Jump to content

Turrican

Crew
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Turrican

  1. till now i was never able to get cpu-z running in win 95/win nt 4.0 the newer cpu-z version doesn't seem to support older OSes than win 98. i hope i can find a cpu-z version which runs on those old OSes. officially cpu-z only supports cpus from the pentium 1 onwards.
  2. it's already there. http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_e3300_2.5ghz?tab=info
  3. @ Antinomy sorry that i couldn't provide those infos so fast, my hdd for the old systems is dead
  4. yeah, i also added the "post" screen.
  5. ok, added http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gt_320m
  6. hey bro i know of the problems when recognizing the cpu, i have it myself. i added it http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/am386dx_40
  7. bugged for sure. GT3 is way too high for this clocks.
  8. Turrican replied to cdawall's post in a topic in Support
    should work now
  9. Turrican replied to TaPaKaH's post in a topic in Support
    added http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/xeon_l3110
  10. can you plz provide a gpu-z screenshot?
  11. no problem guys
  12. the smileys are only there if you submit under "go advanced" of course. if you don't have them there you have selected the wrong "editor" in your user cp. go to "user cp" then "edit Options". at the bottom you can choose the "message editor interface". i think with the "basic editor" there are no smiley chooseable. you need to pick the "standard editor".
  13. hmm, if you post something with "advanced" there you see all aviable ones on the right. you just have to click them once so you know them
  14. as it can be seen here, a 486 DX which has a FPU is ~10 times faster in wprime than a 486 SX which has no FPU. in super pi it's even worse, because it heavily uses a FPU. here, the DX is around 25-30 times faster.
  15. yeah, i've tested a few 486 till dx4-100. i'll upload them today.
  16. it's already there http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x800_gto_pcie_ddr1?tab=info
  17. my 386 system is soon ready for that. i think it could work.
  18. yep around 50 days. i entered the right time but due some sort of "limitation" it shows times over 1 million seconds (7 digits) wrong. i hope RB can fix this.
  19. i've already run/tested a few socket 3 cpus the last few months.
  20. because it wasn't fully stable. it's not funny when you get "not exact in round" after a few days. since the cpu has no FPU it wouldn't save so much time, it's still rubbish. i hope the hwbot engine can be fixed so it displays the right time. atm it seems there are problems with more than 1 million seconds.
  21. ok, but i've to install win xp first. i have no "spare" os atm.
  22. yummy, they look awesome.