Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

michaelrw

Members
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by michaelrw

  1. serialization code unless anything has changed

     

    1st letter or digit = plant code (Malay)

    0 = San Jose, Costa Rica

    1 = Cavite, Philippines

    3 = .............., Costa Rica

    6 = Chandler, Arizona

    7 = .........., Philippines

    8 = Leixlip, Ireland

    9 = Penang, Malaysia

    L = ............, Malaysia

    Q = ..........., Malaysia

    R = Manila, Philippines

    Y = Leixlip, Ireland

     

    2nd digit = Year of production (2001)

     

    3rd & 4th digits = week (49th week )

     

    5th - 8th digits= lot number

     

    10th - 13th digits = serialization code

     

    cool thanks. but ive never seen the "10th - 13th digits". all of them ive seen on sandy/ivy follow the 8-digit format, like

    3218C021

    L204B515

    etc

  2. To everyone,

     

    I need to say sorry for my mistake , this is my careless and never double check my result. I really have 4m49s record using my ES , but this time we are using Cookie's OS and SSD. every OCER have their own OS Trim, we don't touch his Ghost image and let him arrange the result.

    Cookie's OS have a Capture.exe which can cap screen and save as jpg , the name is "screen0xx.jpg"after the benchmark session , Cookie copy all the screenshot to us.

    For Mad , He like to use his own capture software and I like to set clock Modulation to 50% or 82.5% , then open CPU-Z then back to 100% press "print screen", then back to Modulation to 12.5% save screenshot by MSpaint.exe , the filename is related to benchmark and result .png.

    In this time , We bench 2 days non-stop until he need to take taxi to air-port , he copy all of result to one USB drive then gone , he also left a lot of stuff in our office too.

     

    sounds plausible. and in my opinion, why would someone who has so much going for him risk it all for something like this. i believe it was an honest mistake, but that doesnt mean there shouldn't be a consequence. there should.

     

    After I finished the Plextor's event , I back to office and join UP7 benching party , Cookie is so crazy , we bench from 1:00 PM to 4:00 AM , sleep awhile then rebench again,

    One platform use my method to put rice + paper cat litter for benching because Mad's CPU have CBB @ -120C , you can see there are 2 different platform setup in our benching session.

     

     

     

    Why Christian Ney said he believe we have several 7GHz Chips , because we bench together through Internet , This is batch 3218C120 , we discuss how to use another method to keep CPU cooler rather then LHe, because LHe is not allow to use in Hong Kong. As u see , when my CPU reach -195.1C (my Type T line max is -196.4C) , the Rice and Cat litter is already -54.6C , just like we benching a room temp is -54.6C, we need faster cooling response time.

     

     

    i want to know more about this rice and cat litter. what are you using it for?

  3. It is, Intel "scanned" my lapped CPU and managed to know the batch/serial :D

     

    they have the ATPO printed on the PCB, there's no SN info inside the CPU

     

    Well, i definitely think intel should put that kind of information in their chips, or at least put it in the SKUs that are popular in the OC community (like 3570k, 3770k, 3930k, 3960x, etc). By including this information in the CPU and being able to view it in CPU-Z, all of these problems and accusations will be a thing of the past!!

     

    I know, this probably sounds absurd or far-fetched, but I do not think there is another way to verify what chip is being used. If enough of the pro overclockers and other "big-wigs" petition Intel (and AMD) for something like this, it could actually be done pretty easily. It would be a great change for the overall good of the community.. progress

  4. in the end there is no solid factual, concrete evidence that proves hardware/screen sharing occurred (just highly likely and extremely probable:))

     

    The only 100% way is to have cpu-z report batch+serial of the chip being used.. Which I don't think is even possible access that information through software.

  5. is there an official "rule book" ??

     

    for what its worth, i think you guys do a good job at keeping everything as fair as possible. im sure its hard to be in your position, esp with tons of people trying to do your job for you.

     

    it would be nice if there was a way to have CPUZ identify the serial/batch of chips..

    also, i think mainboard tab should be mandatory

  6. I have one of them.

    I believe it is a Venom Rev 4 or Rev 5, I have the Rev 5. They have all Intel/AMD mounting except 2011.

     

    Earlier Venoms were AMD only, and square-ish.

     

    Anyway, huge pot with huge mass and SA = huge cold huge everywhere. ... ><

     

    good deal, thanks guys! sorry for going off topic..

    back on topic now :D

×
×
  • Create New...