Bustah

nice work!

very nice Rich...

very nice indeed!

Stunned!

very nice indeed!

great results mate, very impressive!

nice score man!

very nice, im sure that cpu will go further on ss...

Wow!!!

very nice indeed on ic7!

A quick run with just 3& 1/2 ltrs of ln2 Available to run this and 3dmark 01

A quick run with just 3 & 1/2 ltrs of ln2 Available to run this and 3dmark 03.

very nice George.

very nice Dave well done mate!

it only shows top 20...

its not updating todays scores...you probably already know.

politicians answer questions with a question please refer to the question asked of you.

What you are saying here is your only reason for doing this are commercially motivated? hmnn Ultimately all this is really going to do is reinforce the guys that have full backing already and encourage manufacturers to provide them with ever more cherry picked hardware which leaves those left out finding it even more difficult to get good support to compete......nice move. imo The overclocker should stay out of holding events like this, its far to bias towards commercial gains rather than pure love of overclocking. If the overclocker cares about overclocking community you should be holding qualifying rounds so weveryone has a chance the big names will still be there because lets face it they get the best hardware for whatever reason.

Top 10 countries should be invited, each of those decide who to enter. thats the only fair way to do this. then 5 spots could be filled by who ever benefits the Overclocker and manufacturers the most. O therwise of course people will not be happy. You have come onto hwbot, [the only really site that fully holds rankings for overclockers. to say that you are holding a contest to showcase talent, but have seen fit to decide all by yourself who should participate. and in amongst a list of 'invited guest' countries you have a website that is not even about extreme overclocking per se. what do you expect, you are directly stepping on ppls toes here. ppl put countless hours of hard work into this sport only to be left in the shadows? some guys in your list that are not known at all.? All of these countries have very good overclockers who deserve to be in this whats the REAL reason you have left them out? Germany France UK Holland Italy etc etc etc.

Spot on........ A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five. -Groucho Marx-

To be quite honest the fact that we are top 5 team, its an insult to be left out? in F1 you qualify to have the privelidge. from what you have said overclocker the uk will be excluded. btw who is team uk? we are Benchtecuk. Sacha35 is 6th Global, surely He should have a place?? The tide seems to be against us at every angle. is the overclocker going to allow itself to be a puppet by the manufacturers? and be dictated to as to who should be entered, from what you have said the UK will be excluded in the future too. whats with that?

this is why its confusing, I thought you had to own the hardware yourself? is your diagram intended for idiots to understand jmke? Imo if this is the case it makes it very easy for dishonest ppl to bend the rules does'nt it? no way to regulate that so why have the rule in the first place. I understand that hwbot relies on ppl being honest but the sad truth is not everyone is thats the way of the world. thats why rules are needed?

unfortunately I think this is where the rules get fuzzy. for example if say a top bencher here who gets support from a company and is sent x amount of cpus, early through His selection process He finds a cpu that Hes gonna bench/submit results with, He could then in theory pass a cpu to a team member to bench with because He himself is technically not benching with it? That to me is hardware sharing or would be, just an example. Massman has done nothing wrong here I think that is concluded. the problem in my eyes is the confusion around the hardware sharing rule...what is and what isnt allowed its all a bit sketchy.

I did say willing and ABLE meaning capable or understanding what is required. I allways saw your moderation as very fair, but I have seen in the past as has been said before a result being reported. that result happened to belong to a mod. same mod checked and validated His own result? for that very reason I believe independent moderation needs to be considered. Nothing to do with you personally, but as the issue was raised here again....

independent moderation is the way to go, but I dont believe Massman is deliberately doing anything underhand at all, no one has suggested He has. but it does highlight the need for revision of hwbot moderation methods and more defined rules and guidelines.. The tricky bit is finding people able and willing to do it.