Antinomy

It's nothing compared to installing OS on 486

It's not "like" 1T/2T - it is the exact thing. It's just another name for Command Rate.

*voice of Freddy Mercury* : "Can anybody find me..."

I'll check all my PM to you and will be banned for spreading insiders info Nice to hear!

I've tried to download the PC Treiber's mod BIOSes for various AsRock boards but failed. Does anyone have them for at least Conroe865PE and all PT880 boards? Changelogs and detailed info is appreciated That's why I suggest to make a mod and BIOS database on HWBot

I agree to Noir and 1Day - this should be a separate database. Maybe you can dupe the hardware categories, but not mix with the existing. Or make a link to archive from the existing hw pages to check who has made anything with this stuff before HWBot. It's a pretty nice idea and it widens mine that I've sent you about a year ago - to store all modification info on HW "info pages". For example - I find a good result on P4C800-E. I think - hey, looks like a nice board. Then I go here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4c800_e_deluxe And I see - damn, it's really good. But that's were it ends up - I've gotta go find it's specs on sites that reviewed it (the Asus site dropped info on it), I've gotta find mod BIOS if there are any of them. And then I've gotta find the voltmods or PWM datasheets to modify it. It would be very nice if everything would be in one place. Community could help in finding links and pics (or making their own pics), getting BIOS mods and voltmods. Add datasheets and you've got a nice info that much more handy than the existing one. What do you guys think? I've suggested to make a full HW specs table for video (DX support, TMU, ROP, pipes, manuf. process and other stuff) of all kinds. But that suggestion was dropped too. P.S. As for legal stuff - go and look how Web archive handles this. We can make it the same way.

falc, t0p_VD (local guys) and TiN. His article "born to crawl..." touched my heart. But more I was interested by THG (yeah, they're Prommy and LN2 adventures) and overclockers.ru at that time.

It's OCP, not OVP. OVP wouldn't allow you to set higher Vcore with any CPU. And this one is CPU dependant. I'll check for one.

We do, until facts force us to change our mind Christian Ney, no one can stop you from attaching photos for mentioned categories or when CPU-Z detects something incorrect.

It's an additional proof, not a 100% valid one. Just like any other

Good idea. I've suggested this some time ago with no luck...

Back on heavy drugs? Yeah, can't rehab that easy. Welcome to the real world, Sampsa!

Yeah, crappy Intel CPUs. They don't tell about their multi. While AMD even with 486DX4 do. There are only indirect (read as inaccurate) ways to figure that.

You're talking about cheating. I'm talking about suspicious results that can be achieved with legal overclocking

They are unlocked but only to lower values. So you can't usually set a 3 or 3,5 multi on 166MMX and can't set 3,5 on 200MMX. But I've got one of those that can.

The -SATA2 can go to 320MHz. The -VSTA can go up to 350.

Yeah, not to mention Pentium 1 and MMX with unlocked multi like one of mine that is 200 but has 3,5 multi working as an 233.

Hey, new moderators raise old problems I've written numerous times (enough to consider it hopeless) about CPU-Z fixes and cheat-proofing actions with no respond. Can you tell, what things are you working on? And what are your ideas about at least CPU-Z (since it good enough, we only need to make it better, no need to start from the beginning). I read PMs very often and respond quickly I managed to find four problems ATM (the discussed is the biggest and the most hard), found a solution for one of them with existing CPU-Z info. And found a solution for another one, reported to Franck and got the bug closed. And the last was already exploited by some nasty guys that deserved being banned but aren't because of lack of activity of the staff. Any discussion when it comes to facts and suggestions dies. Hope it won't happen with you

Wonderful!

Don't tell me that this time you'll be writing each from your own forum again

Google made a good job translating the shape but it's weak in retelling the containment In other words - making you able to read the text on a candy wrapper doesn't tell anything about it's taste. Bruce, don't break my heart by leaving my messages unanswered, I beg you

Moving here, I suppose: http://www.occlub.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=1344

Massman, generally you are right. But in this specific case - not exactly: It's an HWBOT overclocking teams discussion. Yet, I would prefer this not to happen. I haven't seen any constructive discussion between our regions teams.

Crap, not this subject again...