Doug2507
-
Posts
940 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Doug2507
-
-
Think that's what Nick said also, circa 1.8v was the limit when he ran cold. Still, not much else can come close for now against freq/timings.
Ball hair away from haswell 5g! Great effort!
-
Much scaling after 1.8v?
Looking forward to this board going public!
That USB3 pcie?
-
I'd expect 3400 11 11 11 or less with b die on air on x99, looking forward to testing!
-
Don't see the point in those, just get b die and put em in x99. E die ran no problem.
-
Sorry, just saw this thread.
All chips I've sold do as I stated in sale threads. If any of them don't I would quite happily take them back but all have done exactly as stated barring any minor difference in board used etc.
You're running setup orientated for a different kind of use. Can't compare the two tbh.
You're voltages in that original post are fine, nothing wrong with SA as long as board doesn't overvolt. .380 was circa 1.19 iirc. Check with DMM to measure actual volts. You should be able to run 32m 4c/8t on XP with no issues at all 5g/5g with those voltages. That's what it was sold as.
Never tested it on cold though, if it run's hot give it to someone that can! It might be good as all had low VID.
-
And received.
Mods please move to sold.
-
Chip is same as my current one. I'd be selling between 400 and 500 euro. I'd be guessing maybe 80 euro for pi as untested. Maybe 120 euro for patriots as no cold testing and 2666 8 12 8 rather average. No idea on board but BP bought FK's recently so maybe ask him.
-
Rare gpu!
-
Back home new year. Shout you then.
-
So a gather increased bclk needed with 6100 is no problem....
Cheaper always good!
Nicely done!
-
FYI, tridentz seem to he sold out in Europe, ripjaws still available though. Be quick.
-
Wouldn't even buy 1!
In for results though!
-
Expensive kit!
-
Be selling a pair of blocked kpe s come January if you're interested Marc. Both well matched iirc. Might be able to do a 275 as well....
-
Sounds good for top spots. Obviously deserve a good proportion of overall % due to time/effort/skill etc etc needed for them. I'm kind of on side with Rauf on this and think drop away point could maybe be around 10th place.
Does HW threshold need changed? I thought original discussion/direction was to reduce 3d threshold for better balance?
-
Totally, would have been good to see what it could've done, by me or anyone else. Such a waste. Sh1t happens I guess.
-
No. Chip was killed before I even got it. Seller got water on the board and tried booting for 1-2hrs. Killed IMC. Worked single channel but no dual.
-
Well, here's hoping! Wish the last one wasn't killed by seller before I got it, would have been a monster. This one should hopefully do well enough though!
-
Quickly learning never to expect the same results on cold compared to ambient Dan!
-
L536B248
1.22 VID (Asus)
5.1 hwbprime 1.39v
5.0/4.9 CB15 1.41v
Cold testing soon.
-
I think the general conflict here comes from the fact that some guys are heavily into newest generation (maybe because HWBOT rewards that but probably because next generation is always cool) and some that are heavily into vintage or hardware benching, and then a great number that are in the middle.
Maybe HWBOT should allow each individual overclocker to make the choice for themselves.
Perhaps every overclocker is given a set number of submissions and you can spend them how ever you wish. If the max for Globals is 100 (as some have proposed) and the max for hardware is 50 (as currently allowed), So every global score will cost you 2 submissions and every hardware submission will cost you 1 submission. If the max submissions that count are (throwing out numbers) 40, you can split them how ever you wish. Put all 40 points in globals (20 submissions allowed), or all points in hardware (40 submissions allowed).
It would be equal playing field for both kinds of overclockers if you allowed the potential max points for each submission to be equal. That is why I proposed 2 hardware subs equals 1 global. If each overclocker is allowed to reach the same potential points but they can choose how its done, perhaps it wouldn't feel like an unlevel playing field for one type of overclocking or the other.
Just another idea to muddy the waters even further.
I think this is getting off the beaten track and away from original OP with regards to 2d/3d balance....
Don't increase global points, smooth out slope a bit (still giving top 10 (ish) the bigger % point reward as deserved), lower threshold. Job done. No point complicating matters further imo.
-
100000000000% efficiency!
Oh, hang on, submitted for wrong bench....
-
Get that 6700 on the go!!!
-
DDR4 Geil 4000 c19-25-25-45 (samsung-b)
in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)
Posted
I was same cas/freq with e die Dan. Be interesting to see results with b die quad same freq. Maybe a little tighter on cold. I can see some bench reruns happening soon!