[TSHardCore - 4x Core i7 930 @ 5059.9MHz - 5059.9 mhz CPU Frequency]

welcome to Overclocking Heroes oc team

 

in addition, tnks dear alex

 

You welcome my friend

[TSHardCore - 4x Core i7 930 @ 5059.9MHz - 5059.9 mhz CPU Frequency]

Fixed only one cpu, btw nice chip

[Ximi , account blocked ....]

Sorry guys, i write in spanish for Ximi,

 

Ximi, en el momento que se tomó la desición de su sansión, todo el Staff estaba enterado y también se realizó un debate, siempre se hace ésto.

 

No es una medida tomada solamente por una persona, todos hemos intevenido en la discusión.

 

El Staff de Hwbot es un grupo de trabajo, y siempre se discute cada cosa entre todos.

 

En ese momento SamOCX era parte del Staff y tiene todo nuestro apoyo, ya que él también intervino como yo mismo lo hice en tu caso.

 

Las sansiones no se pueden cambiar, ya que se necesita que TODO el Staff esté de acuerdo, y eso es realmente muy difícil.

 

Solamente te resta esperar un poco nada más, mientras tanto puedes seguir jugando con su nuevo hardware, para luego de transcurrido el mes, (que ya queda poco), puedas subir los nuevos resultados.

 

Se paciente.

 

Un saludo

 

Sw

[Democritise HWBoints]

The text file seems rather unsafe, but not if that part is vital.

 

I know 2 hack methods for this (including verification file / site validation),

 

I know that too.

 

Think, if "Sweet" know how to hack this, everyone knows

 

 

 

Talking about Pcmark:

 

You need a sys bench, and 2004/Vantage/7 are not popular, nor will ever be.

 

 

Uffff...anyway PcMark'05, is older, highly insecure, today very few use and also highly hacked, and does not measure system capability, hack only measures.

 

But, if you wish ? so, then continue.

[Democritise HWBoints]

Sorry Guys but PcMark'05 is out, no ?

[Moose83 - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 5336MHz - 41312 marks PCMark 2005]

Hey Moose, this sub. of Pcmark is out of the line with the rules, please delete and run again, VS is too much high.

 

Regards

[Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed]

The rules was already were published

 

Link:

http://hwbot.org/newsflash/1859_statement_regarding_pcmark05_culmanitive_cleanup_and_rules_update

 

Cheers and good benching

[CherV - FX-8350 @ 7145.7MHz - 143sec 766ms wPrime 1024m]

I think, I want to know that girl...my god, impressive

[YURBAN - GeForce 6800 XT GDDR3 (NV42) @ 500/683MHz - 14266 marks 3DMark03]

Who knew - where 6800 GS NV42 AGP in submit list? )))

 

 

Here

 

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6800_gs_nv42_agp/

[can someone with power submit this heaven score for me]

massman doesnt read my pm's haha so I will try genieben on facebook. thanks

 

Yep Gen, helps you surely

[can someone with power submit this heaven score for me]

Says checksum invalid need help, must be something there its 283kb file

 

Yep i try submit this file, says checksum invalid in both heavens, dx9 and dx11, sorry splave i dont know why

 

maybe you can consult another guy, like Genieben or Massman

[YURBAN - GeForce 6800 XT GDDR3 (NV42) @ 500/683MHz - 14266 marks 3DMark03]

@Zfess you are right, thanks

 

@just nuke em

And this category, isnt correct ?, for those agp nv42 ?

 

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6800_gs_nv42_agp/

 

anyway, if you want, request in support ticket new cat. with gpu-z screen for your card.

 

regards and I move to agp the Yurban's submission

[Add mobo]

hi, go to your account (click on my account) an then click on "Recalculate points and achievements" on botton, left side, wait a minutes.

[can someone with power submit this heaven score for me]

Benched for a long time in my freezing garage to get this score lol Thanks for the help

 

http://www.filedropper.com/7421

 

No i dont upload this for you, only you can upload in your account, but if you want i upload in my account

 

sorry splave, but i cant do that

 

Why you cant ?

[YURBAN - GeForce 6800 XT GDDR3 (NV42) @ 500/683MHz - 14266 marks 3DMark03]

Hi Yurban, your graphic card show in Gpu-z "agp" , not pci-e, and your mainboard support agp and pci-e, cards but you upload in pci-e cards, something is wrong in this, or i'm wrong ?

 

Please tell to us, what card you use in this submission ?

 

regards

[GPU discussion/ add new category?]

Thanks so much kenny

[Page not loading]

already solved

[please add mobo]

Hi kryptonian_sher, may take a few days, please be patient

 

Thanks so much

[GPU discussion/ add new category?]

Hi Kenny, Turrican is out a couple of weeks. we hope and I think only Massman can modify or add to the database.

 

http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=209483&postcount=12

 

regards

 

Note: i think new one category, is the correct

[zupernico - GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb @ 684/1026MHz - 16443 marks 3DMark06]

I use Memset, or any program that show mem. Aida - well...at this time I dont remember if asus program show this

[zupernico - GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb @ 684/1026MHz - 16443 marks 3DMark06]

Yes, this sub. is ok, Ximi you have to use the common sense.

 

Edit: zupernico, next time, like say Moose, try to show memories with another soft, thanks

[Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed]

Like i said to sweet, remove mine here

http://hwbot.org/submission/2286699_

 

is blocked, but i have used flash2

 

thx

 

Done

[Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed]

yes - I have been selling my storage stuff but not all of it - yet!

 

Then, again, I will not be fighting in the PCMark with you

[Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed]

My point is this Sweet If you want to get it sorted, do right from the start, not with 12 inbetween steps... which just leads to more confusion

 

Good point.

I'm sorry for that, to maintain this benchmark, and that is what I have tried (like knopflerbruce, GENiEBEN, Pro, Gautman, Masman SF3D...well all staff), keep PcMark05.

 

Nice if you have the hardware right now, set a score and sell it. Then a month later it get's pulled because the rules changed again. It's thanks to the software tweaking guys' ingeniuty, that this benchmark is in it's current appalling state

 

Again good point.

 

Perhaps by ingenuity of tweaking's guys, or overruns tweaks (cheats - supertweaks or or whatever) has wounded at this benchmark, also assume that the staff is responsible of this, let things happen and the guys play, too much, but we got out of hand.

 

And now we must work harder to get its house in order, or PcMark cease to exist as a benchmark.

 

My apoligies, I'm just trying to fix what is broken, and there are (direct) guilty of this. I assure you that many of us are working a many time to fix this problem.

 

Note: For several days I am almost 24/7 in this forum, for fix PcMark

[Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed]

we do not preclude folks with pcie controllers (areca, lsi, high point, ...) or pcie SSDs

 

But if you and IMOG sold their arecas and i-rams ?

 

I think you have reason would we have to add