Alex@ro

April 19, 2015

Pending payment.

April 19, 2015

You got pm,no tcwl6 results,only loaded profile and quick test on volts.

April 18, 2015

Hello,

Selling this kit since i already got something better.Mint condition,top shape.Will do 2600 tight 8-12-8 with 1.87 and 8-12-7 with 1.89 V. Not the best on mhz/volts but good trcd and trp limits,able to boot 2600 8-11-8 at 1.80V and do 1M.

Price is 80E shipped in Europe,for other countries please ask.

April 14, 2015

strong result! how was this cpu under air/water?

April 8, 2015

Make your bets,this is going to be the most epic sandbagging ever on hwbot,if only someone can crash the server one hour before competition ends

April 4, 2015

strong score!

April 2, 2015

Nice man ^

Had a chance to stability test some new PSC I bought not to long ago

1.91v and all air

Kangaroos might binned and now hold a special stash of PSC from where u buy these,really nice air on ram at least and i am sure they will rock on cold.What type of IC,X.. ?

March 31, 2015

why x8 ,mobo issues?

March 22, 2015

Each thing that seems too good to be true probably it is not true...

February 28, 2015

seems not bad,how much for 4500 air?

February 18, 2015

paid and sold,thnks hwbot

February 18, 2015

As said in original post ,no subzero tests.

February 18, 2015

Hello,have for sale a really nice cpu.I played with it a few days,it has strong core,cache and imc.Able to do 5 ghz cinebench at 1.32V,1.34V is good for XTU and also 5300 1.5 gets all the 3d's running easy which should be a interesting cpu for enthusiast league 4900 cache is good and imc can clock samsungs up to 3000 without problems.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2759537_alex_ro_3dmark2001_se_radeon_hd_4850_gddr3_125205_marks

Spi 32M is ok at 1.26V on normal ambient 4c/8t and high cache and proper ram setting with windows 7,on Xp 1.24 is doable.

I am asking for 420E shipped in EU,cpu comes in original box with unused cooler and warranty papers.

CPU is not delidded and i had attached running temps on screenshots,not runned on cold.

Preffered method is paypal,buyer takes care of fees.

February 12, 2015

That one is dancop's cpu

February 12, 2015

Also price is too damn high because being in thi batch does not guarantee you a crazy overclock...I had a few L310B what could not boot 5 ghz on air so be carefull....

February 10, 2015

Unbelieveble,now it's time to reball some proper DDR3 on that board

February 3, 2015

Give me your 2400c8 pis and i'll get you some

Submission & member moderation · February 2, 2015

Oh,and regarding details,look at this type of submission,in fact look at a lot of XTU subs without print screen:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2569509_doc.brown_xtu_core_i5_4670k_1267_marks

You can see a lot of detail and this is a fully valid result right?Instead the submission that were blocked had far more details but considered insufucient proof no?

Submission & member moderation · February 2, 2015

Yea right...But check hwbot prime,there it says the name of the cpu....You know what the bunnyextractiontiest part is with my scores?The fact that i got them in Asus Aooc in Moskow live benching with 20 persons including Massman around So the result is 100% valid but the sumission is not?

It is my right to be annoyed that with one click Christian Ney bunnyed all of our work because the regulations are not damn clear in first place.

Want to chance something on the road? Do it by clearing the rules and blocking future submissions....

Submission & member moderation · February 2, 2015

It's the same checksum and score,you are implying that i could had saved the score,then set background(you see position of wrapper is different too ) then change hardware platform and finally save screen?

This is just another way of overdoing things in hwbot style.A proper way of moderation was to check all these results to see if that's ok,after all it is some hard work and spent money here.Then change the wrapper and make it do the screenshot only after cpu-z and gpu-z opened.

Basically to check i made a proper submission i need to have permanent second computer to verify data file,internet connection,etc.Have we forgot overclock is about a passion and not how to make spectacular correct submission and be afraid that someone will erase it after a few months ?

Submission & member moderation · February 1, 2015

Obviously a personal vendetta is going fine

Hello,

An HWBOT moderator, "Christian Ney", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'.

