Dualist

Your 'settings' aren't standard by the look of it.

On their front page they said that they were moving the forum over to SSD's and should have been finished friday night, so should be up anytime now

click the 'advanced settings' and change cores to 8 not 2.

All I want is that they are a team and therefore they should be in the team rankings NOT the indiviual ranks. They want to bench as a sub-team or mini-team then fair enough but should be in the correct ranking accordingly, it's nothing to do with money from my point of view even though they have used this method to rise high in the indiviual ranks and get noticed by sponsers by pulling their combined resources together.

It's about benchbros.. http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=16645 They are a team aren't they or are they a team meet up.? If I am wrong or confused then please for give me but things are a little bit a miss on this one. Looking at this thread there are 3-4 of them.. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=219402 I know we haven't stopped team meets and just have owners of cards and cpu's doing scores so that's cool. But as there is more than one of them shouldn't they NOT be in the indiviual rankings as they are 6th and they are a team within a team. Would be interested in the rules and regs on this one. I in no way wish to offend anyone, I love your scores and posts guys but team in team or idividual.?

Should have got an ORB link then that would have been an awesome result. :nana:

Sorry to dig up and oldish thread but have a question So if this is true then can I use the latest driver now then with PhysX disabled even if Futuremark won't allow the driver 'cos it's not the 175.16 version.? 180.48 gives 10fps more than 175.16 in the Jane Nash without the PhysX. But like SF3D said the CPU score is an obvious thing to see if you use PhysX as it is 3x more..!! If not then can someone kick Futuremark's backside on the submission thing and block the PhysX score.?

Actually NOW it is wrong. dafridgie works for Intel and he used 4x X7460's they are the new 6 core server chips, so he's running 24 cores.!! If you look at the wprime window you can see the real speed, also check the task manager. Here's the thread on it... http://www.benchtec.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=2584&page=2 about post #24

Deleted crap. EDIT, just re-read your post RB (it's late) sounds good, personal scores are up'ed, team takes the best, starting to like this as a team effort, big teams wouldn't win but individuals do

The settings panel is covered and he's running the pro-version that's why it's been blocked. Would have been ok if he had an ORB link to show those settings.

Not a chance mate, cpu's are seen differently here. The only benches where you see a difference is in wprime and maybe 3Dmark06.

If this is true in the rules then I sincerely publicly applogise to both SF3D and to Neoforce. But the way I saw the rules were that no sharing at all, even between teams. Again I applogise as this not the case. If it's not then please re-submit your benchmarks Neoforce.

I'm sorry, I've sent you a pm but this matter should be out in the open. There can only be one user of a piece of hardware according to the HWBot rules, either be it you or Neoforce. One of you should take responsibility for it. Loved the scores, results and the thread from you guys but please don't create a 'us and them' rules situation between the mods and the rest of us benchers as to regards hardware.

Hi guys, I saw this thread over on XS.. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=194733 I have no problem with SF3D, I love his benches but on reading the thread it admits that they only had one chip and Neoforce also borrowed it and submitted the 2D benches that he did. Isn't that a bit naughty, surely only SF3D could do that.? I have no problem with the 3D benches if that was his card though. Regards, Dave.

Really.? I can bump up my overclock in windows with setfsb and submit to ORB no problem, worked ok with my 01 score.

No it doesn't, it uses what's available.

Sounds like some doesn't own a quad core to me. But seriously it you think it is a cheat because it adjusts itself to use more cores because it is available then why aren't 3d benches the same, I've heard that there is something called crossfire and something else called I think SLi. Graphical benches use these setups to gain bigger scores... amazing

Like Wprime it's pure SMP, uses what cores are available and uses it. Just like NuclearMC, another great SMP benchmark.

Works even better with 8

Found out what was wrong, I hit the online submit button and the first screen was a divert window and it just locked up on that, bugger Re-submited a slightly lesser score until I volt mod my hardware (only 1 point less)

Thanks for replies guys, I'll re-bench and try again tonight as I didn't save my file Gonna be a long night, lol

Hi guys, I didn't think Orb supported 01 results now.? I tried to submit and I couldn't Can someone enlighten me please. My result blocked.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725944 Cheers, Dave.

Advanced and no resolution.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726204 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726207 and no gpuz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719711

result wrong.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722240 says 10.37 in the submissions but is infact 10.67

Here's another multicore benchmark.. Geekbench..!! http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/ Never heard of it myself until forum wars, what do you reckon.?