/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3070/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3075/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3085/\r\n\r\n3) Create Xeon 3200 series subfamily and move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3210/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3220/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_3230/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3220/\r\n\r\n4) Combine Xeon X3220 and Xeon 3220.\r\n\r\n5) Rename Xeon 3210 to Xeon X3210, Xeon 3220 to Xeon X3220, Xeon 3230 to Xeon X3230.\r\n\r\n6) Create Xeon 3300 series subfamily and move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3320/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3330/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3350/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3360/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3370/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3380/\r\n\r\n7) Create Xeon 3400 series subfamily and move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_l3426/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3430/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3440/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3450/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3460/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3470/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x3480/\r\n\r\n8) Create Xeon 7400 series and move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_mp_e7430/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_ex_e7440/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_ex_e7450/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_ex_l7455/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_ex_x7460/\r\n\r\n9) Delete Xeon EX and Xeon MP subfamilies\r\n\r\n10) Create Xeon 6500\\7500 series subfamily and move there\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x6550/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e7520/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e7540/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x7542/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x7560/\r\n\r\n11) For http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e7540/\r\nchange core name from Tigerton to Beckton and socket 604 to LGA1567\r\n\r\n12) Move\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x7330/\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x7350/\r\nto Xeon 7300 series\r\n\r\n13) Delete Xeon X series (should be empty by now)\r\n\r\n14) Maybe make combined Xeon 3500\\3600 series, Xeon 3000\\3100 series and 3200\\3300 series for these Xeon UP?

Thank you Karl! #2 to come soon

Ticket ID: 1695 Priority: Medium 1) http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=intel_xeon\r\nLGA775 Core2 Quads should be wiped from there.\r\n\r\n\r\n2) http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_30_ghz_qa92/\r\nShould be renamed to Xeon E5 3.0 GHz (QA92 ES) and moved to Xeon E5 subfamily\r\n\r\n3) http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_w5580/ and http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_w5590/\r\nshould be moved to Xeon 5500 series subfamily\r\n\r\n4) Add Xeon E3 series subfamily (like E5 and E7) and move \r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1220/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1230/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1230_v2/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1235/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1245_v2/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e3_1265l_v2/\r\nthere\r\n\r\n5) delete http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_e5550/ - doesn\'t exist (not to be confused with X5550)\r\n\r\n6) Move\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5550/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5560/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5570/\r\nto Xeon 5500 series subfamily\r\n\r\n7) Delete X5440 (confused with E5440)\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5440/\r\n\r\n8) Move\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5450/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5460/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5470/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5472/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5482/\r\nto Xeon 5400 series subfamily\r\n\r\n9) Delete one of the Xeon E5472 (how do they even happen to appear both with the same name?)\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=xeon_5400_series\r\n\r\n10) Move \r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5350/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5355/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5365/\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_x5376/\r\nto Xeon 5300 series subfamily\r\n\r\n11) Rename Xeon X5350 to Xeon X5350 (ES)\r\n12) Rename Xeon X5376 to Xeon X5376 (ES)\r\n\r\ngot tired some more later.

Did someone say "Piednoel"?

Nice chip, casual RAM and very good result!

It's wytiwx, that explains a lot JK

DIP switches are back again, LOL

LOL, how lame

Good job, hackingtricks! I've worked on detection vurnerabilities that allowed some dishonest members to fiddle with CPU-Z making it believe that a different hardware has been used. Your vurnerabilities are of software protection for the validation process. I appreciate that.

Too late I suppose

Why do you think it's only two of em? http://occlub.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=3064 - here's a guy who has found several Haswell subs, as well as Radeon 8970 and stuff like Ivy-E. They have some sort of problems with the forum, so here's a copy (not up-to-date though): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&hs=74t&rls=org.mozilla%3Aru%3Aofficial&sclient=psy-ab&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Focclub.ru%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D3064&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Focclub.ru%2Fforum%2Fshowthread.php%3Ft%3D3064&gs_l=serp.3...65107.66308.0.66667.6.6.0.0.0.3.215.924.0j4j1.5.0...0.1...1c.1.12.psy-ab.kjYXMFORdTA&pbx=1

Wow!

Dead now: http://www.vr-zone.com/guides/Intel/Northwood/ http://www.vr-zone.com/guides/AMD/AthlonXP/ Will try time machine after. http://gamershq.madonion.com/lounge/fastestwebmasters/ http://www.clio.ne.jp/home/tatumiya/

Speaks for itself 16.01.2002 - 11000+ (exact score unknown): 1 and 2 25.09.2002 - 20372 - Muropakketi, 1 (not a record)

I'll start collecting frequency records here. First as a list of links and the I'll compile them for a submission. 14.01.2002 Holicho P4 2.2@3.54 - 1 and 2 16.01.2002 P4 2.2@3.67 - 1 and 2 19.01.2002 P4 2.2@3.7 - 1 and 2 23.01.2002 P4 2.2@3.8 - Holicho 1 29.01.2002 P4 1.6A@3.11 1 18.02.2002 P4 1.6A@3.64 1 and 2 19.03.2002 P4 1.6A@3.76 1 22.03.2002 P4 2.4@3.89 1 29.03.2002 P4 2.4@4.01 Holicho 1 14.04.2002 P4 2.4@4.11 Holicho 1 05.07.2002 AthlonXP 2200+@2.71 Son 1 19.08.2002 Pentium 4 2.4@4.3 1 29.08.2002 Pentium 4 2.8@4.3 1 02.09.2002 Celeron 1.8@2.51 and 2.53@3.52 TOPMO3 & Newsmaker 31.10.2002 Athlon XP 2700+ @ 2.32 1

Looks fine.

So this is the exHistory forum... Can't access the subforum from main page, only via direct link to http://hwbot.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=83 Because http://hwbot.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=92 is inaccessible for me (and thus doesn't appear on main page). Don't know whether a bug or a feature