This was the reason the user gave:

oops "

So instead of finding a mature way like modifying the wrapper like Albrecht said the main job is to remove hard-worked past scores .

My issue is:

A valid score is getting removed because the damn submission is not ok by some rules that are not really clear.The problem is the submission is not by the rules but the score is ok,so how can we improve if we focus on quality of submission and not of the scores?

Submission & member moderation · February 1, 2015

Yes,but that is not clearly written in the rules which makes you a communist for blocking already uploaded results.

So wtf is wrong with this result beside your stupid rule:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2681654_alex_ro_aquamark_geforce_gtx_980_559111_marks

See here:

screenshot made from the wrapper,could not save screenwhot from wrapper when opened cpu-z and gpu-z,only by standalone app:

screenshot made by standalone app,exact same score,checksum with all details ok:

What exactly is wrong because from the way the rules are written there is nothing wrong.It says verification screenshot,not the verification screenshot from the wrapper file.

I expect Massman to have a word in this because every rule should be properly written and when it is modified to have it;s effect on future submissions,not past.

Submission & member moderation · February 1, 2015

Hy there folks,

Today two of my hard-worked submissions were removed in an absolute communist way by Christian Ney.

Now,what is this about:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2681654_alex_ro_aquamark_geforce_gtx_980_559111_marks'>http://hwbot.org/submission/2681654_alex_ro_aquamark_geforce_gtx_980_559111_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/2686469_alex_ro_hwbot_prime_core_i7_4770k_7084.07_pps'>http://hwbot.org/submission/2686469_alex_ro_hwbot_prime_core_i7_4770k_7084.07_pps

The problem,i mean the etternal problem appears with the wrapper.Nowdays is getting tougher and complicated to just post a bench results because of this.And i might add it is not a proper way to encourage this damn " sport " by making things harder then they already are.

Ok,so what is this about.In the submission i do not have the info's in the wrapper picture but in an additional screenshot i provided.The reason i could not make a proper wrapper screenshot is because each time i opened all cpu-z and gpu-z together with wrapper and tried to make screenshot within wrapper(save file ) i got a crash.

Obviously i see no problem in my submissions since:

1. it is the same identical result with same checksum

2..In the rules it says:

http://hwbot.org/news/882_application_10_rules/

Verification datafile Mandatory for submissions

then :

Verification screenshot requirements

Aquamark3 main window

Aquamark3 score and subtest scores

CPU-Z CPU tab

CPU-Z Memory tab

CPU-Z Mainboard tab, if IGP has been used

GPU-Z Graphics Card tab (Rivatuner may be used if GPU-Z fails to correctly report the GPU)

Since we are talking about two different things:

verification datafile

verification screenshot

It does not say the verification screenshot from datafile...

Now since Christian Ney takes his actions in communist style,that means he usually takes action then ask questions,or only takes actions by his own decision i find this a stupid situation.

This person probably does not know how much hard work is behind a result that sometimes is wasted because of the damn wrapper.

Secondly my both sumission were done near other benchers in Moskow arena and in the presence of the "overlord of overclocking" Massman Pieter.

Basically,i see things chance on-the-fly here with effects on submission that were done in the past and considered ok.

If my submission was not ok in the first place i should had been notified but this was not the case because Chrsitian Ney probably slept in his underwear or was too busy building his review-site.

Secondly,the point here is that the result is perfetly fine and valid but due to the glitches in regulations the submission is being wrong.

I see that things are not encouraged to get as friendly an easy they could be,but instead submitting a result nowdays is rather a complicated and frustrating thing to do....

Same stupid rules on this submissions:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2490850

http://hwbot.org/submission/2672977

http://hwbot.org/submission/2686469

http://hwbot.org/submission/2653975

http://hwbot.org/submission/2747364

http://hwbot.org/submission/2637707

http://hwbot.org/submission/2498596

http://hwbot.org/submission/2480041

http://hwbot.org/submission/2541683

http://hwbot.org/submission/2497139

http://hwbot.org/submission/2532061