Antinomy

Works fine for me. :woot: Guess there's a bug with some users.

Intel has a registration on HWBot and ? Oh, I wasn't aware of that

Of course it is my personal opinion just like any others. I'm not playing God here Add shipping costs and cheap goes to non-cheap. But I see your point, subcategories would be the best solution for both. Surf on Ebay for ES, you'll be surprised

der8auer, I agree to Bruce - the "Forbidden items for trading:" could be shrinked to one statement: don't want to see any BIOS reflash services in MoBo section (instead of the actual boards) and/or dozens of SATA cables sales. Or any Apple stuff (not a hater).Anything that can be used to clock for Bot is O.K. And hey, why are ES banned? What if I want to buy an old CPU that was only produced as ES (say, Pentium Pro 133 or Pentium XE 3.0)? Will there be subsections for certain hardware so you don't have to list 20-40 fan sales to find a few MoBo or CPU sales?

nice catch, Bones!

Looks like the search submissions page is broken: http://www.hwbot.org/search/submissions it doesn't filter by date (submitted between).

Devroush then why did my previous get points: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2327391_ ? I agree to GENiEBEN - it's supposed to get scores to my acc but doesn't count as top15 for my leagues scores. That's the way it always was.

I've got the stupid "Don't want any points" bug. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2355341_antinomy_superpi___1m_k6_2_533mhz_4min_38sec_781ms If I logout I can see that "Antinomy does not participate in the HWBOT rankings for points. " How did this checkbox get checked in the first way? I didn't check it. Why is it enabled by default despite the checkbox "I do not wish to participate in the HWBOT rankings." in my account is unchecked? That's the first dumb thing. Then I go to my submission, edit it and uncheck the "I don't want to participate in rankings" for this submission. Save changes, recalculate and... nothing. If I logout it shows that the submission still doesn't participate in rankings. I have the not participate enabled by default (better enable the read rules checkbox) and I can't edit it. Can I please have the other way around? Meaning - disabled "not participate" and no way to enable it by editing? Thank you in advance.

Kithylin, you've made a wrong generalization of the idea. There are obsolete tests like Sisoft Sandra once was - they are only for fun, not for points. So go get unique hardware! I've got a dual GPU RageXL and the only similar card is a "common" Rage Fury Maxx (which I also have). Results on it will be unique and I'll get my points when I bench it. Same goes for my Winchip CPU collection - results of only three models are presented on HWBot while I have more. Dead wrong. All my results so far are achieved without phase/LN2. Got beat my fresh K6-2+ 533MHz scores with your 550 and we get talking. http://hwbot.org/submission/2355341_antinomy_superpi___1m_k6_2_533mhz_4min_38sec_781ms http://hwbot.org/submission/2355344_antinomy_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_509.81_sec A hint - my superpi sucks, with common tweaks it should be easy to beat.

I've run 2.0V on air Nice run, Nikolay!

Dedicated to Tweak-venetica-

IIRC, inverters can cause instability for overclocked memory modules.

A photo doesn't prove, yes. But it confirms two things - first the CPU does exist and it's not a CPU-Z bug. And second - the user does have this CPU. For example, a Pentium Pro 133MHz does exist but for some users that were caught before I'd rather believe they emulated it than that they have this rare ES. Same goes for Pentium 1 vs Pentium 1 Mobile (CPU-Z isn't able to tell them apart http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=404891 ). User may assume that he has a mobile part because it's installed in a notebook (so he isn't trying to fiddle with the rules). But a photo might show that he has a desktop part in a notebook and the category was chosen wrong. I'd help out more but for the last years I was stopped by staffs ignorance. Until Ney came to the team and things started again.

And I'll do more THX guys. Very nice to have you around. All of you. Like I said to Christian before - the best way to validate that a result is in the right category for Pre-K8 AMD and Pre-370 Intel would be a photo. There's no way to verify a CPU 100% by software.

These were non-reference mods pretty much like the stuff with 6600/6800 (128-bit 6800, 64-bit 6600 and so on).

Like I said before - I've seen CPUs (and have a number of them) that do exists, are mentioned on hardware sites but are not listed on HWBot. But I've never seen a CPU that is presented on HWBot but not listed anywhere else in the Net. So c'mon and paint it black, Bruce

Oh, I remember the first one having hardware even more "fun" than this Still have some of his masterpieces saved on my disk.

Great news! You're one of those who still do their job, nice to look at the results.

I agree with Karl. That seems to be the case. And I don't believe it's a bug because by default multiplier is set on default value, not an altered one. Blah-blah.O.K. so that's your point. How about this submission? http://hwbot.org/submission/2335220_gigioracing_ucbench_2011_pentium_2_200mhz_4.9_mpt_score It's a different CPU. Let me guess - a bug again and no plastic cover either?

Hello! Please provide a photo of any of your two Pentium 2 200? A clear photo of the marking and its Sspec.

Hello! Please provide a photo of any of your two Pentium 2 200? A clear photo of the marking and its Sspec.

Terrific! Congratulations!

That could be only your testbed.

http://en.fishki.net/comment.php?id=127917

Thanks pal