Antinomy

Oh, this one looks better! I checked both the wordpad and word, the result was the same as on the screen above. Thank you for your answer Opened in winword - everything's fine now! Am I correct thinking that the new full text pack (64.1Kb) includes the 3.6 text lines? Or I need all of them?

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/972050_sf3d_3dmark_vantage___performance_2x_radeon_hd_5970_52193_marks You are looking bad

I've remembered about another bug - assume you are looking at Abit BE6-II specs. http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/be6_ii?tab=2drankings#cpu-z First of all, the chipset page shows how much cups it has: http://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/440bx But when you want to look a detailed info - for example in what category did it help to gain the golden cup, you can't. The 2D rankings just show the score and points - not the medals and cups. Besides, I don't get how much results is shown in the short chart - if you look at CPU-Z you can see 6 results. When clicking the top 100, you see 8. For PCMark05 it is 2 and 3 respectively. Though all three would fit in the short one Oh, and how about the hardware masters country page and the Country hardware points page and country global points pages as Massman once has shown us?

Wow! A very nice one! Improving the results page would be as nice to see.

The top 5 most active teams is bugged: http://hwbot.org/rankings/teams/worldwide It tells that all teams ranked 3rd in global ranking - this obviously can't be right.

I've got some lines looking buged, for example: Is this normal or it's a bug? Looks like the symbols like ` ' " and so on are looking weird. The text is fine though. There's not much of them in the text but this makes understanding a bit longer.

This feature should check age before for sure

Happy birthday!

Thank you! It's a very nice decision about combining our neighboors in one stat. And I would like to ask about fixing the same thing but for team rankings. http://hwbot.org/rankings/teams/region/ - this tab isn't available from the team rankings page: http://hwbot.org/rankings/teams/worldwide evenmore it doesn't work - any selection will show an error page. And it would be nice if the country selection on the country rankings page would lead not to the rankings tab (which is the same page, only the country that is selected is highlighted) but to either the overclockers or team rankings for this country. Because if we seek the country page and click a country we usually want to look on a detalization not to highlight it's name I think the team tab as a link target would be better by default.

I want to clear out the region switch. The Russia switch means - exUSSR in fact, yes? Well, it's quite nice for me though doesn't correlate with the name (maybe some guys from Ukraine and Kazahstan won't be happy.) The Europe switch means - the Europe without exUSSR (Ukraine, Russia) And Asia - Asia without exUSSR (Russia, Kazahstan) Am I correct or this is a bug? It's a nice one anyway

The same for Pifast and Super pi - when you select the wPrime tab and switch to 2 CPUs, going to the single thread apps will show the results with 2*CPUs though they should be with the 1x CPU ones. If taking the same category as example, I mean this: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_4600_x2_brisbane?&tab=2drankings&hardware=athlon_64_4600_x2_brisbane&cores=4#superpi

sylphid44 2.4B has a multi 18, this one has 12. 12*200=2400 - it's a 2.4C. The HT not present means it's disabled and nothing more

The family ranking is nice, but a bit buggy - when you look at it, for example: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_1_60mhz?&tab=2drankings&hardware=pentium_1_60mhz&familyId=226#wprime_32m it show different number of results in each tab - some have 10, some 8, some only 5. Besides, if we click ot the view top 100, it show the category results, though we were viewing family results. And it would be nice if the number of cores in wPrime selection would be inactive if such results do not exist in this category. For example, more than 8 cores in Pentium 1 category is not what we will see in the nearest years. Thank you for attention.

richba5tard, no, that's not the right way. I'm not against the info stuff - on the contrary I suggested to make a description of each hardware category shortly after rev.2. It's great if we grow wider. The thing is in not making it less convenient making int more complex, don't you agree? The tabs made the result surfing process a bit longer an the only thing I said is how this can be resolved. If you remember, I suggested to clean up the hardware database (not results) from erroneous categories and typos (and offered help in this) - why would I say this if the rankings are the only goal?

I've a small suggestion about improving hardware database usability - it's most often used to check the current results, not to read the info more and more. So why don't you make the link for example: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_2.4ghz_a_northwood leading to the 2D rankings tab, not the info? It saves a bit of clicking which is anyway more than it was because of the benchmark tabs being implemented.

Nothing I didn't expect It was the first day of the competition that I said that he will jump closer to the end leaving competitors behind with a nice gap.

RB, should I wait until changes are applied from above or start translating the text from here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=6219 independant?

Your "small screen" is definetely bigger than mine. I can't see about 30% from the right. Maybe a scrollbar for the really small screens? 1152*864. But the overall placement is much better

Hm, it would be better to leave English by default. I personally and many others hate the localized mirrors of vendor sites because they are dumb. It's a habit that is hard to fight with. The same here - the translation is far from perfect and you put it by default. Or make a easy switch and English by default. Thank you

Thanks, that's why we can get the four times cheaper than 980X

What can you say about Q3NW and Q3Q6?

Thanks for the OS! Downloaded all but the new one and send my teammates. Gonna try them myself soon.

If I were you, I'd try to find a similar BIOS chip and flash the BIOS from other ABIT 875 and 865PE models. Maybe the MAXIII model BIOS will do the stuff. And yes - nobody denies clockgen boot at the frequency when dividers work and push in windows the speed you need. It's as easy as it sounds.

I've remembered about a new feature - the MoBo page. http://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/865pe http://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/875p Sapienti sat. The first link tells you to look only at Asus and maybe Abit IS7-E. The second shows how much the 875P grabs comparing to 865PE. Now I see that I'm lucky that got my hands on a P4C800-E.

Dreadlockyx, no, no. It's a crappy low-end Asus. And as many know - the low-end Asus is a crap worse than Asrock and MSI (in overclocking means). Get a normal P4P800 or the deluxe board. The one you found has a 865G chipset - with integrated video. And it's mATX. JLK03F150, nice stuff